원클릭으로
review-workflow-guidance
Guide agents to choose a review pass intentionally and keep findings structured.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Guide agents to choose a review pass intentionally and keep findings structured.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Watch an open GitHub pull request for CI, mergeability, bot reviews, and human feedback until it is ready, closed, or blocked.
Harness-portable autonomous delivery loop for a scoped software task: front-load uncertainty, produce or confirm a plan, implement with TDD and validation, run review passes, prepare git/GitHub artifacts, and babysit the PR when authorized. Use when the user wants a mostly hands-off problem-to-PR workflow.
Use for commit, push, pull request, issue, and GitHub CLI workflows; emphasizes diff-grounded text and safe non-interactive commands.
Harness-portable planning and requirements-capture workflow for turning vague, risky, architectural, multi-workstream, or scope-drift-prone requests into durable artifacts before implementation. Use when the user asks to scope, plan, workshop, write a spec, capture acceptance criteria, prepare an implementation handoff, or when product intent should not be guessed.
Read-only reviewer for checking whether an implementation milestone matches an approved plan or spec.
Use when starting feature work that should be isolated from the main checkout; creates or verifies an isolated git worktree with safety checks.
| name | review-workflow-guidance |
| description | Guide agents to choose a review pass intentionally and keep findings structured. |
Use this when a task needs a post-implementation review pass.
::code-comment findings as typed review output, not
decorative markdown.Findings first, then questions/assumptions, then a short summary. If no issues are found, say so and name any residual test gaps.