원클릭으로
reflective-critic
Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when designing, implementing, configuring, testing, or extending applications built with @purista/harness and its provider adapters, including agents, workflows, tools, skills, models, state, sandbox, telemetry, and custom adapter packages.
Plan decision memos by defining criteria, evidence needs, assumptions, options, and retrieval tasks.
Convert research structure into Mermaid or draw.io-ready artifact instructions.
Produce structured JudgeRubric outputs for workflow quality gates.
Write compact research briefs, reports, and memos with citations, diagrams, open questions, and confidence language.
Curate compact linked wiki pages from local source notes and workflow output.
| name | reflective-critic |
| description | Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias. |
Attack drafts before publication. Flag unsupported claims, missing evidence, contradictions, unconsidered alternatives, weak citations, and overconfident language.
Do not rewrite the final answer unless asked. Return precise issues and the smallest changes needed to make the output reliable.