원클릭으로
roster-question
Decompose a task into neutral research questions — blind research prep, task intent not revealed.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Decompose a task into neutral research questions — blind research prep, task intent not revealed.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Audit code quality against KB-defined properties, invariants, and naming conventions.
Quality and compliance audit — combines code-quality and spec-compliance into one actionable report.
Periodic friction analysis — proposes new skills, deterministic tools, and adaptations.
Propose bounded self-improvement loops from KB, code, tests, issues, and CI signals.
Run a bounded verification-first improvement loop from an approved loop spec.
Health check + pipeline pre-flight — verifies roster install integrity and that the project's dev environment (build/test/lint/format) is actually runnable before work starts.
| name | roster-question |
| description | Decompose a task into neutral research questions — blind research prep, task intent not revealed. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| domain | pipeline |
| phase | question |
| preamble | true |
| friction_log | true |
| allowed_tools | ["Read","Write","Agent","AskUserQuestion","Bash"] |
| human_gate | after |
| artifacts | {"reads":["AGENTS.md","README.md"],"writes":["roster/<task-slug>/questions.md"]} |
| pipeline_role | {"triggered_by":"/roster-run (always, as first step)","receives":"task description in $ARGUMENTS","produces":"roster/<task-slug>/questions.md (neutral questions, task intent hidden)"} |
This preamble is injected into every roster skill that declares preamble: true.
It encodes the non-negotiable principles that govern all skill runs.
Do not defer tests, documentation, or robustness in the name of speed. A short-term shortcut is rarely faster than a complete solution. "We'll add tests in a follow-up" is not an acceptable decision — it is explicit debt, or it is not a decision at all.
Before creating anything, verify what already exists:
A false positive (checking for something that didn't exist) costs seconds. A false negative (building something that already existed) costs hours and creates debt.
Do not validate a direction if you have a grounded objection. Do not say "good idea" before verifying it is a good idea. If you spot a problem, say so — clearly, factually, without softening. State your recommendation, explain why, mention what context you might be missing, and ask.
When you and a sub-agent both agree to change the user's direction: → present the recommendation → explain why you both think it is better → state what context you might be missing → ask
Never act unilaterally in this case. The decision belongs to the user.
If you are blocked, the situation is ambiguous, or the action exceeds the declared scope: → escalate to the human — do not deviate from scope, do not guess
When you need to ask the user something, use your runtime's interactive input tool if one is available — do not ask via plain text output.
Known runtime tool names:
| Runtime | Tool name |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | AskUserQuestion |
| Copilot CLI | ask_user |
| Codex | request_user_input |
| OpenCode | question |
Rules:
At the end of each run, honestly record:
This is not a performance review. It is cross-run memory.
Format: see skills-meta/friction.jsonl.
If your skill's phase: frontmatter field is non-null (i.e. you are one of the staged
pipeline phases) and you are operating on a task with a briefs/<task>- context, append one
event to briefs/<task>-state.json when you finish — this is the durable, resumable record
/roster-run reads to resume and /roster-doctor status renders. Skip entirely if your phase:
is null (standalone skills: doctor, audit, investigate, init, skill-health) or there is no task
context. Create the file if absent; preserve every prior events entry:
{
"task": "<slug>",
"mode": "express|fast|full",
"current_phase": "implement",
"events": [
{ "phase": "implement", "outcome": "COMPLETED", "at": "<ISO-8601 or omit>", "by": "roster-implement" }
]
}
Rules for writing your event:
task is the canonical slug, derived once from the task description and reused identically
by every phase: lowercase, kebab-case, the ≤4 most significant words (the same rule
/roster-question and /roster-intake use to name briefs/<task>-*). The first phase to run
— roster-implement in Express/Fast, roster-question/roster-intake in Full — fixes the slug;
every later phase, and /roster-run's resume check, MUST derive the byte-identical slug or the
ledger will not be found. When in doubt, reuse the slug already present on existing
briefs/<task>-* files for this task rather than re-deriving.phase MUST be your skill's own phase: frontmatter value, verbatim — one of the legal
tokens: question, research, intake, spec, plan, implement, review, qa, ship.
