메뉴
Run format, lint, build, and test verification before claiming work is complete. Detects the project toolchain (Taskfile, Makefile, or raw Go) and runs the appropriate commands. Use before committing, pushing, creating PRs, claiming a fix works, or any completion assertion.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | verify-when-complete |
| description | Run format, lint, build, and test verification before claiming work is complete. Detects the project toolchain (Taskfile, Makefile, or raw Go) and runs the appropriate commands. Use before committing, pushing, creating PRs, claiming a fix works, or any completion assertion. |
No completion claims without fresh verification evidence.
This skill is the operational arm of ~/.claude/rules/probe-not-assume.md: claims of completion require fresh, probed evidence, not implementer self-report.
Evidence before claims, always. If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
Before claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
!if [ -f Taskfile.yaml ]; then echo "taskfile"; elif [ -f Makefile ]; then echo "makefile"; else echo "raw"; fi
Use the detected toolchain above to select commands from the tables below.
Run each step in order. If any step fails, stop and report the error.
| Toolchain | Command |
|---|---|
| Taskfile | task fmt (if exists) |
| Makefile | make fmt (if exists) |
| Raw Go | go fmt ./... |
| Toolchain | Command |
|---|---|
| Taskfile | task lint (if exists) |
| Makefile | make lint (if exists) |
| Raw Go | go vet ./... |
| Toolchain | Command |
|---|---|
| Taskfile | task build (if exists) |
| Makefile | make build (if exists) |
| Raw Go | go build ./... |
| Toolchain | Command |
|---|---|
| Taskfile | task test (if exists) |
| Makefile | make test (if exists) |
| Raw Go | go test -race -count 1 -v ./... |
If a specific task/target doesn't exist, fall back to the raw Go equivalent. Run tests uncached (-count 1), with race detection, no -short flag.
task test -- -run '^TestX$' -count=1) is the natural reproducer for the bisect skill. When a test that this skill once green-lit is now red, bisect with that exact command.Use when asked to rewrite or format text in the user's voice, "make this sound like me", "match my voice", "de-stiffen this", when text "reads too corporate / businessy / stiff", to "strip the em-dashes / agent typography", or to draft a Slack announcement, PR body, or doc in the user's voice. Also /match-voice.
Use when writing or rewriting reader-facing technical text — documentation, READMEs, runbooks, procedures, error messages, release notes, incident reports, API guides, agent/system prompts — or when asked to "de-slop", "make this readable", "simplify this doc", "write for non-native readers", "apply STE", "Simplified Technical English", or "ASD-STE100", or to prepare text for translation. Also use to CHECK such text for clarity violations. Do NOT use for chat replies, PR/review comments, or commit messages (that is terse-output), nor for marketing, brand, or personal-voice writing (that is match-voice) — this skill deletes persuasion by design.
Use when the user asks for a deep review, full review, comprehensive review, production readiness assessment, full audit, multi-domain audit, "security and reliability and code review", or "review everything". Also use when the user explicitly requests performance review alongside the comprehensive request (e.g. "include perf", "review including performance", "deep review with perf"); without that explicit phrasing, performance is excluded. Do NOT use for narrow single-domain reviews (use the matching review-* skill directly).
Review code architecture (SOLID, design patterns, package design, coupling, testability), Go best practices, and protobuf/API design using manual analysis and static analysis tools (gocyclo, staticcheck, buf). Use when the user asks for a code review, architecture review, Go review, protobuf review, SOLID review, or design pattern review.
Use when the user wants to execute an approved implementation plan and says any of "do it" (with a plan in scope), "lets do it" / "let's do it", "confirmed" (as approval to proceed on a plan), "implement the plan", "implement this", "execute the plan", "start implementing", "work through the plan", "implement the next phase", "build it out", "knock out the plan", or "/implement-plan PATH". Also use when a plan file (`./.plans/PLAN.md`, any `./.plans/*.md`, or legacy `./PLAN.md` / `./docs/plans/*.md`) is present and the user signals readiness to begin coding. Do NOT use when the user is still discussing, refining, or asking questions about the plan, nor when no plan exists — short imperatives like "do it" or "confirmed" alone are ambiguous; verify a plan is in scope before activating.
Use when the user asks to review the plan, sanity-check the plan, vet the plan, evaluate the plan, "is this plan ready", feasibility check on a plan, "review-plan PATH", or when another skill (like implement-plan) requests pre-flight plan evaluation before execution. Do NOT use when no plan file is in scope (the user is likely asking for a summary — use Read instead), nor when the user is asking about source code (use review-code), nor when the user wants documentation review (use review-documentation).