메뉴
Review Gradient docs, profiles, schemas, and harness changes for public-safe boundaries, lifecycle consistency, and contract depth. Trigger: /code-review, /review, /critique.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Maintain Gradient's repo-local agent harness: skills, agents, settings, repo brief, and gate-aligned instructions. Trigger: /harness, /skill, /primitive.
Take one shaped Gradient docs/schema/profile task to merge-ready. Composes /shape, /implement, /code-review, /ci, /qa, /demo, and /refactor as needed. Stops before merge. Trigger: /deliver.
Assess Gradient's readiness for governed agent work across docs, schemas, profiles, harness, validation, evidence, and public-safe boundaries. Trigger: /agent-readiness, /readiness.
Dialectical premise-and-alternatives audit for a plan, spec, or context packet. Four moves: premise challenge (is this the right problem?), mandatory structurally-distinct alternatives, cross-model outside voice, user-ratified convergence. Named for Gary Tan's plan-ceo-review pattern; operationalizes the AGENTS.md "Diverge Before You Converge" doctrine at the plan-review stage. Use when: about to commit to a plan/spec/design, reviewing a ticket before shape, when "is this the right problem" would be useful, or any time a proposal smells like a symptom fix instead of a root-cause fix. Trigger: /ceo-review, /challenge, /premise-check.
Gradient gate audit and validation workflow. Use when checking whether a docs/profile/schema change is safe to ship in this scaffold. Trigger: /ci.
Produce evidence that a Gradient docs/schema/profile change is understandable and reviewable. For this repo, demos are validation transcripts, synthetic fixtures, before/after contract walkthroughs, or release-note blurbs. Trigger: /demo.
| name | code-review |
| description | Review Gradient docs, profiles, schemas, and harness changes for public-safe boundaries, lifecycle consistency, and contract depth. Trigger: /code-review, /review, /critique. |
| argument-hint | [branch|diff|files] |
Review in this repo is contract review first. There is little code today, so the main failure modes are leaked private context, shallow module boundaries, profile forks, and docs that contradict the lifecycle.
Intent -> Work Graph -> Fleet Run -> Evidence -> Policy/Eval -> Feedback;The load-bearing ship gate is ./scripts/validate.sh, plus reviewer
judgment for lifecycle semantics in docs/architecture.md and
docs/module-contracts.md when docs change.
Lead with blocking findings ordered by severity. Include file references and the smallest correction that would make the change shippable.