메뉴
End-to-end workflow from GitHub issue to reviewed code. Reads issue, creates plan, implements code, and iterates review-fix cycles until quality passes.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | implement-from-issue |
| description | End-to-end workflow from GitHub issue to reviewed code. Reads issue, creates plan, implements code, and iterates review-fix cycles until quality passes. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | ["issue-number"] |
GitHub Issue からレビュー済みコードまでのライフサイクルを自動化する (GitHub Issue → 計画 → 実装 → レビュー)。
Issue 番号 (例: 123 または #123) または GitHub Issue の URL。
$ARGUMENTS
引数の Issue 番号を使って /plan-from-issue スキルのワークフローに従う。
/implement-from-plan スキルのワークフローに従い、PLANS.md の全項目を実装する。
-y オプションを付けて /commit スキルのワークフローに従い、コミットを自動承認する。
以下のサイクルを最大 3 回繰り返す:
/review-code スキルのワークフローに従い、すべての変更をレビューする-y オプションを付けて /commit スキルのワークフローに従い、修正をコミットするサマリーを出力する:
Done: Issue #<number> implemented and reviewed.
Review cycles: <count>
Generic thinking protocol for deriving optimal solutions through iterative self-checking. Invoke BEFORE searching within the given problem space whenever the user asks for advice, judgment, evaluation, or choice. Reframes the problem, generates options, evaluates trade-offs, runs a self-answer check (does this answer the user's actual question at the right granularity, reach upstream, match expectations, offer non-obvious value?), and loops back to upstream tracing or same-level reframing if the check fails — until convergence. Applies across any domain — technical, process, organizational, decision-making, career. Triggers when the user uses evaluation or reconsideration language ("which is best", "root cause", "is this really needed", "sustainable long-term", "ほんとうに", "そもそも", "最善は", "根本は", "筋が良い"), when validating the soundness of someone's proposal from multiple perspectives, when the problem spans multiple layers (tech / process / org / regulation / UX / cost), or when clear trade-offs exist.
Review the local diff with flat-perspective sub-agents, fix findings in a loop, then create a PR via the create-pr skill once the review is clean
計画や設計について、ユーザーを徹底的に問い詰めて一緒に詰める。実装・着手の前に計画をストレステストしたいとき、または「詰めて」「グリルして」「問い詰めて」「ツッコんで」「設計レビューして」「ほんとうにこれでいい?」などのトリガー表現が出たときに必ず使う。
.claude/rules/ 配下のルールファイル (*.md) を新規作成・編集するときに、適切なメカニズム選択と paths スコープを保証する。ルールを書く前・書いた後に必ず適用する。
Orchestrate Epic issue as team leader. Delegate sub-issues to member agents in isolated worktrees. Members run in background and communicate via SendMessage.
Fetch a GitHub issue with its sub-issues, walk up to the parent Epic, list sibling issues under that Epic, fetch the body of each sibling issue, attach the implementing PR for each closed sibling with body and diff summary, gather related code, and present as a Japanese summary so the reader can grasp the whole task context including the actual contents of siblings and their PRs