Generate a WHS audit criteria checklist for any Australian jurisdiction and industry. Typically routed to by the request-router skill for audit preparation work, or invoked directly by name (e.g. "build an audit checklist", "generate audit criteria", "create a checklist for [industry]"). Also trigger on /criteria or /audit-criteria commands. The skill asks the user about jurisdiction and industry, conducts extensive online research (SafeWork Australia incident data, codes of practice, industry guidance), asks targeted follow-up questions about the specific workplace, and produces a completed audit criteria checklist as a .docx file ready for field use. Always use this skill rather than attempting to build a checklist from memory alone.
Conduct structured construction WHS audits using the Federal Safety Commissioner's Audit Criteria (Version 1.5, April 2024) as the benchmark. Supports two modes: FSC Accreditation Mode (for FSC-accredited builders on Commonwealth-funded projects) and General Construction Mode (using FSC criteria as best-practice benchmarks for any construction project). Typically routed to by the request-router skill for construction WHS work, or invoked directly by name (e.g. "run an FSC audit", "construction safety audit", "audit against FSC criteria"). Also trigger on /construction-audit or /fsc-audit commands. This skill references the safetysure-whs-legislation plugin for verified legislative text — it does not bundle its own legislation skills.
Australian WHS statistics and occupational hazard reference advisor for Safetysure consulting. Use when the user asks about occupational hazard profiles, injury mechanisms, industry injury rates, WCIFR benchmarks, national fatality or serious claims statistics, or WHS data for any occupation or industry. Three operating modes: (A) standalone hazard/statistics query — "what hazards do concreters face?", "what is the WCIFR for construction?", "what mechanisms cause most injuries?"; (B) hazard gap check — co-load alongside safetysure-swms or safetysure-audit-criteria to cross-check document controls against BOHD occupation hazard profiles; (C) risk assessment likelihood support — provides national data reference to inform likelihood ratings in risk registers and risk matrices for a given occupation/hazard. Also triggers on: "hazard profile", "BOHD data", "SWA statistics", "injury benchmark", "occupation risk", "national injury rate", "frequency rate", "incidence rate", "what injuries", "top hazards", "industry c
AIOH occupational hygiene exposure compliance decision framework based on the AIOH Compliance Decision Guide. Typically routed to by the request-router skill when occupational hygiene monitoring data is detected, or invoked directly by name (e.g. "run AIOH compliance analysis", "assess this SEG using aioh-compliance"). Use this skill for occupational exposure compliance assessment, AIOH compliance categories, UCL 95% compliance testing, U-parameter group compliance test, MVUE calculation, Land's exact method, exposure data treatment, lognormal distribution fitting, SEG compliance decisions, occupational hygiene statistics, exceedance fraction calculation, when to use UCL vs U-test, method disagreement guidance, or any question about interpreting occupational exposure monitoring data for compliance purposes. Also trigger when reviewing or generating occupational hygiene reports that reference AIOH methodology, workplace exposure standards, or statistical analysis of airborne contaminant data.
Structured QA/QC review agent for Safetysure WHS consulting reports. Typically routed to by the request-router skill when a WHS report is detected, or invoked directly by name (e.g. "run a report check", "QC this report using report-checker"). Use this skill for WHS report quality checking, QA/QC, peer review support, revision tracking, or sign-off verification. Also trigger when users ask about report quality, legislative citation accuracy, AGSM style compliance, findings register tracking, or whether a report meets Safetysure's internal review standards. Supports a 5-stage workflow: Draft (ad hoc reference), AI Check (full 8-pass review), Peer Review (targeted support), Revision (findings resolution), and Sign-off (final verification). Produces structured output with a findings register that tracks resolution across stages.
Conduct structured, practical SWMS (Safe Work Method Statement) compliance reviews against Australian WHS legislation for QLD, NSW, TAS, VIC, and WA jurisdictions. Typically routed to by the request-router skill when a SWMS is detected, or invoked directly by name (e.g. "run a SWMS review", "review this SWMS using swms-review"). Also trigger when users explicitly ask about SWMS content requirements, HRCW categories, or whether a SWMS meets regulatory standards. This skill references the safetysure-whs-legislation plugin for jurisdiction-specific WHS Act and Regulation checker skills to verify all legislative references before citing them. Produces prioritised, practical findings using a P1/P2/P3 framework based on risk level and timing.
Orchestrates writing comprehensive long documents section by section, breaking through Claude's single-response output limits. Each section gets full output capacity, then sections are assembled into a final .docx. PROACTIVE TRIGGER — Claude MUST invoke this skill automatically whenever a writing task would produce a document exceeding ~8,000 words. Estimate the total word count before starting. If it exceeds ~8,000 words, the outline has 6+ major sections, or a template is longer than 10 pages, load this skill and ask the user whether to break the work into sections. Do not attempt a single-pass write for documents of this size. Also trigger on: "write section by section", "incremental writer", "comprehensive report", "detailed document", "lengthy report", "full report", or when a template/outline implies a document that would be compressed in one pass. Works alongside domain-specific report skills (RCS, LOPA, construction audit) for writing orchestration.
Complete a WHS audit checklist by cross-referencing site visit observations and audio transcript notes against the audit criteria. Use this skill when the user has returned from a site audit and wants to "complete the checklist", "fill in the audit findings", "process my transcript against the checklist", "rate the checklist items", "draft the findings from my notes", "review my transcript and fill out the audit", or "turn my site visit notes into a completed checklist". Also trigger on /complete-checklist or /process-audit commands. Accepts a blank audit criteria checklist (.docx), manual on-site observations (typed or as part of the transcript doc), and an audio-to-text transcript (.docx or .txt). Asks methodology questions, cross-references all sources against each criterion, applies NC/OFI/OBS/C ratings, and produces a fully drafted completed checklist (.docx) for the auditor to review before it feeds into the audit report plugin. Always use this skill rather than rating checklist items manually.