qa-process
[QA Method] ISTQB test process lifecycle: Plan, Analyze, Design, Implement, Execute, Report, Close with entry/exit criteria.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
[QA Method] ISTQB test process lifecycle: Plan, Analyze, Design, Implement, Execute, Report, Close with entry/exit criteria.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | qa-process |
| description | [QA Method] ISTQB test process lifecycle: Plan, Analyze, Design, Implement, Execute, Report, Close with entry/exit criteria. |
| argument-hint | [phase name | analyze VCST-XXXX | close sprint-XX | gates] |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Navigate and apply the ISTQB Foundation-level test process: 7 phases with formal entry/exit criteria, phase-to-skill mapping, and VC-specific lifecycle adaptations. Use as the master reference for how all QA methodology skills, commands, and agents connect into a coherent testing workflow.
/qa-process # Full lifecycle overview + phase-to-skill navigation map
/qa-process analyze VCST-1234 # Derive test conditions from a JIRA ticket
/qa-process implement # Pre-execution readiness checklist (12 items)
/qa-process close sprint-42 # Sprint close checklist + retrospective template
/qa-process gates # Show all 7 phase entry/exit criteria
/qa-process plan # Phase 1 guidance — scope, approach, risk, schedule
Read the lifecycle reference: Load test-process-lifecycle.md from this skill folder for the full 7-phase process, entry/exit criteria, and VC adaptations.
Determine context:
plan, analyze, design, implement, execute, report, close) → show that phase's details + entry/exit criteriaanalyze VCST-XXXX → fetch ticket via Atlassian MCP, derive numbered test conditions from ACsimplement → run the 12-item pre-execution readiness checklist, flag blockersclose sprint-XX → run the 15-item close checklist, generate retrospective from latest run datagates → show the phase transition gate table (7 transitions with criteria)For Analyze phase:
/qa-test-design for formal test case derivationFor Implement phase:
/qa-env-check for environment validationFor Close phase:
For lifecycle variant selection:
| Phase | Primary Skill / Command |
|---|---|
| Plan | /qa-plan, /qa-risk |
| Analyze | This skill (deep section) → feeds /qa-test-design |
| Design | /qa-test-design, /qa-sbtm (charters) |
| Implement | /qa-env-check |
| Execute | /qa-test, /qa-smoke, /qa-regression, /qa-investigate, /qa-evidence |
| Report | /qa-metrics (gates + catalog) |
| Close | This skill (deep section) → feeds back into Plan |
Initialize / onboard this agentic-QA plugin onto a deployment. Installs deps, then asks the operator only what genuinely shapes the config — the environment NAME, the bug tracker (Jira / Azure Boards), the code host (GitHub / Azure Repos), and an auth preference per axis (PAT recommended, else browser/CLI login). Everything else — whether it is a native-platform or a CLIENT project, the client org, the contribution mode, the fork account — is DERIVED from the token + the filled env + a live module/repo scan. Writes project-profile.json + .env.<env> + .env.local + .mcp.json and verifies access. The whole point is to make /qa-fix route each bug to the RIGHT repo (client custom code vs native platform) and file to the RIGHT tracker. Use when standing the plugin up on a new machine or for a new customer.
Initialize / onboard this agentic-QA plugin onto a deployment. Installs deps, then asks the operator only what genuinely shapes the config — the environment NAME, the bug tracker (Jira / Azure Boards), the code host (GitHub / Azure Repos), and an auth preference per axis (PAT recommended, else browser/CLI login). Everything else — whether it is a native-platform or a CLIENT project, the client org, the contribution mode, the fork account — is DERIVED from the token + the filled env + a live module/repo scan. Writes project-profile.json + .env.<env> + .env.local + .mcp.json and verifies access. The whole point is to make /qa-fix route each bug to the RIGHT repo (client custom code vs native platform) and file to the RIGHT tracker. Use when standing the plugin up on a new machine or for a new customer.
[QA Methodology] Gather ALL fresh CI prerelease artifacts for a change (modules + platform + vc-frontend) and deploy them together to the test env (vc-deploy-dev@<TEST_ENV branch>) in ONE manifest update: resolve a tracker ticket's linked PRs across all repos (or an explicit --module/--platform/--theme/--pr set) → each PR's latest vc3prerelease build → minimal-diff repin of backend/packages.json (AzureBlob/BlobName + PlatformVersion) and theme/artifact.json → dry-run combined diff (default) or a gated deploy PR (direct same-repo when the account has write, else a fork PR) → --verify polls the env-branch pin + /api/platform/modules per target. Never merges (a human merges to deploy); writes route through gh's keyring token; prints the web-edit URL when it can't push. Unblocks /qa-test PR#N and /qa-verify-fix.
[QA Method] Triangulate each BL invariant against docs + live + source code, auto-apply confirmed changes to business-logic.md, and reconcile test-case coverage. Delegates the live axis to qa-testing-expert; runs the triangulation via ba-system-analyzer.
Bring up a local Virto Commerce stack (backend + storefront + DB + ES) via start-local, pinned to the ACTUAL deployed package manifest (vc-deploy-dev @ vcptcore-demo); optionally augment it with the module/PR versions a JIRA task needs. Use when asked to spin up / run / provision a local VC environment, reproduce a deployed env locally, or stand up an env to test a specific ticket.
[QA Method] Defect management lifecycle: JIRA Bug Workflow, triage, classification, report validation, verification protocol, defect metrics.