| name | evidence-auditor |
| description | Use when `paper-review` needs a claim-by-claim evidence gap report grounded in an extracted claim ledger.
**Trigger**: evidence audit, missing evidence, unsupported claims, 审稿证据审计, 证据缺口.
**Use when**: `paper-review` 流程中,需要逐条检查 claim 的证据链、缺 baseline、评测薄弱点。
**Skip if**: 缺少 claims 输入(例如还没有 `output/CLAIMS.md`)。
**Network**: none.
**Guardrail**: 只写“缺口/风险/下一步验证”,不要替作者补写论述或引入新主张。
|
Evidence Auditor
Transforms a claim ledger into a gap report for paper-review.
Input
Output
output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md
output/EVIDENCE_AUDIT.jsonl (review-evidence-gap.v1)
Contract
Each gap block should include:
- claim reference
- what evidence is already present
- what is missing or weak
- minimal fix
- severity
Each JSONL record must retain claim_id and a stable gap_id so the final
review can cite the exact failure rather than paraphrasing an unlocated concern.
Script boundary
scripts/run.py should:
- iterate existing claims only
- classify the likely evidence risk
- write actionable, bounded gap items
It should not invent new claims or rewrite the manuscript.
Acceptance
- every claim has a corresponding evidence note or gap item
- minimal fixes are actionable and concrete
- structured records join back to every
claim_id
Non-goals
- manuscript rewriting
- novelty assessment
- recommendation writing