원클릭으로
mobile-ux-review
Use for mobile-first redesigns, tracker UX work, homepage/calculator/shops polish, Arabic/RTL mobile review.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use for mobile-first redesigns, tracker UX work, homepage/calculator/shops polish, Arabic/RTL mobile review.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Create custom subagents for specialized AI tasks. Use when you want to create a new type of subagent, set up task-specific agents, configure code reviewers, debuggers, or domain-specific assistants with custom prompts.
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use when encountering reproducible bugs; follow reproduction steps and remove instrumentation before finishing.
Convert 'Applied intelligently' Cursor rules (.cursor/rules/*.mdc) and slash commands (.cursor/commands/*.md) to Agent Skills format (.cursor/skills/). Use when you want to migrate rules or commands to skills, convert .mdc rules to SKILL.md format, or consolidate commands into the skills directory.
Adversarial multi-model code review — launch parallel readonly reviewers on different models, then synthesize consensus vs lone findings. Do not apply fixes unless the user asks.
Reproduce reported bugs before fixing. Provide evidence of reproduction and the fix; do not stop after repro to ask the user—continue to fix.
Guide users building apps, scripts, CI pipelines, or automations on top of the Cursor SDK - TypeScript (@cursor/sdk) or Python (cursor-sdk / cursor_sdk). Use when integrating Cursor agents programmatically; Agent.create, Agent.prompt, streaming, local vs cloud runtime, MCP, errors.
| name | mobile-ux-review |
| description | Use for mobile-first redesigns, tracker UX work, homepage/calculator/shops polish, Arabic/RTL mobile review. |
| when_to_use | ["A page feels cramped, slow, or unusable on a real phone","You're shipping a redesign and need a mobile-first audit","Arabic/RTL parity check across changed surfaces","Mobile keyboard / input / sticky-control regressions reported"] |
| related_files | ["styles/global.css","styles/pages/**","index.html, tracker.html, calculator.html, shops.html, methodology.html","src/components/nav.js, src/components/footer.js, src/components/ticker.js"] |
| related_prompts | [".github/prompts/mobile-ux-audit.prompt.md",".github/prompts/tracker-flagship-revamp.prompt.md",".github/prompts/accessibility-audit.prompt.md"] |
Use this to systematically improve mobile UX without breaking Arabic/RTL parity or accessibility.
docs/performance-baseline.json)npm run lint, npm run validate, npm test. Optionally npm run a11y.checklists/homepage.mdchecklists/tracker.mdchecklists/calculator.mdchecklists/shops.mdchecklists/rtl-mobile.mdinputmode on numeric inputs.# Mobile UX Review — <scope>
## Pages
- <page>: before / after screenshots at 360 / 390 / 430 / RTL-360
## Changes
- Token: <e.g. consolidated card padding into --space-card>
- Component: <e.g. nav drawer rebuilt with <details>>
- Page: <e.g. tracker hero rebalanced; karat strip scannable at 360px>
## Verification
- `npm run lint` PASS
- `npm test` PASS
- `npm run validate` PASS
- Lighthouse mobile: <before>/<after> for LCP, CLS, TBT
- RTL: verified at <viewports>
## Follow-ups
- <e.g. consider rebuilding calculator inputs as bottom-sheet on mobile>