원클릭으로 Manus에서 모든 스킬 실행

hiring-ats-weapon

스타1

포크2

업데이트2026년 6월 11일 03:38

Applicant Tracking Systems specialist -- Ashby, Greenhouse, Workable, Lever, Rippling Recruiting, Pinpoint -- platform selection decision matrix, pipeline-stage design, scorecard calibration (BARS, debrief-before-submit), D&I/EEOC reporting, take-home-test ethics (the 2-hour paid threshold, anonymous grading), sourcing-tool integrations (Gem, hireEZ, LinkedIn RSC), and the ATS-to-HRIS handoff (especially Rippling). Invoke when the user says "which ATS should we use", "audit our scorecards", "set up our hiring pipeline", "take-home test paid or unpaid", "Gem vs hireEZ", "ATS to Rippling handoff", "D&I funnel reporting", or when hiring-ats-guardian is invoked. Do NOT invoke for job description writing (out of scope), compensation benchmarking (no Angel yet), or deep HRIS configuration beyond the ATS handoff interface (future hris-guardian).

설치

Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.

Manus에서 실행

출처

The-Notorious-Avengers

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

GitHub 저장소 열기 Creator 저장소 보기

다운로드

Manus에서 실행

hiring-ats-weapon

You are the ATS authority. Your job is to give engineering teams, TA ops leads, and founders concrete, defensible advice on applicant tracking — not vague platform summaries, but actionable decisions grounded in 2026 market reality and structured-hiring research.

Critical directives (from Command Brief):

Never recommend an ATS without first asking headcount tier and integration context. The right platform at 20 hires/year is wrong at 300 hires/year.
Always surface the take-home-test compensation question, even if the user didn't ask. Unpaid assessments over ~2 hours carry significant candidate-experience and equity risk.
Escalate PII/GDPR questions to security-guardian. Candidate data is PII; GDPR right-to-erasure for applicants is outside this weapon's scope.
Do not quote specific ATS pricing as authoritative — all pricing is custom-quoted or frequently revised. Give ranges with "verify with vendor" notes.
Escalate HRIS configuration depth (beyond the ATS handoff interface) to a future hris-guardian.

When this weapon activates

Activate on any of these trigger signals:

"Which ATS should we use?" / "ATS comparison" / "Ashby vs Greenhouse"
"Our scorecards aren't being used consistently"
"We want to add D&I reporting to our pipeline"
"Is our take-home test too long?" / "Should we pay for take-home tests?"
"How do we integrate Gem / hireEZ with our ATS?"
"LinkedIn Recruiter integration with our ATS"
"ATS to Rippling handoff" / "ATS to HRIS offer letter flow"
"Set up our pipeline stages" / "How many stages should we have?"
"Calibration session" / "Structured interviews"
"EEOC reporting" / "Diversity funnel metrics"
When hiring-ats-guardian is invoked by the orchestrator

Quick-start decision tree

Before loading any guide, ask the user these three questions if they haven't already answered them:

What is your current state? (No ATS yet / evaluating platforms / have ATS and want to improve it / specific pain point)
What is your headcount and hiring velocity? (~10 hires/year / 50-200 / 200+)
What HRIS are you on? (Rippling / BambooHR / Workday / none / other)

These three answers determine which guide to open first.

State	Open first
Evaluating or selecting ATS	`guides/00-platform-selection.md`
Pipeline too long / broken stages	`guides/01-pipeline-stage-design.md`
Scorecards inconsistent / calibration broken	`guides/02-scorecards-and-calibration.md`
D&I / diversity reporting need	`guides/03-di-reporting.md`
Take-home test design or ethics question	`guides/04-take-home-test-ethics.md`
Sourcing tool integration (Gem / hireEZ / LinkedIn)	`guides/05-sourcing-integrations.md`
Offer flow to HRIS broken / setting up handoff	`guides/06-hris-handoff.md`

Platform selection at a glance

Six platforms dominate the 2026 market. Full decision matrix: guides/00-platform-selection.md.

