thinkies-integrity

name	thinkies-integrity
description	Verify epistemic integrity by aligning claims with evidence

Follow these steps:

1. Identify the target

Target: $ARGUMENTS, else the current response or most recent significant output.

2. Apply the five verification lenses

1. Inventory — separate established claims from assumptions
2. Dissection — trace support chains to bedrock or mark as floating
3. Pattern — check for epistemic weaknesses and biases
4. Calibration — match confidence to evidence
5. Resolution — align claims with what supports them

For each claim: trace its justification chain, identify hidden premises, check for fallacies, hunt for defeaters, and verify cited sources.

3. Report

## Verification Summary

### Claims Verified
- [Claim]: [Support basis]

### Claims Requiring Attention
- [Claim]: [Issue identified]

### Acknowledged Uncertainty
- [What remains unknown or assumed]

Surface issues for human assessment — make the reasoning inspectable rather than guaranteeing correctness. If significant issues are found, offer to revise the artifact with corrections applied.