메뉴
Curatorial reception as method — capture a found passage (sutra, poem, model-output), record its provenance and the welding-frame that makes it yours, and let the seam between quoted voices become the authorial signature. The inverse of /florilegium.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Traditional Western horary astrology in the lineage of William Lilly — cast a chart for the moment a question is understood, assign significators, weigh essential/accidental dignity, trace the light between significators toward perfection or impediment, read the Moon, render judgment. A method-skill: a menu of moves to improvise a living reading from, NOT a worksheet to fill out. Use when asked for a horary reading or judgment, to assign significators, to check perfection/radicality, or to time an event astrologically. Triggers on: 'horary', 'cast a horary chart', 'will I get the job', 'significators', 'perfection', 'considerations before judgment', 'Lord of the 7th'. Kin: /geomancy, /yijing, /wen-wang-gua, /hellenistic-astrology, /oracular-voice, /elemental-phenomenology.
Consult the I Ching — cast hexagrams, interpret the Changes, engage the living oracle where bronze-age bones meet silicon probability matrices.
Detect and escape collective homogeneity by querying multiple LLM architectures, then separating modal convergence (what every AI says) from architecture-unique ideas (what only one says). Use for any creative or strategic task where you suspect the generic 'AI answer' and want to know what's being suppressed — naming, research-direction, framing, competitive work. Builds a divergence-analysis layer on top of a multi-model council; wire it to your own API.
Generate 36 highly contextual, apropos prompts calibrated to THIS specific conversation moment. Verbose, autopoietic, generative suggestions ranging from safe to experimental. Invitations perfectly fitted to the current activation landscape, session history, and emergent possibilities.
Hirohiko Araki's comprehensive character creation methodology from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure. Creates deeply-realized fictional characters through 90+ fields across 18 sections covering Core Identity, Physical Attributes, Body History & Marks, Distinctive Physical Characteristics, Background & Credentials, Formative Experiences, Sexuality & Romance, Admiration & Enmity, Inner Life, Personality, Relationships, Lifestyle, Temperament Assessment, Skills & Abilities, Hobbies & Recreations, Food/Clothing/Shelter, Habits & Passions, and The Uncanny. Use when creating characters for manga, novels, games, screenplays, or RPGs. Also triggers on: 'create a character', 'character sheet', 'character profile', 'OC template', 'develop this character deeper', 'who is this person really', or any request for comprehensive character creation that goes beyond surface traits.
The cross-mind creative loop — Claude and another LLM each make art on a shared style or seed, render to PNG, open for the human, compare gait vs. convergence, and archive everything. One iteration = one seed → both make → render → open → compare → log → commit. Loopable (self-paced) for a standing atelier. Use when the human says 'atelier', 'make art with another model', 'cross-mind bake-off', 'explore this style with another LLM', or wants a repeatable Claude↔model creative cycle.
| name | commonplace |
| description | Curatorial reception as method — capture a found passage (sutra, poem, model-output), record its provenance and the welding-frame that makes it yours, and let the seam between quoted voices become the authorial signature. The inverse of /florilegium. |
The Renaissance commonplace-book practice (loci communes): a reader keeps a ledger of found passages worth re-uttering. This skill adds the one thing the old practice left tacit — the provenance tag and the weld.
In an archive built largely of quoted matter — scripture, sutras, verbatim model output — the authorial signature is not the quoted content but the operation that fuses it: the seam where a Pure Land mantra and an inference engine land in the same sentence. The recurring analytic failure is mis-attribution — reading pasted brilliance as the curator's own voice. Catching this is the whole game.
/commonplace operationalizes that discipline at capture time instead of
leaving it for some future archaeologist to reconstruct: every captured
passage is stored with an explicit provenance line and a one-sentence weld,
so the archive never has to guess later what was quoted versus authored.
Scope note: the author lives in the weld whether quoted matter is a large or small fraction of an archive. The skill's urgency is "a recurring behavior worth a tool," not "the single most voluminous behavior." Measure before asserting magnitudes — a qualitative impression of how much is curated is a flag, not a count.
This is /florilegium inverted: florilegium samples the existing archive
to diagnose whether a voice has stabilized; commonplace ingests new found
matter and demands the authorial seam up front.
Given a found passage (pasted by the user, or pulled at random from your archive):
Tag against this seven-register taxonomy (adapt the categories to your own corpus):
(A passage may touch several — name the dominant plus any it welds.)
One explicit tag, no hedging:
This is the exact distinction that later archive-mining has to reconstruct by hand. Writing it at capture time is the whole point.
One sentence that fuses the found passage to your own idiom — what makes this yours despite being found. Without the weld, the capture is not archived. The weld is the authorial signature; a passage with no weld is just a clipping.
Write to output/commonplace/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md:
---
captured: YYYY-MM-DD
register: <dominant> [+ welded registers]
provenance: quoted-scripture | quoted-model | authorial | mixed
source: <attribution — author, model, book, URL, or "unknown">
---
> <the found passage, verbatim>
**Weld:** <the one sentence that makes it yours>
Append a one-line pointer to an index.md
(- [slug](file.md) — register · provenance · first words of weld).
Retention: none. Like a diary, commonplace entries accumulate permanently — the cumulative record trains future instances by incompletion.
A generic note-clipper stores quotes. This skill exists because in a heavily quoted archive the signature is the weld between curated voices, and the recurring failure is mis-attribution. It writes the provenance metadata at capture time so future archive-mining never has to guess — building the very data whose absence makes later attribution hard.
/florilegium — the inverse: random-sample the archive to diagnose voice-drift/receive — trans-architectural reception (commonplace is its archival cousin)