메뉴
Adversarial QA comparing Quarto slides to Beamer benchmark. Run critic (find issues) then fixer (apply fixes); repeat until approved or max 5 rounds. Use when the user asks to QA Quarto vs Beamer or validate a lecture translation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Read MEMORY.md at session start and apply [LEARN:tag] corrections; when the user corrects you, append [LEARN:category] wrong → right to MEMORY.md. Use when starting work on this project or when the user gives a correction to remember.
Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks 13 patterns: narrative arc, notation density, pacing, motivation before formalism, worked examples, fragment reveals, box hierarchy. Use when the user asks for pedagogy or teaching-quality review of slides.
Run proofreading on lecture files (.tex or .qmd). Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic quality. Produces a report only; does not edit files. Use when the user asks to proofread slides or check grammar/typos in lecture content.
Review R scripts for code quality, reproducibility, and domain correctness. Checks set.seed, paths, structure, figure quality, and conventions. Use when the user asks to review R code or check scripts in scripts/R or Figures.
Run combined multi-dimensional slide review: visual audit, pedagogy review, and proofreading (and optionally TikZ parity). Use when the user asks for full or comprehensive slide review before a milestone.
Perform visual layout audit of Quarto or Beamer slides. Checks overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, and layout. Use when the user asks for a visual or layout audit of slides.
| name | qa-quarto |
| description | Adversarial QA comparing Quarto slides to Beamer benchmark. Run critic (find issues) then fixer (apply fixes); repeat until approved or max 5 rounds. Use when the user asks to QA Quarto vs Beamer or validate a lecture translation. |
Beamer PDF is the gold standard. Quarto must match or exceed it.
Critic phase: Compare Beamer (.tex/.pdf) and Quarto (.qmd/.html) for the lecture. List every issue (Critical / Major / Minor). Save to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_critic_roundN.md. If no blocking issues, state "APPROVED" and stop.
Fixer phase: Apply fixes from the critic report (Critical first, then Major, then Minor). Re-render Quarto. Do not self-approve.
Re-audit: Run critic again on the updated Quarto. If not APPROVED and rounds < 5, repeat from step 2. After 5 rounds, report remaining issues to the user.
Final report: Save quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_final.md with gate status and any remaining issues.
