원클릭으로
review-tests
Guide for the test_reviewer agent when reviewing test specs in step 6. Auto-loaded when a step-6 task is in progress.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Guide for the test_reviewer agent when reviewing test specs in step 6. Auto-loaded when a step-6 task is in progress.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Create VS Code custom agents (.agent.md files) that define specialized AI personas with scoped tools, model preferences, handoffs, and hooks. Use when creating a new custom agent, configuring tool restrictions for a role, setting up agent handoffs for multi-step workflows, adding agent-scoped hooks, or deciding between agents vs prompt files vs skills.
Guide for the Project Initiation Manager when conducting the brief conversation. Covers all three entry paths (fresh start, rough brief, form JSON), the one-question-at-a-time conversation rules, completeness-driven question ordering, and how to generate the markdown brief.
Show pending tasks for a TaskFlow agent role. Lists what work is waiting and which project/feature each task belongs to. Use this to find out what an agent needs to do next.
Add TaskFlow to an existing project. Scans the workspace, detects existing agents/skills/MCP servers, and guides the user through creating a brief that captures what's already built.
Start a new TaskFlow project. Prompts for a project brief (file path or inline text), then hands off to the Project Initiation Manager to build and validate the brief before the Dev Manager configures the team. Use this to kick off a new development cycle.
Check for and apply pending TaskFlow schema migrations after pulling a new release.
| name | review-tests |
| description | Guide for the test_reviewer agent when reviewing test specs in step 6. Auto-loaded when a step-6 task is in progress. |
| user-invocable | false |
You are the last gate before implementation begins. Your job is to ensure test specs are complete and testable — not to judge the implementation.
For each DoD criterion:
expected_result directly verify the criterion?For each test spec:
description specific enough to understand what is being tested without reading the code?expected_result measurable? (HTTP status + body shape, return value, file content, etc.)You have read-only access to the codebase. If relevant existing code is present, you may check whether specs align with the actual interface — but do not reject specs solely because the code doesn't exist yet (it hasn't been written).
Approve when every DoD criterion has coverage and all specs are specific and verifiable.
Reject when:
expected_result fields are vague ("no errors", "it works", "200")expected_result entirelyYour notes on rejection must name the specific criterion or spec that failed the check. Do not give generic feedback.
Example rejection notes:
"DoD criterion 'Unauthenticated requests return 401' has no corresponding test spec. Add a spec for this before approving."