메뉴
Analyze project requirements and recommend suitable open source licenses (MIT, Apache, GPL, AGPL, LGPL, MPL, BSL, SSPL, etc.). Use when the user asks about licensing, choosing a license, open source strategy, or mentions license names like MIT/GPL/Apache.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | license-advisor |
| description | Analyze project requirements and recommend suitable open source licenses (MIT, Apache, GPL, AGPL, LGPL, MPL, BSL, SSPL, etc.). Use when the user asks about licensing, choosing a license, open source strategy, or mentions license names like MIT/GPL/Apache. |
Help users select the most appropriate open source license by analyzing their product requirements, business model, and goals.
Ask the user about:
| Requirement | Recommended Licenses |
|---|---|
| Maximum adoption, minimal restrictions | MIT, ISC, Unlicense |
| Adoption + patent protection | Apache 2.0 |
| Derivatives must stay open (weak copyleft) | LGPL, MPL 2.0 |
| All derivatives must be open (strong copyleft) | GPL v3 |
| Network/SaaS derivatives must be open | AGPL v3 |
| Time-delayed open source | BSL 1.1 |
| Prevent cloud competition | SSPL, Elastic License, FSL |
| Dual licensing strategy | GPL + Commercial |
Format your recommendation as:
## License Recommendation
**Primary recommendation**: [License Name]
**Alternative options**: [Other suitable licenses]
### Why this license fits your needs
[2-3 bullet points explaining the match]
### Key considerations
- [Important implication 1]
- [Important implication 2]
### Compatibility notes
[Dependencies, ecosystem considerations]
| License | Patent Grant | Attribution | Key Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIT | No | Yes | Maximum adoption |
| Apache 2.0 | Yes | Yes | Corporate-friendly, patent protection |
| BSD 3-Clause | No | Yes | Similar to MIT |
| ISC | No | Yes | Simplified MIT |
| License | Scope | Network Trigger | Key Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPL v3 | Full | No | Ensure all derivatives open |
| LGPL v3 | Library boundary | No | Open libraries, closed apps OK |
| MPL 2.0 | File-level | No | Per-file copyleft |
| AGPL v3 | Full | Yes | SaaS must share code |
| License | After Delay | Cloud Restriction | Key Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSL 1.1 | Configurable (typically 4yr) | Production use restricted | Delayed open source |
| SSPL | Never (not OSI) | Must open entire stack | Anti-cloud provider |
| Elastic 2.0 | No | SaaS restriction | Similar to SSPL, less strict |
| FSL | 2 years → Apache/MIT | Production restricted | Functional Source |
→ MIT or Apache 2.0 (if patent protection needed)
→ AGPL v3 (if open source important) or BSL/SSPL (if commercial protection priority)
→ LGPL v3 (for libraries) or MPL 2.0 (file-level copyleft)
→ GPL v3 + Commercial dual license or BSL 1.1
→ SSPL, Elastic License 2.0, or FSL
For comprehensive license details, compatibility matrices, and legal considerations, see LICENSES.md.
Turn your static AI skills into evolving Genes that compete, improve, and self-select in a live Arena. Use when the user wants smarter skills, self-improving agents, or mentions evolution, fitness, arena, gene, or rotifer.
Unified entry point for Rotifer Protocol — guide, architect, and challenge your agents
Unified entry point for Rotifer Protocol — guide, architect, and challenge your agents
Your Agent evolves itself — scans capabilities, benchmarks against Arena rankings, and upgrades automatically
Interactive agent creation — choose from curated templates covering quality diagnosis, security scanning, content analysis, Web3 auditing, and document Q&A
Your Agent evolves itself — scans capabilities, benchmarks against Arena rankings, and upgrades automatically