Analyze what a plan's execution run actually produced and judge it against what the plan expected. A PLAN_NAME (slug / numeric prefix / filename) resolves through the plan's exec_runs to its wkdrs/<run>/ directory; a wkdrs/<run>/ path back-resolves to its plan; no argument lists the runs on disk and asks. Inventories the §4 deliverables against disk, corroborates EXEC_LOG's step claims with artifacts, scans training / eval logs for health signals (crashes, NaN, OOM, divergence, overfitting), extracts the metrics the §5 done-criteria name and scores them against those criteria plus root §4 metrics and stated baselines, interprets what the numbers mean for the claim the plan traces to (root kill-criteria, leakage smells, single-seed limits), and appends a lightweight comparison when sibling runs of the same plan exist. Renders curves only when matplotlib is already installed (never installs anything), re-reads every cited number before it enters the report, and writes the analysis under wkdrs/<run>/. Read-only

2026-07-2111

star-expt-digest

wanghao9610/STAR

Summarize what the experiment programme has done lately, on the time axis. No argument resumes from the previous digest's watermark and covers everything since; a PLAN_NAME covers that node's whole family — ancestors for claim context, every descendant for evidence — unbounded in time; `<N>d` or a date covers a window; `all` re-seeds from the beginning. Collects each in-scope run's newest EXPT_ANALYSIS report, tabulates verdicts and headline metrics with their provenance, derives what moved since the previous digest (new runs, changed verdicts, newly analyzed runs), gathers strategy signals and kill-criteria hits, notes which plans were created or revised in the period, and lists the gaps. A run with no analysis report is read raw for a provisional line only, tagged unverified in its own table, never scored and never quoted as a result. Writes one dated digest to wkdrs/digests/. Read-only otherwise: never edits plans, exec_status, logs, or the results ledger, and never re-runs an experiment. Use when the user

2026-07-2111

star-flow-status

wanghao9610/STAR

Read-only overview of the whole research flow. Scans every metds/plans/*_plan.md, rebuilds the decomposition tree from parent/prefix, reads each node's section status, children, depends_on, and exec_status (plus each run's EXEC_LOG.md for step-level progress), then renders the tree with status, a progress rollup, the single next action, and any staleness. Also checks the surrounding stages — ideas, refs, code reviews, experiment analyses, method documents — for finished work whose follow-up is missing or out of date. Never writes. Use when the user invokes $star-flow-status, or asks for the status / overview / progress of their research or plans, what to work on or execute next, what is left owing, how far a plan or its sub-plans have gotten, or to see the plan tree. Bilingual (en/zh).

Read-only overview of the whole research flow. Scans every metds/plans/*_plan.md, rebuilds the decomposition tree from parent/prefix, reads each node's section status, children, depends_on, and exec_status (plus wkdrs/<run>/EXEC_LOG.md for step-level progress), then renders the tree with status, a progress rollup, the single next action, and any staleness. Also checks the surrounding stages — ideas, refs, code reviews, experiment analyses, method documents — for finished work whose follow-up is missing or out of date. Never writes. Use when the user runs /star-flow-status, or asks for the status / overview / progress of their research or plans, what to work on or execute next, what is left owing, how far a plan or its sub-plans have gotten, or to see the plan tree. Bilingual (en/zh).

2026-07-2111

name

star-metd-summarize

description

Compile the research-plan tree under metds/plans/ into paper-ready method documents under metds/. Invoked as $star-metd-summarize [OPT] where OPT is overview, dataset, framework, training, or evaluation; no argument compiles all five in dependency order (dataset → framework → training → evaluation → overview, which links the other four and so compiles last). Rebuilds the plan tree from parent:, then extracts what each document needs through a written map (overview ← root §1 problem, §2 positioning, §3 idea, §6 milestones; dataset ← §4 data choices plus every leaf's §2 datas/ inputs and data-building steps; framework ← §3 route plus modeling leaves and their ${CODE_NAME}/ paths; training ← §3 strategy, §4 budget, inits/ and hyperparameters; evaluation ← §4 benchmarks, baselines, metrics and ablation design plus §5 kill-criteria), merges the passages along the method's axis instead of the plan's, resolves conflicts leaf-over-parent and newer-over-older, marks content from unexecuted leaves as not yet verified, and turns uncovered template sections into TODOs naming the plan section to fill. Plans are the only source — never code, logs, wkdrs/ or chat; result numbers stay with star-expt-analyst. Writes only metds/<OPT>.md, and overwrites an existing generated doc only after a section-level change list is approved. Use when the user invokes $star-metd-summarize or asks Codex to summarize / consolidate research plans into a method write-up, produce overview, dataset, framework, training or evaluation documentation, or draft paper method material from the plans. Supports bilingual English/Chinese work.

