메뉴
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use khi user nói 'làm khóa luận', 'thesis V1', 'audit thesis', 'thesis ready to defense?', 'render thesis docx', hoặc trước khi ship academic deliverable. Workflow: planning → draft chapters → 3-agent outside-in audit → fix → assemble DOCX. Backed by thesis-content-standard.md rubric /100.
Dùng khi user nói 'extract citations', 'trích dẫn luận văn', 'audit thesis cite', 'verify bibliography', 'orphan citation check', 'kiểm tra cite luận văn', hoặc khi review thesis chapter trước defense. Parse `[N]` cite keys từ thesis chapters + verify chéo với `documents/<thesis-dir>/references/bibliography.md` → báo 3 bucket: matched / orphan-body (cite không có entry) / orphan-bib (entry không cite).
Dùng khi user nói 'figure curation', 'thesis figures', 'caption', 'đánh số hình', 'INDEX figure', 'curate figure cho Chapter N', 'add figure to thesis', 'kiểm tra caption hình', 'audit figure thesis'. Codifies selection criteria (figure vs table vs prose), per-chapter numbering N.M, Vietnamese caption format, per-chapter INDEX generation. Pair với thesis-docx pipeline.
Use when user says 'review UI', 'check design', 'audit screenshots', or after any UI/UX code change. Auto-runs after every frontend PR. Captures before/after screenshots, scores per-screen on /128 scale.
Dùng khi user nói 'extract citations', 'trích dẫn luận văn', 'audit thesis cite', 'verify bibliography', 'orphan citation check', 'kiểm tra cite luận văn', hoặc khi review thesis chapter trước defense. Parse `[N]` cite keys từ thesis chapters + verify chéo với `documents/<thesis-dir>/references/bibliography.md` → báo 3 bucket: matched / orphan-body (cite không có entry) / orphan-bib (entry không cite).
Dùng khi user nói 'figure curation', 'thesis figures', 'caption', 'đánh số hình', 'INDEX figure', 'curate figure cho Chapter N', 'add figure to thesis', 'kiểm tra caption hình', 'audit figure thesis'. Codifies selection criteria (figure vs table vs prose), per-chapter numbering N.M, Vietnamese caption format, per-chapter INDEX generation. Pair với thesis-docx pipeline.
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements |
Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:
Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at code-reviewer.md
Placeholders:
{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
Subagent-Driven Development:
Executing Plans:
Ad-Hoc Development:
Never:
If reviewer wrong:
See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md