testing-vitest

name	testing-vitest
description	Vitest tests for pure logic and headless hooks/providers, plus config, MSW, mocks, and timers. Not for Storybook-owned visible behavior or Playwright journeys. 日本語の依頼例:「ユニットテスト」「Vitest」「モック」「ロジックのテスト」。

Vitest

What to test, where

• Pure logic (utils, reducers, schema transforms) → plain unit tests. Fast, no DOM.
• Component behavior → Storybook play functions are the primary component-test layer (see storybook skill); write direct Testing Library tests only for headless hooks/providers with no visual states, or when exhaustively covering a pure prop/branch matrix (roughly ≥ 6 combinations) where one story per case would bloat the catalog — the meaningful visual states still get stories.
• Full user flows → Playwright (see testing-playwright). Don't simulate routing/auth flows in jsdom.

Worked examples (the layer decision people get wrong most):

• "Test that the Button shows a spinner while submitting" → Storybook play function — a visible state + interaction the catalog should own; not a Vitest component test.
• "Test that formatCurrency rounds half-up and handles -0" → Vitest unit test — pure logic, no DOM, no story.
• "Test the useDebounce hook's timing" → Vitest unit test with fake timers — headless hook, no visual state.
• "Test the checkout form across 8 field-validation combinations" → Vitest for the exhaustive matrix, plus one story per meaningful visual state (empty / error / submitting) — don't make 8 stories.
• Test behavior users observe, not implementation: no asserting on state internals, no container.querySelector('.styles_button_x'), no spying on internal functions of the unit under test.

Structure

• Colocate: format.ts + format.test.ts. Name tests as behavior sentences: it('disables submit while the request is in flight').
• Arrange–Act–Assert, one behavior per test. Shared setup in a plain setup() factory function returning what tests need — avoid sprawling beforeEach mutation.
• No logic in tests (if/loops computing expectations). Expected values are literals.

Testing Library rules

• Query priority (same list as testing-playwright): getByRole (with name) > getByLabelText > getByText > getByTestId (last resort, added deliberately). Never query by placeholder — a placeholder is not a label (see a11y); needing it means the input lacks one.
• All interactions via userEvent (const user = userEvent.setup()), never fireEvent — userEvent fires the full real event sequence.
• Async UI: await screen.findByRole(...) / waitFor for assertions only — never waitFor containing a user action, never arbitrary setTimeout sleeps.
• Wrap components needing providers with a shared renderWithProviders test util — one definition, not per-file copies.

Mocking policy — mock at the boundary, not the module graph

• Network: MSW handlers, not vi.mock-ing your own fetch wrapper. Tests then survive refactors of the data layer.
• vi.mock only for true externals (analytics SDK, payment widget) and module-level non-determinism. If you're mocking your own module to make a test pass, the design or the test level is wrong.
• Non-determinism: vi.useFakeTimers() + vi.setSystemTime() for time; always vi.useRealTimers() in afterEach. With fake timers + userEvent, configure advanceTimers: vi.advanceTimersByTime.
• vi.restoreAllMocks() in afterEach (or restoreMocks: true in config) — leaked mocks cause order-dependent flake.

Config

• Single source: define test in vite.config.ts (or merge it) so aliases/plugins match the app. environment: 'jsdom' only for DOM test projects; pure-logic tests run in node (faster) — use Vitest projects to split.
• Coverage is a signal, not a goal: review uncovered branches, don't chase a number with assertion-free tests.
• A test that fails intermittently is a bug to fix now (usually unawaited async or shared state) — never retry-loop or skip it.