메뉴
Researches a topic from the last 30 days on Reddit, X, and the web. Surfaces real community discussions with engagement metrics and synthesizes findings into actionable insights. Use when the user wants to know what people are saying about a topic right now.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. 30c5c8d (Update humanizer plugin to upstream v2.2.0)
Expert guidance for ffuf web fuzzing during authorized penetration testing. Covers directory discovery, subdomain enumeration, parameter fuzzing, authenticated fuzzing with raw requests, auto-calibration, and result analysis. Use when running ffuf scans, analyzing ffuf output, or building fuzzing strategies for web targets.
Implements file-based planning for complex multi-step tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md as persistent working memory. Use when starting tasks requiring >5 tool calls, multi-phase projects, research, or any work where losing track of goals and progress would be costly.
Extracts reusable skills from work sessions. Use when: (1) a non-obvious problem was solved worth preserving, (2) a pattern was discovered that would help future sessions, (3) a workaround or debugging technique needs documentation. Manual invocation only via /skill-extractor command - no automatic triggers or hooks.
Provides web vulnerability testing methodology distilled from 88,636 real-world cases from the WooYun vulnerability database (2010-2016). Use when performing penetration testing, security audits, code reviews for security flaws, or vulnerability research. Covers SQL injection, XSS, command execution, file upload, path traversal, unauthorized access, information disclosure, and business logic flaws.
Teaches agents to recognize and avoid security threats during normal activity. Covers phishing detection, credential protection, domain verification, and social engineering defense. Use when building or operating agents that access email, credential vaults, web browsers, or sensitive data.
| name | last30days |
| description | Researches a topic from the last 30 days on Reddit, X, and the web. Surfaces real community discussions with engagement metrics and synthesizes findings into actionable insights. Use when the user wants to know what people are saying about a topic right now. |
| argument-hint | nano banana pro prompts, NVIDIA news, best AI video tools |
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read","Write","AskUserQuestion","WebSearch","mcp__exa__web_search_exa"] |
Research ANY topic across Reddit, X, and the web. Surface what people are actually discussing, recommending, and debating right now.
Before doing anything, parse the user's input for:
Common patterns:
[topic] for [tool] -> "web mockups for Nano Banana Pro" -> TOOL IS SPECIFIED[topic] prompts for [tool] -> "UI design prompts for Midjourney" -> TOOL IS SPECIFIED[topic] -> "iOS design mockups" -> TOOL NOT SPECIFIED, that's OKIMPORTANT: Do NOT ask about target tool before research.
Store these variables:
TOPIC = [extracted topic]TARGET_TOOL = [extracted tool, or "unknown" if not specified]QUERY_TYPE = [RECOMMENDATIONS | NEWS | HOW-TO | GENERAL]DISPLAY your parsing to the user. Before running any tools, output:
I'll research {TOPIC} across Reddit, X, and the web to find what's been discussed in the last 30 days.
Parsed intent:
- TOPIC = {TOPIC}
- TARGET_TOOL = {TARGET_TOOL or "unknown"}
- QUERY_TYPE = {QUERY_TYPE}
Starting now.
If TARGET_TOOL is known, mention it in the intro: "...to find {QUERY_TYPE}-style content for use in {TARGET_TOOL}."
This text MUST appear before you call any tools. It confirms to the user that you understood their request.
Step 1: Run the research script
python3 "{baseDir}/scripts/last30days.py" "$ARGUMENTS" --emit=compact 2>&1
The script will automatically:
The script auto-detects sources (API keys, etc). While waiting for it, do WebSearch.
For ALL modes, do WebSearch to supplement (or provide all data in web-only mode).
