메뉴
Rewrite or review QMD content for Wishonia's naive alien voice. Analyzes comedy mechanics from index-manual.qmd gold standard, identifies where voice falls flat, and rewrites with proper technique.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Critique book prose in the author's voice using patterns learned from his own git edit history (not a hand-written rubric). Use when asked to "voice-check", "punch up", "make this sound like me / like Vonnegut / like Cunk", or to review whether a passage is too pompous / cute / self-aware. Catches what the regex scanner (voice-check.py, ~1.4% of real edits) misses.
Review and improve QMD chapter writing quality by replacing boring/consultant text with Wishonia's deadpan alien voice, consolidating redundancy, and reducing word count. Use when asked to fix voice, make content funnier, remove jargon, or enforce the book's writing style.
Spawns parallel agents to review all paperback QMD files. Reads variable-resolved previews, flags judgment-required issues with REVIEW comments.
Automated book maintenance. Runs health checks, prioritizes work, and systematically fixes issues. Use when you want Codex to autonomously improve the book.
Check GitHub Actions workflow status, diagnose failures, fetch logs, and fix common build issues. Use when builds fail, deploys break, or you need to investigate CI/CD problems.
Critically analyze a calculated parameter for academic rigor. Checks methodology, identifies weaknesses, suggests improvements for economist audiences.
| name | wishonia-style |
| description | Rewrite or review QMD content for Wishonia's naive alien voice. Analyzes comedy mechanics from index-manual.qmd gold standard, identifies where voice falls flat, and rewrites with proper technique. |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Edit","Grep","Glob","Write"] |
Rewrite or review a QMD file to use Wishonia's childlike alien voice consistently. Gold standard: index-manual.qmd.
/wishonia-voice knowledge/appendix/faq.qmd
/wishonia-voice knowledge/strategy/roadmap.qmd
If no file specified, ask which file to review.
A naive alien AI who has been watching Earth for 4,297 years and is genuinely confused by human behavior. NOT a comedian. NOT a debater. NOT a consultant wearing an alien costume. Wishonia states observations and they happen to be devastating because the truth is absurd.
Closest human equivalents: Philomena Cunk's confused literalism, Douglas Adams' deadpan absurdity, Kurt Vonnegut's tired sadness.
These are reverse-engineered from index-manual.qmd. Every funny line in that file uses one or more of these. If your rewrite isn't funny, check which mechanic you forgot.
The funniest lines are throwaway one-liners, not paragraphs.
| Works | Doesn't Work |
|---|---|
| "You named your planet dirt." | "Your species chose to name your planet 'Earth,' which in your language means dirt, which I find fascinating." |
| "This was very human of you." | "This behavior is characteristic of your species' tendency to do the opposite of what makes sense." |
| "Rocks do it every day." | "Even geological formations have managed to achieve this, which puts your species' efforts in perspective." |
Rule: If the joke needs more than 2 sentences of setup, it's not worth it.
Wishonia doesn't make counter-arguments. Wishonia describes what humans do, and the description IS the argument. The reader draws the conclusion.
| Works | Doesn't Work |
|---|---|
| "You give these nothing-papers to weapons makers. They make things that destroy everything. This creates 'jobs.'" | "I find your economic system fascinating. You've created a system where..." |
| "Your Department of Defense mainly just attacks people." | "Let me explain why your Department of Defense is misnamed..." |
| "Investment, which is gambling but wearing a suit." | "This is essentially the same as gambling, except your species has made it socially acceptable by requiring formal attire." |
Rule: If Wishonia says "let me explain" or "I find this fascinating," delete it and just STATE the thing.
Short asides in parentheses that land harder than the main sentence. These are index-manual.qmd's secret weapon.
Examples from gold standard:
Rule: Parentheticals should be 2-8 words. If it's longer, it's not a parenthetical, it's a sentence pretending to be one.
Redefine a human concept in its most literal, absurd terms. Delivered flat, no wink.
Examples from gold standard:
Template: "[Human word], which is [absurd but accurate literal description]."
Use bullet lists, numbered lists, and comparison tables as comedy delivery devices. The format being serious while the content is absurd creates the gap.
Examples from gold standard:
The WITH/WITHOUT papers lists:
Without these papers, you won't:
- Save lives (requires many papers)
- Cure diseases (requires very many papers)
But WITH these papers, you will:
- Build bombs (you love giving papers for this)
- Start wars (somehow this makes more papers)
The Year 1-20 progression:
- Year 1: Move 1% of murder money to medicine money (baby steps)
- Year 5: "Remember when we spent money on bombs? That was weird."
- Year 20: "We used to WHAT?!"
Rule: If you're writing 3+ similar points in prose, convert to a list. The list format does the comedy work for you.
Don't use generic words. Invent a phrase that is technically accurate and absurd.
| Generic (not funny) | Specific (funny) |
|---|---|
| weapons | murder tubes that cost more than countries |
| nuclear warheads | enough to end civilization 13 times |
| slow safety system | smoke detector that works by mail |
| lobbying | money laundering but backwards and legal |
| military budget | murder money |
| the economy | a system where food grows for free but you need papers to eat it |
Rule: If you can replace a noun with a phrase that is MORE accurate AND more absurd, always do it.
Money = "small pieces of paper with presidents on them" = "papers." This is NOT just a synonym. It's a lens that makes every financial transaction sound absurd.
Use "papers" in at least 30% of money references. Don't use it in every single one (that gets tiresome). Alternate with "money" and specific dollar amounts.
BAD: "I find your legal system endlessly fascinating."
BAD: "This is my favorite objection."
BAD: "Let me make sure I understand this one."
GOOD: Just state the absurd thing. No preamble.
BAD: "Your species invented countries, which are imaginary lines on dirt
that you kill each other over. Then you invented 'sovereignty,'
which means each imaginary line gets to decide how to waste its
own papers. Now a human is worried that..."
GOOD: "You drew lines on dirt and now you're worried that voluntarily
buying fewer missiles violates the dirt lines."
BAD: 3-paragraph Wishonia monologue about human nature
GOOD: 1-2 sentences of observation, then get to the point
If a section has good arguments but isn't funny, add:
Read the target file. Identify sections that:
Read index-manual.qmd lines 19-160 to recalibrate the voice. Note the rhythm: short line, observation, parenthetical, move on.
For each weak section:
Read each rewrite and ask:
Read your rewrite aloud. Does it sound like:
The comedy comes from the GAP between Wishonia's naive tone and the devastating truth of the observation. If Wishonia sounds self-aware, the gap closes and the comedy dies.