coograph-propose

name	coograph-propose
description	Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with specs and tasks ready for implementation.
argument-hint	Change name or description (e.g., "add user settings page").
license	MIT
metadata	{"author":"coograph","version":"2.0"}

Propose a new change — investigate the codebase, create all artifacts, and wait for approval before implementing.

---

Step 1: Understand what to build

If no input was provided, ask the user:

"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

From their description, derive a kebab-case slug (e.g., "add user auth"). Wait for their answer before proceeding.

Step 2: Investigate the codebase

Before writing anything:

1. Read .github/copilot-instructions.md for conventions and stack.
2. Search for related files, existing patterns, integration points, and risks relevant to this change.
3. Identify which files will likely be modified or created.

Step 3: Create the change directory

Create openspec/changes/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/ using today's date.

Create .openspec.yaml with:

schema: spec-driven
name: <slug>
created: <YYYY-MM-DD>

Step 4: Create proposal.md

Write openspec/changes/<slug>/proposal.md:

# Proposal: <human-readable title>

## Why
[Problem being solved and motivation]

## Goals
- [Concrete, measurable deliverable]

## Non-Goals
- [Explicit out-of-scope items]

## Decisions
- [Key design decisions and why they were made]

## Impact
- Files to modify: [specific file paths]
- Files to create: [specific file paths]
- Dependencies affected: [if any]

## Risks
- [Risk]: [mitigation]

Step 5: Create specs//spec.md

Write openspec/changes/<slug>/specs/<capability>/spec.md:

# Spec: <capability name>

## Requirements
- [Requirement 1]
- [Requirement 2]

## Scenarios
### Scenario: <description>
- Given: [precondition]
- When: [action]
- Then: [expected outcome]

Step 6: Create tasks.md

Write openspec/changes/<slug>/tasks.md with 3-8 tasks grouped by logical unit (not per-file):

# Tasks: <change-name>

- [ ] **<Logical group title>** — [description of what this group accomplishes]
  - Files: [file paths]
  - Acceptance: [measurable criteria]

- [ ] **Verification** — Run quality gates and confirm all acceptance criteria are met

Rules for tasks:

• Group mechanical changes by logical unit, not per-file ("add validation" not "update file X, update file Y")
• 3-8 tasks max — more than 10 means the scope is too large, split the change
• Every task must have measurable acceptance criteria
• Final task is always verification

Step 7: Verify artifacts

Before presenting to the user, confirm:

• proposal.md has all sections (Why, Goals, Non-Goals, Decisions, Impact, Risks)
• Impact section lists specific file paths, not vague module names
• tasks.md has 3-8 tasks grouped by logical unit
• Every task has acceptance criteria
• Risks section is honest — not empty

Step 8: Present and wait for approval

Show the user:

• Change location: openspec/changes/<slug>/
• Summary of proposal (1-2 sentences)
• Task list

Then ask: "Does this capture what you want? Say proceed to start implementation, or tell me what to adjust."

Do NOT implement anything until the user explicitly says to proceed.

Red Flags

• Proposal created without reading any existing source code
• Tasks that are per-file ("update UserService.java") instead of per-logical-unit
• Missing Risks or Non-Goals sections
• More than 10 tasks — scope is too large, split the change
• Proceeding to implementation without explicit user approval