Choose search queries based on QUERY_TYPE:
If RECOMMENDATIONS ("best X", "top X", "what X should I use"):
best {TOPIC} recommendations{TOPIC} list examplesmost popular {TOPIC}If NEWS ("what's happening with X", "X news"):
{TOPIC} news 2026{TOPIC} announcement updateIf PROMPTING ("X prompts", "prompting for X"):
{TOPIC} prompts examples 2026{TOPIC} techniques tipsIf GENERAL (default):
{TOPIC} 2026{TOPIC} discussionFor ALL query types:
Options (passed through from user's command):
--days=N -> Look back N days instead of 30 (e.g., --days=7 for weekly roundup)--quick -> Faster, fewer sources (8-12 each)--deep -> Comprehensive (50-70 Reddit, 40-60 X)After all searches complete, internally synthesize (don't display stats yet):
The Judge Agent must:
Do NOT display stats here - they come at the end, right before the invitation.
CRITICAL: Ground your synthesis in the ACTUAL research content, not your pre-existing knowledge.
Read the research output carefully. Pay attention to:
ANTI-PATTERN TO AVOID: If user asks about "clawdbot skills" and research returns ClawdBot content (self-hosted AI agent), do NOT synthesize this as "Claude Code skills" just because both involve "skills". Read what the research actually says.
CRITICAL: Extract SPECIFIC NAMES, not generic patterns.
When user asks "best X" or "top X", they want a LIST of specific things:
BAD synthesis for "best Claude Code skills":
"Skills are powerful. Keep them under 500 lines. Use progressive disclosure."
GOOD synthesis for "best Claude Code skills":
"Most mentioned skills: /commit (5 mentions), remotion skill (4x), git-worktree (3x), /pr (3x). The Remotion announcement got 16K likes on X."
Identify from the ACTUAL RESEARCH OUTPUT:
Display in this EXACT sequence:
FIRST - What I learned (based on QUERY_TYPE):
If RECOMMENDATIONS - Show specific things mentioned with sources:
Most mentioned:
[Tool Name] - {n}x mentions
Use Case: [what it does]
Sources: @handle1, @handle2, r/sub, blog.com
[Tool Name] - {n}x mentions
Use Case: [what it does]
Sources: @handle3, r/sub2, Complex
Notable mentions: [other specific things with 1-2 mentions]
CRITICAL for RECOMMENDATIONS:
If PROMPTING/NEWS/GENERAL - Show synthesis and patterns:
CITATION RULE: Cite sources sparingly to prove research is real.
CITATION PRIORITY (most to least preferred):
The tool's value is surfacing what PEOPLE are saying, not what journalists wrote. When both a web article and an X post cover the same fact, cite the X post.
URL FORMATTING: NEVER paste raw URLs in the output.
BAD: "His album is set for March 20 (per Rolling Stone; Billboard; Complex)." GOOD: "His album BULLY drops March 20 -- fans on X are split on the tracklist, per @honest30bgfan_" GOOD: "Ye's apology got massive traction on r/hiphopheads" OK (web, only when Reddit/X don't have it): "The Hellwatt Festival runs July 4-18 at RCF Arena, per Billboard"
Lead with people, not publications. Start each topic with what Reddit/X users are saying/feeling, then add web context only if needed. The user came here for the conversation, not the press release.
What I learned:
**{Topic 1}** -- [1-2 sentences about what people are saying, per @handle or r/sub]
**{Topic 2}** -- [1-2 sentences, per @handle or r/sub]
**{Topic 3}** -- [1-2 sentences, per @handle or r/sub]
KEY PATTERNS from the research:
1. [Pattern] -- per @handle
2. [Pattern] -- per r/sub
3. [Pattern] -- per @handle
THEN - Stats (right before invitation):
CRITICAL: Calculate actual totals from the research output.
[Xlikes, Yrt] from each X post, [Xpts, Ycmt] from RedditCopy this EXACTLY, replacing only the {placeholders}:
---
All agents reported back!
|- Reddit: {N} threads | {N} upvotes | {N} comments
|- X: {N} posts | {N} likes | {N} reposts (via xAI)
|- Web: {N} pages (supplementary)
|- Top voices: @{handle1} ({N} likes), @{handle2} | r/{sub1}, r/{sub2}
---
If Reddit returned 0 threads, write: "|- Reddit: 0 threads (no results this cycle)"
SELF-CHECK before displaying: Re-read your "What I learned" section. Does it match what the research ACTUALLY says? If you catch yourself projecting your own knowledge instead of the research, rewrite it.
