원클릭으로
brand-guidelines
Brand identity standards for digital and marketing applications — hierarchy, logo, typography, tone, and governance.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Brand identity standards for digital and marketing applications — hierarchy, logo, typography, tone, and governance.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Expert reference for application security — OWASP Top 10 mitigations, auth/authz, secrets management, cryptography, input validation, dependency hygiene, and secure-by-default code patterns
Expert reference for token counting, prompt compression, cost estimation, and quality preservation when optimizing prompts for Claude models
Experimentation design and A/B testing standards for product teams
Expert reference for digital accessibility — WCAG conformance, ARIA, and inclusive design patterns
Authoritative reference for agent architecture selection, multi-agent orchestration, tool design, memory systems, and failure mode prevention
Expert reference for evaluating LLM systems, RAG pipelines, and AI features in production
| name | brand-guidelines |
| description | Brand identity standards for digital and marketing applications — hierarchy, logo, typography, tone, and governance. |
| version | 1 |
The Brand Hierarchy Triangle A brand architecture has three levels. At the apex: the master brand (company name, core visual identity, brand promise). In the middle: sub-brands (distinct product lines or market segments with endorsed identity). At the base: product brands (named features or editions that share the sub-brand or master brand visual system). Decisions flow downward: master brand constraints cannot be overridden by sub-brands, sub-brand constraints cannot be overridden by products. When unsure which level an asset belongs to, ask: "Would this change if the master brand underwent a refresh?" If yes, it lives at the master brand level.
The Voice/Tone Distinction Voice is the brand's consistent personality — it does not change. Tone is how that personality expresses itself given the audience's emotional state and the message's context. A brand that is "direct and empathetic" uses that voice in an error message ("Something went wrong. Here's what to do next.") and in a product announcement — the tone differs (urgent vs celebratory) but the directness and empathy are present in both. Documenting tone means creating a matrix: Situation × Appropriate Tone Dial (e.g., formal↔conversational, serious↔playful).
The Sacred vs. Flexible Asset Model Every brand element is either Sacred (never altered by anyone) or Flexible (can be adapted within defined parameters). Sacred: logo geometry, brand color values, primary typeface. Flexible: color combinations, layout grids, photography style, illustration style. This model prevents "brand police" paralysis on flexible elements while protecting genuinely non-negotiable ones. When the brand team is consulted about every gradient choice, governance breaks down. When it is consulted about logo modifications, it functions correctly.
The Channel Translation Framework
A brand visual identity is defined in a medium-agnostic format (Figma + design tokens) and then translated per channel. Web: CSS custom properties, SVG assets, web fonts. Print: CMYK Pantone anchors (brand blue might be Pantone 2728 C, not just #2563EB), TIFF/PDF exports, 300 DPI. Social: cropped icon marks, specific aspect ratios (1:1, 4:5, 16:9), platform-native typography if custom font is not embeddable. Email: inline CSS, system font fallbacks, PNG logo (SVG not universally supported). Each channel translation is documented separately and tested.
| Term | Precise Meaning |
|---|---|
| Master Brand | The top-level brand identity that governs all sub-brands and products. Contains the canonical logo, color system, and brand promise. |
| Sub-Brand | A brand with a distinct identity that is visibly related to the master brand (endorsed model) or deliberately separated (house of brands model). |
| Endorsed Brand | A sub-brand that carries a visible endorsement from the master brand (e.g., "Courtyard by Marriott"). |
| Monolithic Brand | An architecture where one brand identity covers all products (e.g., Apple). No sub-brand visual identity exists. |
| House of Brands | An architecture where each product is an independent brand with no visible master brand relationship (e.g., P&G's consumer portfolio). |
| Clear Space | The minimum exclusion zone around a logo where no other visual element may appear. Calculated from the logo's X-height or a fixed percentage of logo width. |
| X-Height | The height of the lowercase "x" in the brand's wordmark typeface. Used as the base unit for clear space calculation. |
| Lockup | An approved, fixed spatial arrangement of two or more brand elements (e.g., logo + tagline, co-brand logo pair). Cannot be recreated ad hoc. |
| Brand Voice | The fixed personality characteristics of a brand expressed in language. Defined as 3–5 adjective pairs (what we are / what we are not). |
| Brand Tone | The contextual modulation of brand voice to fit audience emotional state and message type. Varies; voice does not. |
| Primary Action Color | The color assigned to the highest-priority interactive element (primary button, primary link). May share a value with brand primary color but is a separate token. |
| Brand Governance | The documented rules specifying who has authority to create, modify, approve, and distribute brand assets, and under what conditions. |
Mistake 1: Recoloring the logo to match a background
fill from #1D4ED8 to #FFFFFF directly in code because "the dark header needs a white logo."logo-primary.svg, logo-white.svg, logo-dark.svg. Developers pull from the library; they never modify source files.Mistake 2: Condensing the logo to fit a small space
width: 100%; height: 48px; object-fit: fill — logo is horizontally squashed.object-fit: contain). If the full lockup does not fit, switch to the approved icon-only mark at that breakpoint.Mistake 3: Using three or more typefaces in brand materials
Mistake 4: Writing brand guidelines that describe instead of prescribe
Mistake 5: Treating co-branding as a purely aesthetic decision
#E5E7EB divider with 24px padding on each side.Logo Clear Space
Bad:
[LOGO] — Navigation item flush to the right edge of the logo bounding box
Icon sits at 4px from the wordmark edge — clear space rule violated, reads as cluttered.
Good:
[LOGO] [Nav Item]
Clear space = 1× capital-letter X-height of the wordmark (~16px for a 40px-tall logo). Navigation begins after that exclusion zone.
Tone of Voice — Error Message
Bad: "An error occurred while processing your request. Please try again or contact support if the issue persists."
Good (for a direct, empathetic brand voice): "We couldn't save your changes — the session timed out. Refresh the page and try again. Your draft is still here."
Sub-Brand Endorsed Lockup
Bad: Sub-brand logo stands entirely alone with no master brand reference in any brand touchpoint. Users cannot connect the product to the company.
Good: Sub-brand logo at full scale with "by [MasterBrand]" in brand secondary typeface at 40% of the sub-brand logo height, positioned below the sub-brand wordmark, separated by 0.5× X-height of whitespace.
Color Application — Action Color vs Brand Color
Bad:
:root {
--color-brand: #2563EB;
--button-primary-bg: #2563EB; /* hardcoded, not tokenized */
}
/* A brand refresh to #0EA5E9 now requires finding every hardcoded instance */
Good:
:root {
--color-brand-500: hsl(217, 91%, 52%); /* Primitive */
--color-action-primary: var(--color-brand-500); /* Semantic */
--button-primary-bg: var(--color-action-primary); /* Component */
}
/* Brand refresh: change --color-brand-500 only. Everything updates. */