원클릭으로
create-prd
Create a comprehensive Product Requirements Document from conversation context
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Create a comprehensive Product Requirements Document from conversation context
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Deep code review of a diff across both Orbit repos against one shared rubric, orchestrating the five review subagents and a backward-compat guard. Use when the user asks to review a PR, file, folder, or staged changes in orbit-ui-mobile or orbit-api. Replaces /review and /security-review.
Get an independent cross-model second opinion (GLM-5.2 via opencode) on a specific, load-bearing technical claim or a Critical code-review finding — a different model reads the claim + code and returns AGREE / DISAGREE / UNSURE. Use to stress-test a single Critical finding, a risky assertion, or a close call before you commit to it. Auto-fired inside /pr-review on each Critical finding that survives the skeptic. Not for open-ended research (use /deep-research) or multi-lens judgement (use /llm-council).
Break a PRD into GitHub issues across orbit-ui-mobile + orbit-api
Answer an open-ended "what's the best way to…?" question with orchestrated multi-agent deep web research. Decompose the question, fan out narrow research subagents in parallel, verify the load-bearing claims adversarially, iterate to saturation, then synthesize ONE opinionated, source-backed, decision-ready recommendation. Orbit-aware (dual-repo stack, solo-dev cost calibration). Use for technology/vendor choices, architecture & tooling decisions, cost comparisons, migration approaches, or best-practice questions — anything whose answer needs current external evidence beyond the codebase. Not for code edits, single-fact lookups, or questions answerable from the repo alone.
Create implementation plan with cross-repo codebase analysis
Prime agent with Orbit project context (both repos + optional GitHub issue)
Generate a comprehensive Product Requirements Document (PRD) for Orbit based on the current conversation context. Use the structure below.
Output file name: $ARGUMENTS with any --research/--no-research flag stripped (default: PRD.md)
Output directory: .claude/PRDs/
Orbit ships from two repositories that move together. Every PRD section that touches behavior must declare scope across:
apps/web, apps/mobile, packages/shared) in thomasluizon/orbit-ui-mobile.NET 10 API) in thomasluizon/orbit-apiCross-platform parity (apps/web ↔ apps/mobile) is mandatory per CLAUDE.md. Call out any web-or-mobile-only intent explicitly.
1. Executive Summary
2. Mission
3. Target Users
4. Scope
In Scope (checkboxes), grouped: Frontend, Backend, Shared
Out of Scope (checkboxes) with rationale
Repo Touch Matrix:
| Capability | Frontend | Backend | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | yes/no | yes/no | yes/no |
5. User Stories
frontend, backend, or both6. Architecture & Patterns
7. API Contract (if backend changes)
packages/shared/src/api/endpoints.ts)packages/shared/src/types/)8. UI/UX (if frontend changes)
9. Data Model
packages/shared/src/query/keys.ts10. Security & Configuration
11. Success Criteria
12. Implementation Phases
13. Risks & Mitigations
14. Open Questions
/create-storiesReview conversation history. Identify explicit requirements, implicit needs, constraints, and success criteria.
If critical information is missing, ask clarifying questions before generating. Wait for user response.
Most PRDs need NO web research — they extend Orbit's existing product surface. Reach for /deep-research only when the PRODUCT approach has a genuine unknown.
Trigger deep-research when EITHER:
--research was passed (force it), ORSkip (the common case) when the PRD extends an existing feature, the approach mirrors something Orbit already ships, or --no-research was passed. Note in one line that research was skipped.
How: invoke /deep-research "<the specific open question>" scoped to the decision. Fold its findings into §6 Architecture & Patterns, §13 Risks & Mitigations, and §14 Open Questions (with cited sources). Keep the PRD the source of truth; attach research as evidence, not a prose dump.
Guardrail — Orbit posture wins. Research informs; it does not override Orbit's product posture, design canon (DESIGN.md), or the cross-platform-parity mandate. When a finding conflicts, the Orbit choice wins and the PRD records the deviation and why.
Organize into sections. Fill reasonable assumptions where details are missing. Maintain consistency.
Write the PRD. Use markdown. Concrete examples over abstractions. Include code snippets for technical sections.
frontend / backend / both## PRD Created
**File**: `.claude/PRDs/{name}`
**Product**: {name}
**Problem**: {one line}
**Solution**: {one line}
### Summary
- {N} user stories
- {N} in-scope capabilities
- {N} phases
- Repos touched: frontend / backend / both
### Assumptions Made
{list or "None"}
### Recommended Next Steps
1. Review with stakeholders
2. Resolve open questions
3. Run `/create-stories .claude/PRDs/{name}` to break into issues