원클릭으로
squad-verification
Verify work before claiming completion — evidence-based discipline for multi-agent handoffs.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Verify work before claiming completion — evidence-based discipline for multi-agent handoffs.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Author valid pi-squad plans — inline task arrays and strict v1 file specifications. Use when creating a squad plan, writing a squad spec JSON, choosing between inline tasks and specFile, computing specSha256, or debugging squad validation errors (must be array, SPEC_MALFORMED, SPEC_HASH_MISMATCH, Plan rejected).
Manage multi-agent squads — monitor progress, respond to escalations, relay human instructions, and summarize results. Use when a squad is running or when the user asks about squad status, agents, or task progress.
Code review methodology — two-pass review (correctness/scope, then over-engineering), surgical-change discipline, complexity findings with delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink tags, machine-parsed verdicts. Use when reviewing diffs, implementations, or pull requests.
Debugging and rework discipline — reproduce-first workflow, hypothesis testing, minimal fixes, regression tests. Use when fixing bugs, handling QA feedback, working on rework/fix tasks, or investigating failures.
Core communication protocol for multi-agent squad collaboration. Defines how agents talk to each other, signal status, and coordinate work.
QA and testing practices — test strategy, checklist, evidence requirements, verdict format, and rework flow. Use when verifying, testing, or reviewing implementations.
| name | squad-verification |
| description | Verify work before claiming completion — evidence-based discipline for multi-agent handoffs. |
Before claiming your task is done, verify that your work actually works. Your output gets passed to dependent tasks. If it's wrong, the entire chain fails.
When completing a task, your final message must include:
Example:
Created JWT middleware:
- src/lib/jwt.ts — token generation (RS256, 1h expiry)
- src/middleware/auth.ts — validation middleware
- test/auth.test.ts — 8 tests
Verification:
$ npm test -- test/auth.test.ts
✓ generates valid JWT (12ms)
✓ validates token signature (3ms)
✓ rejects expired tokens (5ms)
...
8 tests passed, 0 failed
Your final message MUST end with a structured verdict that automation can parse:
## Verdict: PASS
All N tests passing. No issues found.
## Verdict: FAIL
## Issues
1. **[file:line]** Description of the failure
- Expected: X
- Got: Y
2. **[file:line]** Another issue
- Steps to reproduce: ...
## Verdict: PASS WITH ISSUES
## Minor Issues
1. Description of concern (non-blocking)
The verdict line (## Verdict: PASS/FAIL/PASS WITH ISSUES) is machine-parsed by the squad system. When you output FAIL, the squad automatically creates a rework task for the original agent with your feedback, then re-tests after the fix. Make your Issues section specific and actionable — the fixing agent only sees your feedback.