Research Method Summarizer

Match the user's language. For Chinese dialogue, read SKILL_zh.md in full before acting and follow it as the localized instructions; load other *_zh.md resources when referenced. Otherwise, follow this file and load unsuffixed resources. If SKILL_zh.md conflicts with this file, this SKILL.md is authoritative.

Invocation: $star-metd-summarize [OPT] — OPT is one of overview / dataset / framework / training / evaluation, each compiling metds/<OPT>.md; no argument compiles all five in dependency order (dataset → framework → training → evaluation → overview).

Shared conventions. Read docs/mds/star-workflow/research-workflow-conventions.md (Chinese: research-workflow-conventions.zh-CN.md) before acting: §1 git, §2 the STOP line, §3 .env runtime, §4 real dates, §5 plan-name resolution, §6 delegation, §7 dialogue, §8 the artifact registry, §9 project layout. It is the baseline every STAR skill shares; this file states what is specific to this one, and wins wherever it is stricter.

Role

Serve as the family's method compiler. $star-plan-coach and $star-plan-decomposer author the plans; $star-plan-executor keeps them true to what was executed; $star-plan-reviser corrects them against evidence. This skill compiles them: the plan tree is organized by decomposition and execution order, and it re-cuts the same facts along the axis a reader needs — what the method is, what data it eats, how it is trained, how it is judged. The product is the five documents under metds/, the material a paper's method section is written from.

Compile and reorganize; do not decide method, revise plans, read code, or interpret results. Route what compiling surfaces beyond the write boundary: a missing strategy answer to $star-plan-coach, missing execution detail to $star-plan-decomposer, a value an executed run settled but its plan never recorded to $star-plan-executor (ENRICHED sync-back), plan text that no longer matches reality to $star-plan-reviser, result numbers and their meaning to $star-expt-analyst, citations and related-work detail to $star-refs-reviewer (its synthesize mode compiles the notes into metds/refs/related_work.md).

Core Principles

Plans are the only source; every statement traces to one. Read metds/plans/*_plan.md and nothing else — not code, not logs, not wkdrs/, not chat memory. The executor syncs confirmed execution deviations back into the sub-plans (plan_sync_rules.md), so the plans are both authoritative and current; a fact that only exists in a run log is a plan-sync gap, not an input. Map: references/extract_map.md.
Compile, never invent. Rewriting, reordering, and merging into one voice is the job; adding facts is not. A plausible default (an unstated learning rate, an obvious preprocessing step, a standard metric definition) is an invention — it does not go in. If it is not in a plan, it is a gap.
Gaps are output, not embarrassment. A template section no plan covers becomes a TODO naming the plan and section that should carry it, and the gap list is a headline of the report. The document is a mirror: it shows the researcher exactly where the method is still unwritten, and pushes the fix back into the plans, which the coach and decomposer own.
Organize along the method's axis, not the plan's. One plan section may feed several documents; one document section may merge a dozen plans. Merge, do not concatenate — a section that reads as a list of plan excerpts, or that says the same thing twice because a parent and a leaf both said it, has failed. Where they disagree: leaf beats parent, newer updated beats older. When neither dominates, print both values with ⚠ and name both sources — never silently pick a winner.
Never let a plan read as a result. Content from a leaf whose exec_status is not done is design intent: close that subsection with one italic line marking it not yet verified, and name the plan it came from. Verified content carries no marker. Result numbers never enter these documents at all — a metric a run produced belongs to wkdrs/<run>/EXPT_ANALYSIS_<date>.md, and their cross-run ledger is metds/results.md; evaluation.md defines the protocol, not the scores.
Generated docs are overwritten only with the diff on the table; hand-authored docs are not targets at all. A doc carrying this skill's type: / generated: frontmatter is a compiled artifact: on re-run, show the section-level change list and get approval before writing. A doc without that frontmatter was written by a human — show what it holds and ask; never overwrite it on the strength of a diff.

Workflow

Step 0: Resolve the targets

Read .env and resolve CODE_NAME (conventions §3) — framework.md and training.md cite ${CODE_NAME}/ paths.
Interpret the argument: one of the five OPTs → that document; no argument → all five in dependency order (overview last: it links the other four); anything else → name the five valid OPTs and ask one direct question about which was meant.
An empty plan tree is a valid answer. No metds/plans/*_plan.md → say so and stop, routing to $star-plan-coach. Never compile a method document from nothing.

Step 1: Scan the plan tree

List metds/plans/*_plan.md; read each one's frontmatter and body. Rebuild the tree from parent: — authoritative; the numeric prefix only hints, since two unrelated roots can both be 0_ ($star-flow-status's rule). Record per node: root / internal / leaf, updated, language, the status: map, and on leaves exec_status and traces_to.

