manuscript-review

name	manuscript-review
description	模擬同行審稿與報告指引合規性檢查框架。 LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: peer review、同行審查、reviewer、審稿、reporting guidelines、CONSORT、STROBE、PRISMA、CARE、critique、檢查稿件、稿件問題 CAPABILITIES: 純指令技能，搭配 read_draft MCP tool 讀取草稿內容。LLM 用醫學知識做審查，比 regex 更準確。

稿件審查與報告指引技能

LLM 語意理解 > regex 關鍵字匹配。資料用 read_draft MCP tool，審查邏輯由 LLM + domain knowledge。

觸發：審查草稿、reviewer、CONSORT、STROBE、PRISMA、CARE、投稿前檢查

搭配 MCP Tools

工具	用途
read_draft	必用 — 讀草稿
list_drafts	列出可審查的草稿
count_words	字數統計
check_formatting	期刊格式量化檢查 + 跨文件一致性

---

Framework 1: Peer Review

用 read_draft 取得內容 → 按 4 面向審查 → 輸出結構化報告

審查面向

1. Structure：必要章節齊全、Abstract 結構化、邏輯順序（Major if 缺少/亂序）

2. Methods：

項目	Major/Minor
Ethics/IRB statement	Major
Statistical methods	Major
Sample size justification	Minor
Primary outcome definition	Minor
Inclusion/exclusion criteria	Minor

3. Statistics：

項目	Major/Minor
Confidence intervals	Major
P-value reporting (精確值)	Minor
Multiple comparisons correction	Minor
Effect size	Minor

4. Writing：

項目	Major/Minor
Limitations section	Major
Causal language in observational	Major
Word count / Reference density	Minor

判定

Major ≥3 → 🔴 Major revision required | 1-2 → 🟡 Major revision | 0 → ✅ Minor/Accept

---

Framework 2: Reporting Guideline Compliance

read_draft → 自動偵測/指定 guideline → 逐項檢查 → 合規報告

Auto-Detection

草稿特徵	指引
randomized, RCT, blinded, placebo	CONSORT
systematic review, meta-analysis	PRISMA
case report, case presentation	CARE
observational, cohort, case-control	STROBE

CONSORT (RCT, 21 items)

Title(1), Abstract(2), Intro(3-4: background, objectives), Methods(5-13: design, eligibility, interventions, outcomes, sample size, randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, statistics), Results(14-19: flow, recruitment, baseline, N analysed, outcomes+CI, harms), Discussion(20: interpretation+limitations), Other(21: registration)

STROBE (Observational, 16 items)

Title(1), Intro(2-3), Methods(4-11: design, setting, participants, variables, measurement, bias, sample size, statistics), Results(12-14: participants, descriptive, outcome), Discussion(15: interpretation), Other(16: funding)

PRISMA (SR, 17 items)

Title(1), Abstract(2), Intro(3), Methods(4-11: protocol, eligibility, sources, strategy, selection, extraction, RoB, synthesis), Results(12-15: flow, characteristics, results, heterogeneity), Discussion(16), Other(17: registration)

CARE (Case Report, 13 items)

Title(1), Abstract(2), Intro(3), Patient(4-7: demographics, complaints, history, exam), Clinical(8-10: diagnosis, intervention, follow-up), Discussion(11-12: strengths/limits, rationale), Patient(13: consent)

判定

≥80% → 🟢 Good | 60-80% → 🟡 Needs attention | <60% → 🔴 Significant gaps

---

使用原則

1. 語意理解，非關鍵字匹配（「倫理委員會核准」= ethics approval）
2. Major = 可能被 reject，Minor = 改善建議
3. 給具體修復建議
4. 多檔案支持（Introduction、Methods 可能在不同檔案）