메뉴
Comprehensive testing and development workflow specialist combining DDD testing, characterization tests, performance profiling, and quality assurance. Use when writing tests or measuring coverage.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
AI text humanization and 윤문 (post-editing) specialist that detects and removes AI tells while preserving meaning, facts, and figures. Covers Korean, English, Japanese, and Chinese with a shared severity model (S1/S2/S3), quality grades (A/B/C/D), and 30%/50% over-editing guardrails. Use to make AI-generated text read as human-authored without changing what it says (de-ai, naturalness pass).
MoAI unified orchestrator for autonomous development. Routes natural language or subcommands (plan, run, sync, project, fix, loop, mx, feedback, review, clean, codemaps, gate, harness) to specialized agents.
Markdown-to-single-file-HTML report renderer. Six modes (status, incident, plan, explainer, financial, pr) selected automatically by report type. Zero external JS/CSS framework dependencies — inline SVG charts, single font-CDN exception for Korean readability. Self-contained output for email attachment, print, and offline viewing.
Unified thinking toolkit: Creative frameworks (Critical Evaluation, Diverge-Converge, Deep Questioning), First Principles reasoning (absorbed from moai-foundation-philosopher), and Adaptive Thinking via the `ultrathink` keyword. Use for ideation, strategic analysis, architecture decisions, and deep reasoning on complex problems.
Provides MoAI-ADK foundational principles including TRUST 5 quality framework, SPEC-First DDD methodology, delegation patterns, progressive disclosure, agent catalog reference, and token budget management (absorbed from moai-foundation-context). Use when referencing TRUST 5 gates, SPEC workflow, or context window optimization.
Provides MoAI-ADK foundational principles including TRUST 5 quality framework, SPEC-First DDD methodology, delegation patterns, progressive disclosure, agent catalog reference, and token budget management (absorbed from moai-foundation-context). Use when referencing TRUST 5 gates, SPEC workflow, or context window optimization.
| name | moai-workflow-testing |
| description | Comprehensive testing and development workflow specialist combining DDD testing, characterization tests, performance profiling, and quality assurance. Use when writing tests or measuring coverage. |
| when_to_use | Use for comprehensive testing and QA: DDD domain-driven testing, characterization tests, behavior preservation, performance profiling, code and PR review, CI/CD, and TRUST 5 quality-assurance validation. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| compatibility | Designed for Claude Code |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Bash(pytest:*), Bash(ruff:*), Bash(npm:*), Bash(npx:*), Bash(node:*), Bash(jest:*), Bash(vitest:*), Bash(go:*), Bash(cargo:*), Bash(mix:*), Bash(uv:*), Bash(bundle:*), Bash(php:*), Bash(phpunit:*), Grep, Glob, mcp__context7__resolve-library-id, mcp__context7__get-library-docs |
| user-invocable | false |
| metadata | {"version":"2.4.0","category":"workflow","status":"active","updated":"2026-01-21","modularized":"true","tags":"workflow, ddd, testing, debugging, performance, quality, review, pr-review","author":"MoAI-ADK Team"} |
| progressive_disclosure | {"enabled":true,"level1_tokens":100,"level2_tokens":5000} |
Unified development workflow combining DDD (domain-driven development) testing, debugging guidance, performance optimization, automated code review, and CI/CD quality gates. Emphasizes behavior preservation during refactoring through characterization tests.
Core Capabilities:
Workflow Progression: Debug → Refactor → Optimize → Review → Test → Profile
When to Use:
Five integrated components form the workflow:
Quality assessment model with five dimensions:
Overall score: weighted average with critical-dimension override (security/testability cannot be masked).
See TRUST 5 detailed dimensions and scoring for full assessment rubric.
Legacy Code (PRESERVE phase):
Greenfield Development:
All three follow a 6-step pattern: capture/analyze → classify → identify candidates → apply → verify → document.
See debugging/refactoring/performance step-by-step walkthroughs for detailed process tables.
5-step multi-agent pipeline:
See PR review multi-agent architecture and output format for agent role detail and example output.
Per-language toolchain mappings (Python pytest+ruff+bandit, JS/TS Jest+ESLint+npm audit, Go go test+staticcheck+gosec, Rust cargo test+clippy+gosec equivalents).
See multi-language toolchain reference for per-language testing/lint/security/perf tool inventory.
Three strictness modes:
Gate config: per-dimension thresholds, max issues by severity, coverage targets, perf benchmarks.
Four-stage pipeline: Code Quality → Testing → Performance → Security. Each stage terminates pipeline on failure with stage-specific failure report.
See CI/CD integration patterns (GitHub Actions + Docker) for job configuration walkthroughs.
Status: Production Ready Last Updated: 2026-05-23 Maintained by: MoAI-ADK Development Workflow Team Version: 2.4.0 (skill body compression pass)
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This code is already covered by integration tests" | Integration tests catch different bugs than unit tests. The testing pyramid exists for a reason. |
| "Mocking the database is too hard, I will skip that test" | If the test is hard to write because of coupling, the code needs a better abstraction boundary. |
| "80% coverage is good enough" | Coverage targets are floors, not ceilings. The missing 20% often contains the error handling paths. |
| "These are just utility functions, they do not need tests" | Utility functions are the most reused code. A bug in a utility propagates everywhere. |
| "I ran the tests locally, CI will pass" | Environment differences cause CI-only failures. Trust CI output, not local runs. |
| "Flaky tests are normal, just re-run" | Flaky tests hide real failures. Fix the flakiness or quarantine the test explicitly. |
Shift Left: Find and fix defects as early as possible. Every test that runs in CI instead of locally adds latency. Every test that could have been a unit test but is an E2E test adds fragility.
Beyonce Rule: If you liked it, you should have put a test on it. Untested behavior is unspecified behavior.
t.Skip() or skip without an accompanying issue tracker link