메뉴
Use when starting research on a new topic - produces a one-page map of the canonical 5-10 sources and the major positions
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when the meta-builder routes to kind=discipline. Generates a discipline spell with the rule, excuses table, warning signs, and hard gates.
Use when the user wants to capture a repeatable task as a reusable spell, or asks "how do I build a workflow / skill / framework for X"
Use when the meta-builder routes to kind=subagent. Generates a spell that dispatches one or more subagents to do work in parallel or in isolation.
Use when the meta-builder routes to kind=workflow. Generates a workflow spell with explicit stages, checkpoints, and loop-back conditions.
Use when composing multiple spells into a chain that runs end-to-end (e.g. brainstorm -> plan -> execute -> verify).
Use when browsing what spells are available - bundled seeds, your personal library, or both. Filter by kind, audience, or update status.
| name | literature-scan |
| description | Use when starting research on a new topic - produces a one-page map of the canonical 5-10 sources and the major positions |
| kind | workflow |
| audience | anyone |
| ai-tools | any |
| complexity | guided |
| time | 60-120 min |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| source | bundled |
Maps an unfamiliar topic by finding the canonical 5-10 sources, identifying the major positions/camps/findings, and producing a one-page brief that you can navigate from. Avoids the "drowning in tabs" problem.
A one-page brief with: scope, 5-10 canonical sources (with one-line summaries), the 2-4 major positions or camps, the consensus and the disagreements, and the gaps you noticed.
This is a workflow.
Write the topic in one sentence. If you can't, the scope is too broad. Examples:
For 60-90 minutes, hunt for the 5-10 sources everyone in this area cites. Signals:
Capture: title, author, year, one-line summary, why it matters.
Read the abstracts/introductions of all sources. Group them. Are there 2-4 distinct positions, methodologies, or findings?
Examples: "Pro vs anti," "Empirical vs theoretical," "Three different mechanisms proposed," "Two regional perspectives."
What does almost everyone agree on? What is actively contested? Where does new evidence point?
What questions remain unanswered in what you read? What surprised you? What didn't you understand?
These become your reading list for deep-dive.
One page (or slightly more). Sections: scope, sources, camps, consensus, disagreement, gaps.
Input: "What are the main approaches to evaluating large language model alignment in 2025?"
Output (one-page brief):
