원클릭으로
ideating
Structured requirement discovery before implementation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Structured requirement discovery before implementation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Post-implementation integrity and quality audit.
Session-start skill discovery protocol.
Structured root-cause investigation for bugs and failures.
Execute implementation plan task-by-task inline.
Complete work with merge, PR, or cleanup options.
Integrity guardrails during code implementation.
| name | ideating |
| description | Structured requirement discovery before implementation. |
Investigate context, interview the user, converge on an approved design, then hand off to arsyn:planning.
Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write code, or scaffold until a design is presented and the user approves it. No exceptions — even for "trivial" tasks. A short design is fine; no design is not.When upcoming questions involve UI, layout, diagrams, or visual comparisons, offer the playground plugin. This is its own message — no other content.
"Some decisions ahead may be easier to evaluate visually. I can use the playground to show mockups, diagrams, and comparisons in a browser. Want to try it?"
If accepted, read skills/ideating/references/playground-guide.md before proceeding. If declined, continue text-only.
Even after acceptance, decide per-question: use playground only when seeing something beats reading about it.
Use AskUserQuestion calls to gather requirements — not freeform paragraphs.
Present 2-3 approaches with trade-offs. Lead with your recommendation and why. Never present a single "obvious" option — the user may hold context you lack.
Present the design in sections scaled to complexity. After each section, confirm before continuing.
Tag each section:
[CONFIDENCE: HIGH] — clear requirement, clear path[CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM] — reasonable but assumption-laden[CONFIDENCE: LOW] — best guess, needs validation[CONFIDENCE: NEEDS INPUT] — blocked without user inputCover as applicable: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing strategy.
docs/arsyn/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md (user preference overrides path). Commit it.references/spec-document-reviewer-prompt.md) with crafted review context — never raw session history. Fix issues and re-dispatch until approved (max 3 iterations, then surface to user).Invoke arsyn:planning to produce an implementation plan. No other skill.
git commit before moving to planning.AskUserQuestion calls, not walls of text with embedded questions.