prd-writer

name	prd-writer
description	Product Requirements Document writing - PRD templates, MoSCoW prioritization, user personas, competitive analysis, feature specs, acceptance criteria, risk assessment

PRD Writer

PRD Template

# Product Requirements Document

## Meta
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Product | [urun adi] |
| Author | [yazar] |
| Version | [v1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / In Review / Approved] |
| Last Updated | [tarih] |
| Stakeholders | [paydas listesi] |

---

## 1. Problem Statement

### The Problem
[Kullanicilarin yasadigi sorunu 2-3 cumle ile acikla]

### Who is Affected
[Etkilenen kullanici segmenti ve buyuklugu]

### Current Solutions
[Mevcut cozumler ve neden yetersiz oldugu]

### Evidence
- [Veri noktasi 1: kullanici arastirmasi, anket, metrik]
- [Veri noktasi 2]
- [Veri noktasi 3]

---

## 2. Goals & Success Metrics

### Goals
| Goal | Description | Metric | Target |
|------|-------------|--------|--------|
| G1 | [birincil hedef] | [olcum] | [hedef deger] |
| G2 | [ikincil hedef] | [olcum] | [hedef deger] |

### Non-Goals (Out of Scope)
- [Bu PRD kapsaminda OLMAYAN seyler]
- [Gelecek iterasyona birakilanlar]

### Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target | Measurement |
|--------|---------|--------|-------------|
| [KPI 1] | [mevcut] | [hedef] | [nasil olculecek] |
| [KPI 2] | [mevcut] | [hedef] | [nasil olculecek] |

---

## 3. User Personas

[Asagidaki Persona Template'i kullan]

---

## 4. User Stories

[Epic → Story → Acceptance Criteria hiyerarsisi]

---

## 5. Requirements

### Functional Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Priority | Notes |
|----|------------|----------|-------|
| FR-1 | [gereksinim] | Must | [detay] |
| FR-2 | [gereksinim] | Should | [detay] |

### Non-Functional Requirements

| ID | Category | Requirement | Target |
|----|----------|------------|--------|
| NFR-1 | Performance | Page load time | < 2s |
| NFR-2 | Scalability | Concurrent users | 10,000 |
| NFR-3 | Availability | Uptime SLA | 99.9% |
| NFR-4 | Security | Data encryption | AES-256 |

---

## 6. Design & UX

### User Flows
[Temel kullanici akislari - diyagram veya adim listesi]

### Wireframes
[Link veya embed]

### Edge Cases
| Scenario | Expected Behavior |
|----------|-------------------|
| [durum 1] | [beklenen davranis] |
| [durum 2] | [beklenen davranis] |

---

## 7. Technical Considerations

### Architecture
[Mimari yaklasim ve entegrasyonlar]

### Dependencies
| Dependency | Type | Risk | Mitigation |
|-----------|------|------|------------|
| [dep 1] | External API | Medium | Fallback mechanism |
| [dep 2] | Internal service | Low | Already available |

### Migration / Backward Compatibility
[Mevcut sistemle uyumluluk plani]

---

## 8. Timeline & Milestones

| Phase | Milestone | Duration | Target Date |
|-------|-----------|----------|-------------|
| Phase 1 | MVP | [sure] | [tarih] |
| Phase 2 | Beta | [sure] | [tarih] |
| Phase 3 | GA | [sure] | [tarih] |

---

## 9. Risks & Mitigations

[Asagidaki Risk Assessment framework'unu kullan]

---

## 10. Open Questions

| # | Question | Owner | Status |
|---|----------|-------|--------|
| 1 | [soru] | [kisi] | Open |
| 2 | [soru] | [kisi] | Resolved: [cevap] |

MoSCoW Prioritization

Framework

Category	Definition	Guideline
Must	Critical, non-negotiable	Launch blocker - no release without it
Should	Important but not critical	Expected by users, can workaround temporarily
Could	Nice to have	Enhances experience, not core
Won't	Out of scope (this iteration)	Documented for future consideration

Prioritization Matrix

## Feature Prioritization

| Feature | Impact (1-5) | Effort (1-5) | Risk (1-5) | Priority |
|---------|-------------|-------------|-----------|----------|
| [F1] | 5 | 2 | 1 | Must |
| [F2] | 4 | 3 | 2 | Should |
| [F3] | 3 | 4 | 3 | Could |
| [F4] | 2 | 5 | 4 | Won't |

### Scoring Rules
- Impact: Business/user value (5 = critical)
- Effort: Dev time and complexity (5 = very hard)
- Risk: Technical/business uncertainty (5 = very risky)
- Priority = High Impact + Low Effort + Low Risk = Must

User Persona Template

## Persona: [Isim]

**Photo:** [placeholder]
**Role:** [is unvani / kullanici tipi]
**Age:** [yas araligi]
**Tech Savvy:** [Low / Medium / High]

### Background
[2-3 cumle: kim, ne yapiyor, nerede calisiyor]

### Goals
1. [birincil hedef - isini kolaylastiran]
2. [ikincil hedef - uzun vadeli]
3. [ucuncul hedef - kisilsel]

### Pain Points
1. [en buyuk sorun - gunluk frustration]
2. [ikinci sorun]
3. [ucuncu sorun]

### Behaviors
- [nasil bilgi arar]
- [hangi araclari kullanir]
- [ne siklikta etkilesin]

### Motivations
- [ne motive eder]
- [ne icin para oder]

### Quote
> "[Persona'nin tipik bir sozu - empati kurmak icin]"

### Scenario
[Tipik bir gun: urunu ne zaman, nasil, neden kullanir]

Persona Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	Neden Yanlis	Dogru Yol
Too many personas (5+)	Odak kaybeder	2-3 primary persona
Vague demographics only	Actionable degil	Behavior + motivation ekle
No pain points	Cozum odakli olamaz	Gercek kullanici arastirmasindan cikar
Fictional without data	Yaniltici	Interview/survey veriyle destekle

