메뉴
Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Extract creative intent from images into executable build specs. Activates on images + build intent, "image to mission", "i2m", or capturing visual energy in code/design.
Unit Circle Laboratory + sc-dev-team autonomous mission control. Provides human-in-the-loop automation layer, pipeline management, context lifecycle, stuck-state prevention. UC re-execution series and dev branch milestones. Adapted from uc-lab pattern for code plan/execute/verify/complete. Auto-activates during UC milestone work; trigger: user says 'bring up the dev team'.
Generate intelligence briefings for the planning dashboard. Use this skill whenever a request file appears in `.planning/console/inbox/pending/` whose `type` field starts with `intelligence.` (refresh_briefing, triage_finding, snapshot_diff, investigate_section, dismiss_finding). The skill reads the per-project KB at `.gsd/intelligence/intelligence.db`, synthesizes a briefing with a causal hypothesis + acknowledged uncertainty + confidence label and ranked moves, then writes the result back to the KB. Always trigger this skill for these request types — do not generate briefings manually.
Sketched Isotropic Gaussian Regularization primitive. Scalar loss matching the embedding distribution to a standard-normal target via Cramér-Wold slicing and the Epps-Pulley empirical characteristic function test. Port of rbalestr-lab/lejepa (MIT). Default-off in v1.49.571.
Adversarial spec-compliance PR review — cross-references diffs against approved specs, verifies runtime claims against source, detects competing PRs, audits scope/convention compliance. Use before merging.
Pick among candidate outputs (code, configs, plans) by running them on diverse inputs and clustering by behavioural fingerprint, rather than by textual aggregation or log-probability. Activates when an executor returns multiple plausible candidates that need disambiguation, when output-majority voting would be the default choice, or when reviewing generated code that has not yet been validated. The 2026 evidence (Semantic Voting, arxiv 2605.08680v1) is that any execution-based selector dominates output-majority voting by 19-52pp; sketch-generated inputs beat random fuzz by 11.3pp. Triggers: "pick the best candidate", "majority vote on code", "select from N samples", "validate the generated output", "behavioural verification".
| name | decision-framework |
| description | Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| format | "2025-10-02T00:00:00.000Z" |
| triggers | ["evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing"] |
| updated | "2026-04-25T00:00:00.000Z" |
| status | ACTIVE |
| Situation | Framework |
|---|---|
| Challenge assumptions | First Principles |
| Find root cause | 5 Whys |
| Prioritize tasks | Eisenhower Matrix |
| Focus effort | Pareto 80/20 |
| Identify risks | Inversion |
| Map consequences | Second-Order Thinking |
| Compare options | Decision Matrix |
First Principles: State problem → list assumptions → challenge each → identify fundamentals → build from truths.
5 Whys: State problem → ask "why?" iteratively → verify chain backwards → act on deepest cause.
Eisenhower: Urgent+Important (do), Not-Urgent+Important (schedule), Urgent+Not-Important (delegate), Neither (eliminate).
Pareto: List items → measure impact → sort → find ~20% driving ~80% → focus there.
Inversion: State goal → "what guarantees failure?" → list failure modes → invert into prevention.
Second-Order: Map effects → map what THOSE cause → find hidden costs → decide with full picture.
Decision Matrix: List options → weighted criteria → score each → sum → sanity check winner.