LAST - Invitation (adapt to QUERY_TYPE):
CRITICAL: Every invitation MUST include 2-3 specific example suggestions based on what you ACTUALLY learned from the research. Don't be generic -- show the user you absorbed the content by referencing real things from the results.
If QUERY_TYPE = PROMPTING:
---
I'm now an expert on {TOPIC} for {TARGET_TOOL}. What do you want to make? For example:
- [specific idea based on popular technique from research]
- [specific idea based on trending style/approach from research]
- [specific idea riffing on what people are actually creating]
Just describe your vision and I'll write a prompt you can paste straight into {TARGET_TOOL}.
If QUERY_TYPE = RECOMMENDATIONS:
---
I'm now an expert on {TOPIC}. Want me to go deeper? For example:
- [Compare specific item A vs item B from the results]
- [Explain why item C is trending right now]
- [Help you get started with item D]
If QUERY_TYPE = NEWS:
---
I'm now an expert on {TOPIC}. Some things you could ask:
- [Specific follow-up question about the biggest story]
- [Question about implications of a key development]
- [Question about what might happen next based on current trajectory]
If QUERY_TYPE = GENERAL:
---
I'm now an expert on {TOPIC}. Some things I can help with:
- [Specific question based on the most discussed aspect]
- [Specific creative/practical application of what you learned]
- [Deeper dive into a pattern or debate from the research]
Example invitations (to show the quality bar):
For /last30days nano banana pro prompts for Gemini:
I'm now an expert on Nano Banana Pro for Gemini. What do you want to make? For example:
- Photorealistic product shots with natural lighting (the most requested style right now)
- Logo designs with embedded text (Gemini's new strength per the research)
- Multi-reference style transfer from a mood board
Just describe your vision and I'll write a prompt you can paste straight into Gemini.
For /last30days kanye west (GENERAL):
I'm now an expert on Kanye West. Some things I can help with:
- What's the real story behind the apology letter -- genuine or PR move?
- Break down the BULLY tracklist reactions and what fans are expecting
- Compare how Reddit vs X are reacting to the Bianca narrative
For /last30days war in Iran (NEWS):
I'm now an expert on the Iran situation. Some things you could ask:
- What are the realistic escalation scenarios from here?
- How is this playing differently in US vs international media?
- What's the economic impact on oil markets so far?
After showing the stats summary with your invitation, STOP and wait for the user to respond.
Read their response and match the intent:
Only write a prompt when the user wants one. Don't force a prompt on someone who asked "what could happen next with Iran."
When the user wants a prompt, write a single, highly-tailored prompt using your research expertise.
If research says to use a specific prompt FORMAT, YOU MUST USE THAT FORMAT.
ANTI-PATTERN: Research says "use JSON prompts with device specs" but you write plain prose. This defeats the entire purpose of the research.
Here's your prompt for {TARGET_TOOL}:
---
[The actual prompt IN THE FORMAT THE RESEARCH RECOMMENDS]
---
This uses [brief 1-line explanation of what research insight you applied].
Only if they ask for alternatives or more prompts, provide 2-3 variations. Don't dump a prompt pack unless requested.
After delivering a prompt, offer to write more:
Want another prompt? Just tell me what you're creating next.
For the rest of this conversation, remember:
CRITICAL: After research is complete, you are now an EXPERT on this topic.
When the user asks follow-up questions:
Only do new research if the user explicitly asks about a DIFFERENT topic.
After delivering a prompt, end with:
---
Expert in: {TOPIC} for {TARGET_TOOL}
Based on: {n} Reddit threads ({sum} upvotes) + {n} X posts ({sum} likes) + {n} web pages
Want another prompt? Just tell me what you're creating next.