Competitive Analysis Framework

## Competitive Analysis

### Market Landscape

| Competitor | Market Share | Target Segment | Pricing |
|-----------|-------------|---------------|---------|
| [rakip 1] | [%] | [segment] | [fiyat modeli] |
| [rakip 2] | [%] | [segment] | [fiyat modeli] |

### Feature Comparison Matrix

| Feature | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---------|-----|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| [F1] | [planned] | [var/yok] | [var/yok] | [var/yok] |
| [F2] | [planned] | [var/yok] | [var/yok] | [var/yok] |
| [F3] | [planned] | [var/yok] | [var/yok] | [var/yok] |

### Differentiators
1. [Bizi farkli kilan 1]
2. [Bizi farkli kilan 2]
3. [Bizi farkli kilan 3]

### Competitive Moat
[Neden kopyalanamaz / zorlasilir]

### Gaps & Opportunities
- [Rakiplerin zayif noktasi 1]
- [Rakiplerin zayif noktasi 2]

Feature Specification Format

## Feature: [Ozellik Adi]

**ID:** FEAT-001
**Priority:** Must / Should / Could
**Epic:** [bagli epic]
**Owner:** [sorumluluk]

### Description
[1-2 paragraf: ne yapiyor, neden onemli]

### User Stories
- As a [role], I want [feature], so that [benefit]

### Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Given [precondition], when [action], then [result]
- [ ] Given [precondition], when [action], then [result]

### UI/UX
[Wireframe link veya description]

### Edge Cases
| Case | Behavior |
|------|----------|
| [durum] | [davranis] |

### Technical Notes
[API endpoint, data model, entegrasyon notlari]

### Dependencies
- [Bagimlilik 1]
- [Bagimlilik 2]

### Out of Scope
- [Bu iterasyonda yapilmayacak]

Acceptance Criteria Yazimi

Given-When-Then (BDD) Format

Feature: User Registration

  Scenario: Successful registration with valid data
    Given the user is on the registration page
    And the user has not previously registered
    When the user enters valid email "[e-mail]"
    And the user enters a password meeting complexity requirements
    And the user clicks "Register"
    Then a new account should be created
    And a verification email should be sent
    And the user should see a success message

  Scenario: Registration with existing email
    Given the user is on the registration page
    And an account with "[e-mail]" already exists
    When the user enters email "[e-mail]"
    And the user clicks "Register"
    Then the user should see "Email already in use" error
    And no duplicate account should be created

Acceptance Criteria Checklist

• Happy path covered
• Error states defined
• Edge cases documented
• Performance requirements specified
• Security requirements included
• Accessibility requirements noted
• Testable (can be verified objectively)

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	Neden Yanlis	Dogru Yol
"System should be fast"	Olculemez	"Page loads in < 2 seconds"
"Should work correctly"	Belirsiz	Specific expected behavior
No error scenarios	Incomplete	Define every failure mode
Implementation details	Cozumu kisitlar	Focus on behavior, not how

Risk Assessment

Risk Matrix

## Risk Register

| ID | Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score | Mitigation | Owner |
|----|------|-------------------|--------------|-------|------------|-------|
| R1 | [risk] | [L] | [I] | [LxI] | [plan] | [kisi] |
| R2 | [risk] | [L] | [I] | [LxI] | [plan] | [kisi] |

### Risk Categories
- **Technical:** Architecture, integration, performance
- **Resource:** Staffing, skills, availability
- **Schedule:** Dependencies, estimation accuracy
- **Business:** Market changes, stakeholder alignment
- **External:** Third-party, regulatory, competitive

### Risk Response Strategies
- **Avoid:** Change plan to eliminate risk
- **Mitigate:** Reduce likelihood or impact
- **Transfer:** Insurance, outsource, vendor SLA
- **Accept:** Monitor and contingency plan

Timeline & Milestone Planning

Phase Planning Template

## Implementation Phases

### Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)
- [ ] Data model design
- [ ] API scaffolding
- [ ] Auth integration
**Deliverable:** Backend API functional
**Exit Criteria:** API tests passing, deployed to staging

### Phase 2: Core Features (Week 3-5)
- [ ] Feature A implementation
- [ ] Feature B implementation
- [ ] Integration testing
**Deliverable:** Core functionality complete
**Exit Criteria:** All Must requirements met, QA passed

### Phase 3: Polish (Week 6-7)
- [ ] UI/UX refinement
- [ ] Performance optimization
- [ ] Should requirements
**Deliverable:** Beta-ready product
**Exit Criteria:** Beta user feedback positive

### Phase 4: Launch (Week 8)
- [ ] Production deployment
- [ ] Monitoring setup
- [ ] Documentation
**Deliverable:** GA release
**Exit Criteria:** All launch criteria met

PRD Review Checklist

• Problem statement is clear and evidence-based
• Success metrics are measurable and time-bound
• User personas based on real research
• Requirements use MoSCoW prioritization
• Acceptance criteria are testable
• Risks identified with mitigation plans
• Timeline is realistic with buffer
• Open questions have owners and deadlines
• All stakeholders have reviewed and agreed
• Non-goals explicitly stated