메뉴
Use when the research task is in astronomy — observational astronomy, surveys, photometry and astrophysical inference — at study design, analysis or writing. Astronomy: the figure is the unit of result, and nothing is reported pooled
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/tangxiangru/AutoR --skill astronomy-figure-is-the-unit-of-result명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Use when writing results and discussion, and when a task or a reviewer asks why an effect happens rather than whether it does. Covers the difference between reporting an effect and accounting for it, and what a mechanism claim needs behind it.
Use when the supplied data looks synthetic, degraded, incomplete or wrong, and whenever you are tempted to reframe the study around what you found about the inputs, the harness or the evaluation. Covers what to do with a real data problem without losing the study.
Use when planning figures, at study design and again before writing. Covers the figures a paper in this field is expected to contain, why an original figure does not substitute for a standard one, and how to decide what to draw first.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | astronomy-figure-is-the-unit-of-result |
| description | Use when the research task is in astronomy — observational astronomy, surveys, photometry and astrophysical inference — at study design, analysis or writing. Astronomy: the figure is the unit of result, and nothing is reported pooled |
Draft your figure list before your analysis list. In observational astronomy the result is delivered as a figure a reader can lay beside the published one: the same quantities on both axes, the same log or linear scaling, the same decade span, the full family of competing models or method variants overlaid on one set of axes, the decision threshold drawn as a labelled line, and a caption stating the numbers a reader would otherwise have to read off the plot (N, median, confidence level, how many points fall each side of the line). A result that is scientifically equivalent but visually reorganised, or that exists only as a table or a sentence, will not be recognised as that result.
Nothing is reported only as an aggregate. Break every quantity down by the sub-population the data physically distinguish, per object, per source class, per component index, per bin of the independent variable, quantify the trend across that index, and say which component dominates the budget and by what factor. Where several independent indicators, models or approximations exist for one quantity, put them all on a single axis and quantify their disagreement; where two independent routes measure the same object, state the consistency with a significance.
Present the result as a curve over the scanned variable across its full plausible range, log axes when it spans decades, and state the interval over which the claim actually holds, rather than a value at one point.
Seven of Astronomy's twelve criteria are image-typed and carry 60% of the weight, judged by a vision model that is shown the original figure first. The measured mechanism 'right numbers, wrong artifact class' cost a whole criterion: the agent had the residual information in prose and in a differently-shaped bar chart and scored near zero because the demanded panel was never drawn. The decomposition clause fixes the recurring aggregate-only loss, and the single-axis multi-indicator clause fixes the case where the canonical multi-model comparison figure was never produced (score 0) because the agent's own question did not need it.