executing-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | executing-plans |
| description | Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints |
Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
Note: Tell your human partner that Superpowers works much better with access to subagents. The quality of its work will be significantly higher if run on a platform with subagent support (such as Claude Code or Codex). If subagents are available, use superpowers:subagent-driven-development instead of this skill.
Fallbacks for local project copies: If referenced workflow skills such as using-git-worktrees or finishing-a-development-branch are not available in the current environment, continue with the closest local equivalent instead of blocking. In this repository, that means: verify the current branch/worktree state yourself before editing, then finish by running the planned verification commands plus the local requesting-code-review and empirical-prompt-tuning completion flow. If the repository has no HEAD yet (for example, an initial uncommitted repo), do not block on commit-range review. Define the review scope as the current uncommitted target files, run a file-level static review against the plan/requirements, and report that the no-HEAD fallback path was used.
If branch or worktree creation is blocked by the sandbox, do not stall the task solely for that reason. Record that branch isolation could not be established in the current environment, avoid destructive git operations, and continue with focused file edits plus explicit verification.
?content=) and preserve them through normalization and tests rather than rebuilding URLs from pathname aloneFor each task:
After all tasks complete and verified:
HEAD, explicitly say that range-based review is unavailable, review the current uncommitted target files instead, and treat that as the completion-review checkpoint.STOP executing immediately when:
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Required workflow skills: