메뉴
Guides research ideation from broad thoughts to a focused, testable plan with explicit scope cuts, prioritized hypotheses, and immediate next experiments. Use when the user wants co-creation and step-by-step narrowing, not review verdicts.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Migrates BITE's architecture to a new professional domain (e.g. frontend development, accounting, journalism). Interactive session with the user to map research concepts to domain equivalents, then generates a complete set of adapted skills and folder structure. Explicit trigger only.
Batch-analyzes papers from a user-provided CSV or `obsidian-vault/paper_list.csv` by splitting the list into safe per-batch CSVs, spawning parallel worker agents, writing analysis notes under `obsidian-vault/analysis/`, and refreshing `obsidian-vault/index/` after all completed batches. Use when the user asks to analyze many papers from `paper_list.csv` or run a local batch paper analysis workflow.
Collects paper candidates from non-GitHub web URLs — conference sites, lab homepages, proceedings pages, Google Scholar results, blog posts with paper lists, etc. Fetches and stores pages locally, then appends rows to `obsidian-vault/paper_list.csv`. Use when the user provides web URLs (not GitHub repos) + keyword constraints + venue/year and wants candidates added to the unified log. For GitHub repos, use `papers-collect-from-github-repo` instead.
Uses colocated paper download tools to download, verify, and repair local PDFs from `obsidian-vault/paper_list.csv` rows so that `obsidian-vault/paperPDFs/` stays complete and deduplicated. Use when candidate rows are in `state=Wait` and should become `Downloaded` before the formal analysis chain.
Unified entry for the research pipeline. Maps current work to one stage (import-local-pdfs/collect/download/analyze/build/query/ideate/focus/review/audit/export), recommends the right existing skill/command, supports step-by-step and end-to-end guidance, and keeps stage boundaries clear without duplicating underlying capabilities.
Runs a unified metadata consistency audit across obsidian-vault/analysis logs and analysis notes, checking title/venue/year consistency, link/pdf_ref completeness, duplicates, and structure anomalies; writes quality_report_*.md under obsidian-vault/batches/reports.
| name | idea-focus-coach |
| follows | rf-obsidian-markdown |
| description | Guides research ideation from broad thoughts to a focused, testable plan with explicit scope cuts, prioritized hypotheses, and immediate next experiments. Use when the user wants co-creation and step-by-step narrowing, not review verdicts. |
Turn broad or fuzzy research thoughts into a focused and executable plan.
This is a co-creation and convergence mode. It does not provide accept/reject-style reviewer verdicts.
papers-query-knowledge-base to ground related work and feasible spaces.Return structured sections:
This skill can be used independently and does not depend on outputs from research-brainstorm-from-kb or reviewer-stress-test. Users can directly bring fuzzy ideas into the focus flow. Likewise, focus output can (but does not have to) be passed to reviewer-stress-test for further challenge.