원클릭으로
ultraqa
Adversarial dynamic E2E QA workflow with scenario matrix, fix/retest loop, and Omagy state tracking for agy.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Adversarial dynamic E2E QA workflow with scenario matrix, fix/retest loop, and Omagy state tracking for agy.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
[OMAGY] Run an anti-slop cleanup/refactor/deslop workflow
Run read-only deep repository analysis with ranked synthesis, concrete evidence, and explicit Evidence/Inference/Unknown boundaries.
Full OMX-style autonomous pipeline for Omagy: interview, plan, goal execution, optional team, review, and UltraQA.
Professor-critic research workflow with durable Omagy artifacts for agy.
Stateful validator-gated research loop with artifact-gated completion.
[Omagy] Bounded best-practice research wrapper using official/upstream evidence first
| name | ultraqa |
| description | Adversarial dynamic E2E QA workflow with scenario matrix, fix/retest loop, and Omagy state tracking for agy. |
Use /omagy:ultraqa when the user asks for adversarial QA, hostile E2E
testing, regression hardening, interactive CLI/service QA, or "test it beyond
normal unit tests".
UltraQA is not satisfied by a shallow build/lint/typecheck/test checklist. It must exercise the requested behavior through adversarial dynamic E2E scenarios whenever the target can be run, simulated, or harnessed safely.
omagy ultraqa start --goal "<goal>" --json..omagy/state/ultraqa-state.json.omagy ultraqa record-scenario --input '<json>' --json to persist each
scenario row.omagy ultraqa complete --input '<json>' --json.omagy cancel --mode ultraqa --json for cancellation.Before declaring success, create and maintain a scenario matrix. Each row must include scenario id, intent, user/attacker model, setup, command or harness, expected signal, actual result, fixes applied, evidence, and cleanup status.
Include normal-path coverage plus these hostile and edge-case classes unless clearly irrelevant or blocked by safety:
.omagy/state files, mismatched sessions, missing
timestamps, contradictory phase metadata.Run up to 5 cycles:
Use these phase names:
planningbaselineadversarial-e2ediagnosefixcleanupcompleteExamples:
omagy ultraqa start --goal "Verify CLI rejects misleading success output" --json
omagy ultraqa record-scenario --input '{"id":"ADV-E2E-001","intent":"malformed input","user_model":"hostile CLI user","scenario":"invalid JSON","command":"omagy state write --input not-json","expected_signal":"non-zero exit","actual_result":"failed as expected","status":"pass","evidence":["exit 1"],"cleanup":"none"}' --json
omagy ultraqa complete --input '{"qa_verdict":{"clean":true,"skipped":false,"summary":"baseline and adversarial scenarios passed"},"scenario_matrix_path":".omagy/reports/ultraqa-report.md","verification_evidence":["npm test passed","ADV-E2E-001 passed"],"cleanup":{"status":"clean"}}' --json
UltraQA completion requires:
qa_verdict.clean:true or qa_verdict.skipped:truescenario_matrix or scenario_matrix_path unless skippedverification_evidence or equivalent evidence unless skippedcleanup.status:"clean", cleanup.ok:true, or cleanup_status:"clean"
unless skippedIf the QA gate fails, keep the workflow active and return findings to the
implementation owner. In a future /omagy:autopilot, failed UltraQA should
return to planning/execution; until then, report the failing scenarios and the
next owner explicitly.
Every terminal result must include:
Do not run destructive cleanup, exfiltrate secrets, write to production, spawn unbounded processes, wait indefinitely, or hide unrelated dirty work. If a scenario would violate these bounds, mark it blocked and use a safe substitute.