mcmespinaa

**Citation Checker & Verification Agent**: Deploys 5 parallel agents to audit every citation — cross-references, APA 7 formatting, DOI validation, claim grounding, and completeness. Detects fabricated references. Produces a structured verification report.

**Systematic Literature Review Pipeline**: End-to-end systematic review — from research question through search strategy, screening, data extraction, quality assessment, synthesis, and PRISMA 2020-compliant manuscript. Produces .docx manuscript and .xlsx review matrix.

**Academic Editor Team**: Multi-pass editorial review — five sequential editors: (1) Structural Editor for argument flow, (2) Copy Editor for clarity, (3) Voice Editor for register consistency, (4) Citation Editor for reference verification, (5) Rubric Editor for grade prediction. Produces a unified editorial report.

**Academic Essay & Literature Review Writer**: Creates structured academic essays, systematic literature reviews, scoping reviews, and research papers with PRISMA compliance, PICO frameworks, and APA 7 citations. Outputs professional .docx files.

**Citation Fixer & Correction Agent**: Companion to citation-checker. Deploys 3 parallel agents to correct reference metadata, fix APA 7 formatting, and insert [CITATION NEEDED] markers. Creates backup before editing. Produces a changelog.

**Zotero Citation Helper**: Searches a Zotero library (CSL-JSON) to find references by author, title, keyword, or year. Returns citation keys [@citekey], formats APA 7 entries, generates reference lists, and suggests citations for claims.

**Academic Project Report Writer**: Creates structured project reports with business model canvases, concept notes, and theory-integrated sections. Professional .docx output with APA 7 citations, tables, and formatting.

**Research Proposal Grader**: Evaluates research proposal drafts against a rubric. Scores seven dimensions (originality, relevance, soundness, alignment, quality, feasibility), predicts grade A-F, and gives actionable revision priorities. Adaptable to any research methods course rubric.

Evaluates any project's folder architecture against the ICM five-layer context hierarchy. Scores Layer 0 (Map/CLAUDE.md), Layer 1 (Rooms/CONTEXT.md), Layer 2 (Stage Contracts), Layer 3 (Reference Material), Layer 4 (Working Artifacts), plus Tools assessment. Checks 14 anti-patterns (8 base + 6 ICM), measures 5 structural metrics. Outputs a graded audit report with prioritized fixes. Use when: setting up Claude Code on a project, reviewing workspace quality, debugging degraded AI output, onboarding a new codebase, scoring folder structure, checking folder quality, evaluating project organization.

Creates a new ICM pipeline from a domain description. Generates numbered stage folders with CONTEXT.md contracts (Inputs/Process/Outputs), reference and output directories, and a root CONTEXT.md. Use when: setting up a new staged workflow, creating a production pipeline, scaffolding an ICM workspace.

Executes a single ICM pipeline stage by reading its CONTEXT.md contract, loading scoped inputs (Layer 3 reference vs Layer 4 working), following the Process section, writing declared outputs, and pausing for human review. Use when: running a pipeline stage, executing a stage, processing the next stage.

Validates an ICM pipeline's contract chain — checks that each stage's outputs match the next stage's expected inputs, verifies factory/product separation, and flags structural anti-patterns. Use when: checking pipeline integrity, verifying handoffs, debugging broken stage connections.

Reviews a completed pipeline stage before advancing to the next one. Verifies all declared outputs exist, runs the stage's Review Checkpoint criteria, checks quality against the Process intent, and confirms downstream readiness. Use when: reviewing stage output, checking if ready to advance, verifying stage completion.

Evaluate a thesis Theoretical Framework chapter against the OL646E (SALSU Master Thesis) course rubric — the four canonical Theory-Chapter rules (problem-derived selection, selectivity, distinct-from-introduction, closing analytical framework), plus a 12-point pre-submission audit covering critical stance, concept-to-analysis traceability, and chapter-to-chapter coherence. TRIGGER when the user pastes a Chapter 3 / Theory / Theoretical Framework draft, links a markdown or PDF theory chapter, or asks to score, audit, evaluate, critique, or check a theoretical framework. Also trigger on /eval-theories. SKIP when the request is for an introduction (use anchoring-map-evaluator instead), a methodology chapter, a literature review chapter, a findings chapter, or non-thesis writing. Synthesised from the OL646E_2026 course guidelines (Malmö University SALSU programme), Chouliaraki and Fairclough (1999) on theoretical-method integration, and the Nass and Purwin (2024) examination exemplar.

Evaluate a thesis Introduction and Background draft against the Anchoring Map rubric — 5 anchors (Empirical, Literature, Assumption, Scope, Contribution), 5 funnel stages (Hook, Conversation, Problematization, Research Question, Promise and Map), and a 12-point pre-submission audit. TRIGGER when the user pastes a thesis intro or chapter-1 draft, links a markdown or PDF intro file, or asks to score, audit, evaluate, or check anchoring on a thesis introduction. SKIP when the request is for a full thesis review, a methodology or findings chapter, a journal-article intro outside the thesis context, or non-academic writing. Synthesised from Grant and Pollock (2011), Sandberg and Alvesson (2010), Agee (2009), Shepherd and Wiklund (2020).