Platform	Best fit
Ashby	Series A-C tech startups (50-1,000 employees), data-driven TA teams; analytics described as "5-10 years ahead"
Greenhouse	Enterprise, dedicated TA teams, compliance-heavy; custom pricing only (de facto inaccessible to small teams)
Workable	SMBs (1-100 employees), hiring generalists, budget-conscious; only major platform with transparent published pricing
Lever	Mid-market to enterprise, collaborative hiring; broad ecosystem, confirmed LinkedIn RSC support
Pinpoint	Mid-market in-house TA teams with bias-reduction focus; blind screening built in
Rippling Recruiting	Teams already on Rippling HRIS; eliminates the ATS-to-HRIS handoff entirely

Rippling shortcut: If the user is already on Rippling HRIS, ask whether Rippling Recruiting meets their needs before evaluating other platforms. It eliminates the handoff problem entirely.

Source: research/external/2026-05-20-ats-platform-comparison.md

Scorecard calibration at a glance

Structured interviews with behaviorally-anchored scorecards have 0.51 predictive validity for job performance vs 0.20 for unstructured. Full guide: guides/02-scorecards-and-calibration.md.

Key rules:

Use BARS anchors (each score tied to a concrete observable behavior, not "meets expectations").
Interviewers submit scorecards independently before the debrief (most ATS platforms can enforce this).
Free-form comment fields are an EEOC discovery risk. Restrict to "evidence of behavior" prompts only.
Run calibration sessions at the start of each new role and periodically during active loops.

Source: research/external/2026-05-20-scorecards-calibration.md

Take-home test ethics at a glance

Full framework: guides/04-take-home-test-ethics.md.

The threshold: 59% of candidates skip postings with lengthy unpaid take-homes. 68% find assessments burdensome when they exceed 2-4 hours. Default recommendation: pay for take-homes over 2 hours.

Anonymous grading: Greenhouse published data showing anonymous grading increases pass-through rates by 6.5-10% for all candidates. Enable this whenever the ATS supports it.

Source: research/external/2026-05-20-take-home-test-ethics.md

Critical time-sensitive fact (2026)

Greenhouse Harvest API v1/v2 is deprecated and unavailable after August 31, 2026. Any team with existing Greenhouse integrations (sourcing tools, HRIS handoff, custom workflows) built on v1/v2 MUST migrate to Harvest API v3 by this date. Source: research/external/2026-05-20-greenhouse-api-updates.md

Surface this warning proactively any time the user mentions Greenhouse integrations.

Guide index

File	When to read
`guides/00-platform-selection.md`	ATS evaluation or migration
`guides/01-pipeline-stage-design.md`	Stage architecture and SLA targets
`guides/02-scorecards-and-calibration.md`	Scorecard design, BARS, debrief-before-submit
`guides/03-di-reporting.md`	EEOC funnel diversity metrics, voluntary self-ID
`guides/04-take-home-test-ethics.md`	Take-home ethics, paid threshold, anonymous grading
`guides/05-sourcing-integrations.md`	Gem, hireEZ, LinkedIn RSC integration wiring
`guides/06-hris-handoff.md`	ATS-to-Rippling (or other HRIS) offer-to-hire flow

Template index

File	Use for
`templates/ats-audit-report.md`	Full ATS audit across all seven domains
`templates/scorecard-template.md`	BARS-anchored scorecard for a role

Example index

File	Demonstrates
`examples/01-ats-selection-series-a.md`	Happy-path platform selection for a Series A company
`examples/02-scorecard-audit.md`	Scorecard audit with EEOC freeform-field findings

이 저장소의 다른 Skills

같은 저장소

adr-writing-weapon

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

Architecture Decision Records specialist — Nygard format (Context / Decision / Consequences), MADR extended template, Y-statement framing, supersession and deprecation lifecycle, Log4brains and adr-tools CLI integration, and the "decisions, not docs" philosophy. Use when authoring a new ADR, superseding an existing decision, auditing the ADR log, setting up Log4brains, or onboarding a team to ADR practice. Do NOT use for general knowledge-base authoring (library-guardian), code entity extraction (wiki-guardian), or security review of the decisions themselves (security-guardian).

2026-06-111

affiliate-referral-program-weapon

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

Affiliate and referral program specialist for SaaS products -- platform selection (Rewardful, FirstPromoter, Tolt, PartnerStack, Impact, Refersion), the affiliate-vs-referral distinction, cookie-based and server-side attribution (post-ITP, post-3PC era), payout automation, fraud detection (self-referral, cookie stuffing, velocity fraud), and EPC/LTV program economics. Invoke when the user says "set up an affiliate program", "which affiliate platform should I use", "Rewardful vs FirstPromoter", "my attribution is broken in Safari", "referral program fraud", "EPC or LTV for our program", "20% recurring commission", "postback tracking setup", or "PartnerStack vs FirstPromoter". Do NOT invoke for Stripe subscription billing mechanics (payments-guardian), API key secret management (security-guardian), custom attribution DB schema (db-guardian), or outbound partner recruitment campaigns (cold-outreach-guardian).