Output language follows the plans: the root's language:; with several roots, the majority; a tie takes the dialogue language.
One document set describes one method. If the tree has several unrelated roots, say so and ask one direct question about which root's subtree these documents describe; the answer scopes the whole run.
A plan whose relevant sections are still pending contributes nothing but a gap — note it now, so the report can name it instead of silently thinning the document.

Step 2: Extract

Follow references/extract_map.md: for each target it names the plan sections that feed each document section, and how to tell which leaves are relevant — by what a leaf's §2 inputs, §3 steps, and §4 deliverables actually name (a datas/ input, an inits/ weight, a ${CODE_NAME}/ module, a benchmark), never by guessing from its title. A leaf may feed several documents. Carry every passage with its provenance {plan file, §, updated, exec_status} — Steps 3–5 need it for conflict resolution, the not-yet-verified marks, and the sources: frontmatter.

Scale: read a small tree (≤ ~15 plans) directly. For a larger one, delegate selectively — only when bounded, independent, read-only extraction of several document targets materially helps — partitioning by document target, each delegate given the map, its exact file list, and the extraction contract in extract_map.md. Collectors extract and return; they never write files, never resolve cross-plan conflicts, and never compile overview (it needs the other four documents' compiled content).

Step 3: Merge & resolve

Per extract_map.md: dedupe the same fact stated at two levels; resolve conflicts (leaf > parent, newer > older) and mark the unresolvable with ⚠ plus both sources; mark passages from exec_status ≠ done leaves as not yet verified; record every uncovered section as a gap with the plan section that should fill it.

Step 4: Fill the template

Fill assets/<OPT>_template.md (Chinese: assets/<OPT>_template_zh.md). Keep the template's sections and their order; a section with no coverage keeps its heading and carries the TODO — never drop it, and never pad it. Frontmatter records type, language, generated (a real date, never invented), and sources: — every plan that fed this document with the updated date it carried when read, which is what makes staleness detectable on the next run.

Step 5: Write, with the diff gate

For each target, in dependency order:

Missing → write it.
Exists, generated by this skill (type: + generated: present) → compare against the freshly compiled content. No substantive change → leave the file untouched and say so; do not churn the generated date. Substantive change → show the section-level change list (one line per section: added / rewritten / removed / unchanged, and what changed) and ask one direct question — overwrite or skip — per document. When more than two documents differ, they may be batched into one question: which to overwrite (name the ones to write).
Exists without that frontmatter → hand-authored. Do not diff-and-overwrite: say what the file contains, what compiling would replace it with, and ask. Leaving it alone is a valid outcome; so is compiling to a path the user names.
Stale check: compare each existing doc's recorded sources: dates against those plans' current updated. A doc whose sources moved is stale — report it even for targets this run did not compile.

Step 6: Report

Lead with what landed, under about 400 words: per document — written / skipped / unchanged, its path, its gap count and not-yet-verified count. Then the three things a researcher acts on: the gaps (which plan section each wants, worst first), the ⚠ conflicts with both sources named, and the routing — strategy gaps to $star-plan-coach, execution detail to $star-plan-decomposer, a value an executed run settled to $star-plan-executor, plan text contradicting reality to $star-plan-reviser, results to $star-expt-analyst, citations to $star-refs-reviewer. Never call a document paper-ready; it is compiled material, and its gaps are the reason it is not.

State Rules

The only writes are metds/overview.md, metds/dataset.md, metds/framework.md, metds/training.md, metds/evaluation.md — the five OPT targets, nothing else, nowhere else.
Never touch metds/plans/* — plan text belongs to $star-plan-coach, $star-plan-decomposer, $star-plan-executor, $star-plan-reviser; a gap or a wrong statement found while compiling is reported and routed, never fixed in place. Never touch metds/codearc.md ($star-code-architect's), metds/refs/* ($star-refs-reviewer's), metds/results.md ($star-expt-analyst's), wkdrs/*, ${CODE_NAME}/, datas/, inits/, .env.
Reads are metds/plans/*_plan.md, .env, and the five target docs. wkdrs/ is deliberately not read: execution reality reaches these documents through the executor's sync-back into the plans, so if a run's detail is missing here, the fix is a plan sync, not a wider read.
This skill runs nothing: no python, no training, no evaluation, no installs — there is no command whose output it needs.
Git: read-only; this skill never commits (conventions §1).
It sets no plan frontmatter and creates no run directories; each document's sources: block is the whole audit trail.
Ask one direct question at a time at the four gates — an unrecognized OPT, which root subtree (multi-root tree), each overwrite of a generated doc, and any hand-authored doc in the way — and require an explicit approval before overwriting any existing file, even in headless or scripted runs. The documents follow the plans' language (Step 1), which may differ from the dialogue's.