| name | geode-workflow |
| description | GEODE evidence-first development workflow. Use for feature work, provider/model changes, GUI/computer-use work, PDF/document ingestion, observability/schema/event/state changes, verification planning, GitFlow merge prep, and requests to "follow the workflow" or "scaffold the process". |
GEODE Workflow
Use this skill as GEODE's default execution scaffold. It replaces the older
issue-first workflow with an evidence-first loop: inspect existing code, ground
external contracts, define the observable surface, implement narrowly, verify,
then report honestly.
Core Loop
- Scope: confirm branch, dirty files, objective, and unrelated work.
- GAP audit: search before designing; classify existing, partial, absent,
or misfit. For architecture/extensibility work, read
docs/architecture/extensibility-roadmap.md, claim a READY work package
on canonical develop, and carry its stable GAP IDs through the PR and
reconciliation flow.
- Grounding: use official docs/source for provider, SDK, model, OS,
browser, package, or current external behaviour.
- Preflight: classify task type, affected providers, required tools,
evidence class, and out-of-scope surfaces.
- Design contract: define schema, log, event, state, trajectory, provider
split, and rollback behaviour before code.
- Implement: use existing registries, adapters, redaction helpers,
transcript helpers, and atomic-write utilities.
- Observe: make runtime behaviour inspectable with bounded structured
records.
- Verify: run targeted checks first, then broaden when risk justifies
it. Non-trivial PRs also get a Codex MCP second-opinion review of the
committed diff before push (see
references/verification-gates.md).
- Report/GitFlow: state what changed, what ran, what failed or was
skipped, and only claim merge/push/cleanup after commands complete.
Reference Routing
Read only the reference needed for the current task:
| Need | Read |
|---|
| Phase-by-phase checklist for ordinary code work | references/phase-checklist.md |
| Provider/model/API capability claims | references/provider-grounding.md |
| Schema/log/event/state/trajectory consistency | references/observability-contract.md |
| Test, lint, type, prompt, and full-suite reporting gates | references/verification-gates.md |
| Branch, PR, merge, and cleanup operations | references/gitflow.md |
For simple docs or trivial bug fixes, use the core loop and skip references
that do not affect the task.
Non-Negotiables
- Do not switch branches inside an active worktree.
- Do not revert unrelated dirty work.
- Architecture/extensibility implementation work starts only after a
roadmap-only claim PR moves the package from
READY to IN_PROGRESS on
canonical develop and names its owner/implementation branch. Claim and
reconciliation PRs establish that prerequisite; they do not require an
earlier claim. The implementation PR preserves the claimed status and never
predicts IN_DEVELOP or DONE.
- Register architecture scope discovered during implementation through a
separate roadmap-only GAP-registration PR. Registration may add an
OPEN
package without a prior claim, but does not authorize implementing it.
- Within the architecture/extensibility program, use
origin/main only for a
tracking-only roadmap DONE worktree after release. Its PR targets main,
carries no implementation code, and is followed by a CI-gated
main -> develop sync.
- Do not mark unsupported provider behaviour as supported without grounding.
- Do not add ad hoc observability strings when the capability/evidence
vocabulary should be extended.
- Do not log raw screenshots, base64 blobs, API keys, tokens, passwords, or
secret fragments.
- Do not imply a full-suite pass if only targeted checks ran.
Output Contract
When finishing, include:
- implementation summary
- key files changed
- verification commands and results
- known failures, skipped gates, or live-test uncertainty
- GitFlow state if any branch/PR/merge action was requested