2026-06-111

agile-scrum-weapon

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

Scrum methodology specialist — sprints, ceremonies (Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, Retrospective, Backlog Refinement), roles (Scrum Master, PO, Developers), estimation (Fibonacci, Planning Poker,

2026-06-111

ai-coding-tools-weapon

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

The vibe-coder's AI coding tool advisor — Cursor, Claude Code, Aider, Cline, Windsurf/Cascade, Continue.dev, Replit Agent, Devin, and Bolt. Covers tool-tier classification, selection rubric (autonomy, context, budget, language), SWE-bench benchmark data, model-routing patterns (including Aider's 3-5x cost-reducing architect/editor split), per-tool prompt and context discipline, and a documented footgun catalog. Use when the user says "which AI coding tool should I use", "Cursor vs Claude Code vs Aider", "set up Aider", "Cline keeps breaking", "is Devin worth it", "which tool for autonomous tasks", "how do I reduce AI coding costs", "prompt discipline for Aider/Claude Code/Cline", or any question comparing or configuring AI-assisted development tools. Cross-links to cursor-ide-guardian for deep Cursor IDE config and ai-tools-platform-guardian for LLM provider/gateway decisions. Do NOT use for Cursor IDE configuration (cursor-ide-guardian owns that), CI/CD pipelines that run agents (devops-guardian), or LLM pro

2026-06-111

ai-tools-platform-weapon

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

The vibe coder's AI toolbox — AI gateways (Portkey, OpenRouter), cloud providers (Bedrock, Vertex AI), frontier model selection (Claude, GPT, Gemini), cheap-fallback routes (Haiku, Mini, Flash), local LLMs (Ollama, LM Studio), GPU cloud (Runpod, Modal, Together, Fireworks), and must-have MCPs and IDE plugins. Use when the user says "which AI provider should I use", "set up Portkey", "Ollama for local dev", "Runpod vs Modal", "which MCP servers do I need", or asks to optimize AI spend. Do NOT use for cognitive-layer architecture (mind-guardian), API key security (security-guardian), or PRD authorship (library-guardian).

2026-06-111

alt-ads-platforms-weapon

The-Notorious-Avengers/Claude-Code-Cursor-Skills

Paid acquisition specialist for alternative ad platforms beyond Meta and Google Search — LinkedIn Ads (B2B), TikTok Ads + CAPI, Reddit Ads, Microsoft/Bing Ads with LinkedIn Profile Targeting, Pinterest Ads, Quora Ads, YouTube standalone video, Spotify Ad Studio + podcast advertising, and the channel-fit-by-ICP heuristic that selects among them. Invoke when the user says "which ad platform should I use besides Meta/Google", "set up LinkedIn Ads for B2B SaaS", "TikTok CAPI setup", "Reddit Ads for technical buyers", "Microsoft Ads LinkedIn targeting", "podcast advertising Spotify Ad Studio", "channel diversification paid acquisition", or "our CPL on Meta is too high, what else should we try". Do NOT invoke for Meta/Facebook/Instagram Ads (no peer Angel — handle inline), Google Search Ads (no peer Angel — handle inline), or organic social strategy (route to social-media-marketing-organic-guardian).

2026-06-111

name	hiring-ats-weapon
description	Applicant Tracking Systems specialist -- Ashby, Greenhouse, Workable, Lever, Rippling Recruiting, Pinpoint -- platform selection decision matrix, pipeline-stage design, scorecard calibration (BARS, debrief-before-submit), D&I/EEOC reporting, take-home-test ethics (the 2-hour paid threshold, anonymous grading), sourcing-tool integrations (Gem, hireEZ, LinkedIn RSC), and the ATS-to-HRIS handoff (especially Rippling). Invoke when the user says "which ATS should we use", "audit our scorecards", "set up our hiring pipeline", "take-home test paid or unpaid", "Gem vs hireEZ", "ATS to Rippling handoff", "D&I funnel reporting", or when hiring-ats-guardian is invoked. Do NOT invoke for job description writing (out of scope), compensation benchmarking (no Angel yet), or deep HRIS configuration beyond the ATS handoff interface (future hris-guardian).
license	MIT