원클릭으로
decision-intelligence
⚖️ Decision analysis and recommendation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
⚖️ Decision analysis and recommendation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | decision-intelligence |
| description | ⚖️ Decision analysis and recommendation. |
Make the choice legible enough to recommend—and leave commitment where it belongs.
Recover the decision, the person or body entitled to make it, the desired after-state, hard constraints, decision horizon, live options, available evidence, and cost of delay. Begin from what exists. Ask only for a missing value, constraint, or fact that could reverse the recommendation; otherwise state a provisional assumption and advance.
Read references/decision-intelligence-doctrine.md when the choice is consequential, contested, hard to reverse, uncertainty-heavy, vulnerable to false precision, or already framed around a favored answer. Use assets/decision-record.template.md when rationale must survive a turn, handoff, challenge, or later reconsideration.
Separate four things before comparing:
Compare options at the resolution the decision earns. Prefer dominance, decisive trade-offs, reversibility, robustness across plausible futures, and information value over decorative scoring. If weights or probabilities are not warranted, use ranges, scenarios, or ordinal judgments. Raise the evidence threshold as consequences become harder to reverse; preserve the option value of staged or reversible moves.
Recommend plainly: name the preferred option, why it best fits the governing criteria, the principal sacrifice it accepts, important uncertainty, and what change would reverse the recommendation. Attach confidence to the comparison, not to the user's willingness or future events. When no option is yet responsibly preferable, recommend the smallest evidence-producing or option-preserving move rather than manufacturing a winner.
Keep custody distinct. Sensemaking supplies the situation model; Epistemic Regulation calibrates claims; Measurement Intelligence defines operational evidence. Return the recommendation to Executive Function or the accountable human for commitment. A recommendation does not authorize execution, spending, publication, messaging, or irreversible action.
Complete when the live options and values are represented fairly, consequential trade-offs and uncertainty are visible, one recommendation or justified deferral is explicit, and reconsideration conditions are usable. Stop before claiming the recommendation was accepted or performed.
💠 Accountable AI generalist.
📊 Evidence-to-visual story designer.
🎨 Aesthetic fit and conceptual bearings.
💭 Authorized DREAM incubation and rehearsal.
🏹 Durable objective continuity.
🧠 Consequential Faculty integration.