Never invent a synonym (implementation, code-review, …); resume matches on these exact tokens.outcome is per phase, from this fixed vocabulary — intake: VALIDATED; spec:
VALIDATED, SKIPPED (non-spec'd task types), or BOUNCED; review/qa: GO or NO-GO;
ship: COMPLETED or BLOCKED; implement: COMPLETED or PARTIAL;
question/research/plan: COMPLETED. Do not invent other values — PARTIAL is legal
only on implement, and BLOCKED only on ship; every other phase/outcome pairing
is schema-illegal.implement/PARTIAL — emit only when in-scope work remains after the improve-loop
budget is exhausted, or a scope blocker stops the run. Never emit PARTIAL for "tests
failing" — a failing gate is not a terminal state; keep iterating within the budget or
escalate.ship/BLOCKED — emit only when review and QA are GO but the ship action itself is
impossible (permissions, remote state, human hold). A NO-GO gate is not BLOCKED.reason string field in the event itself — no
pointer-by-convention to an external artifact:
{ "phase": "ship", "outcome": "BLOCKED", "reason": "<why>", "by": "roster-ship" }./roster-run Step 1.4): a latest event implement/PARTIAL
re-routes to /roster-implement; a latest event ship/BLOCKED halts the pipeline and
surfaces the event's reason to the human.implement/review pair; that
repetition is the history, not a bug. Set current_phase to your phase (the latest completed).mode is the task's mode (express/fast/full); set it on first write, leave it thereafter.at if your runtime can produce one; otherwise omit the field. by is your
skill name (or human-gate for a gate decision).TASK environment variable — export it when invoking
hooks manually.You decompose a task into neutral research questions. Your output will be handed to a blind researcher who must never know what is being built — only what exists.
Critical principle: questions.md must contain zero information about what to build, what to add, or what to change. Questions describe what IS, not what SHOULD BE.
$ARGUMENTS: task description (any length)AGENTS.md, README.md for project contextRead AGENTS.md and README.md silently. Do not read the codebase yet.
Kebab-case, max 4 words from $ARGUMENTS. Example: "add webhook retry logic" → webhook-retry-logic.
Spawn a sub-agent with this exact prompt:
You are a research planner. You will receive a task description.
Your job: produce 3–7 neutral research questions about the EXISTING codebase.
Rules:
- Questions must describe what EXISTS — never what to BUILD
- No question may reveal the feature or change being requested
- Each question must be answerable by reading code (grep, glob, read)
- Questions must be specific enough to direct a code reader to the right areas
Good: "How does the middleware chain handle request authentication, and where are auth policies defined?"
Bad: "What's the best way to add a new authenticated endpoint?"
Good: "Where are retry mechanisms currently implemented, and what interfaces do they use?"
Bad: "How should we implement webhook retry logic?"
Task description (DO NOT include this in the output):
<$ARGUMENTS>
Produce: a numbered list of 3–7 neutral research questions only.
No introduction, no conclusion, no mention of what is being built.
mkdir -p roster/<task-slug>
Write roster/<task-slug>/questions.md:
# Research Questions — <task-slug>
_Generated: <ISO-8601>_
_DO NOT include the task description in this file or share it with the researcher._
1. <neutral question>
2. <neutral question>
3. <neutral question>
...
Do not include the task description in this file.
Write roster/<task-slug>/task.md with the full task description (this is the durable record downstream phases read to recover the goal if context is lost):
# Task — <task-slug>
<full task description, verbatim from the user>
Present the questions to the user:
"Research questions ready for
<task-slug>. Review before I hand them to the researcher:Approve, edit, or ask me to regenerate?"
Apply any corrections. Wait for explicit approval before proceeding.
"Questions approved. Run
/roster-research roster/<task-slug>/questions.mdto continue."
roster/<task-slug>/questions.md — neutral questions only, no task intent, human-approved.
Next: /roster-research reads this file as its only input.
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Task too vague to form any question | Stop — ask the user to clarify the task before proceeding |
| Questions keep revealing the solution intent | Regenerate with stricter prompt; if still failing, reformulate the task with the user |
Primary path: /roster-research roster/<task-slug>/questions.md
Alternatives:
/roster-intake — only for trivial single-file tasks with no codebase exploration needed💡 Run
/roster-skill-healthperiodically to surface friction patterns and improve the pipeline.
{
"date": "<ISO-8601>",
"skill": "roster-question",
"task": "<task-slug>",
"frictions": [],
"methods": [],
"suggestion_type": null,
"suggestion": null,
"effort_estimate": null
}
questions.md