aico-backend-implement

name

aico-backend-implement

description

Execute backend task implementation with TDD. Read task file, execute steps, verify each, update status. Use this skill when: - User asks to "implement task/plan", "start implementation", "execute plan", or "start coding" - Have task file (story-* or standalone-*) ready to execute - User asks to "use TDD", "write test first", or "test-driven" - User asks to "write tests", "add tests", "create tests" - Fixing bugs (write failing test first) TDD Iron Law: NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST TDD Cycle: RED (failing test) → Verify fails → GREEN (minimal code) → Verify passes → REFACTOR Prerequisites: - Task file in docs/reference/backend/tasks/ (story-* or standalone-*) - Read constraints.md and design spec before coding Flow: Read Task → Read Constraints → Execute Steps → Verify → Test → Update Status

Implement

Language Configuration

Before generating any content, check aico.json in project root for language field to determine the output language. If not set, default to English.

Process

0. Read task file (MANDATORY):

   • Look for task file in docs/reference/backend/tasks/
   • Accept either:
     • Story-based: story-{story-name}.md with task number
     • Standalone: standalone-{task-name}.md with task number
   • User must specify task number (e.g., "implement story-user-api Task 1" or "implement standalone-fix-auth Task 1")
   • Both formats contain multiple tasks, just different naming
   • If NOT exists or task number not specified → STOP and ask user which task to implement

1. Read constraints FIRST (before any code):

   • docs/reference/backend/constraints.md - Tech stack, patterns

2. Execute implementation steps:

   • Read "Implementation Steps" section from task
   • Execute each step in order
   • Run verification command after each step
   • If fail → fix before proceeding
   • If pass → continue to next step

3. After all steps:

   • Run unit tests
   • Run build check

4. Update task status:

   • Update the specific task section in the file
   • Mark acceptance criteria checkboxes: - [ ] → - [x]
   • Change Status from pending to completed
   • Update "Progress" section at bottom of file
   • Both story-based and standalone files use the same format

5. Notify completion:

   • Show task file path and task number
   • Show completion status
   • Check related Story (story-based only):
     • Read > **Story**: field from file header
     • If Story exists, check story file at docs/reference/pm/stories/
     • Update Story's Related Tasks section: mark this task as - [x]
     • Count total vs completed tasks
     • If all tasks completed, show: "✅ All tasks completed! Story {story-name} is ready for acceptance."
     • If partial completion, show: "⏳ Progress: X/Y tasks completed"

Task File Format

See Task File Template for complete structure.

Both story-based and standalone tasks use the same file structure - the only difference is the filename:

• Story-based: story-{story-name}.md (from PM story breakdown)
• Standalone: standalone-{task-name}.md (from plan/ad-hoc requirements)

Usage Examples:

• implement story-user-api Task 1
• implement standalone-fix-auth Task 1

Execution Flow

Read Task File
     ↓
Read Constraints (constraints.md)
     ↓
Execute Step 1 → Verify → Pass? → Continue
                      ↓
                     Fail → Fix → Retry
     ↓
Execute Step 2 → Verify → Pass? → Continue
     ↓
     ...
     ↓
Run Unit Tests
     ↓
Run Build Check
     ↓
Update Task File (mark AC completed, update status)
     ↓
Show Completion Summary

Step Execution Rules

Rule 1: Follow Constraints Exactly

// ❌ Wrong: Ignore error handling pattern
const user = await db.users.findOne({ id });

// ✅ Right: Follow established patterns from constraints
const user = await userRepository.findById(id);
if (!user) throw new NotFoundError('User not found');

Rule 2: Verify Before Proceeding

Each step has a Verify section - MUST run it and confirm expected output before moving on.

Rule 3: No Skipping

• Execute ALL steps in order
• Do NOT combine steps
• Do NOT skip verification

Post-Implementation Checklist

1. Run tests: npm test [component]
2. Run build: npm run build
3. Update task file:
   • Mark AC checkboxes: - [x]
   • Update Status: completed
4. Show completion summary to user

Error Handling

Error Type	Action
TypeScript error	Fix type issues, re-verify
Test failure	Debug test, fix implementation or test
Build failure	Check imports, fix errors
Constraint violation	Re-read constraints, align code

Updating Task File

After successful implementation, update the task file. Both story-based and standalone files use the same format, so the update process is identical:

1. Mark Task's Acceptance Criteria as Completed

## Task 1: Define Types

> **Status**: completed ← Changed from pending

### Acceptance Criteria

- [x] Types defined correctly ← Changed from [ ]
- [x] Exported from index ← Changed from [ ]
- [x] No type errors ← Changed from [ ]

2. Update Progress Section

## Progress

- Total tasks: 6
- Completed: 1 ← Changed from 0
- In progress: 0
- Pending: 5 ← Changed from 6

**Next task**: Task 2: Database Schema ← Update this

3. Update Story File Checkboxes (story-based only)

If this is a story-based task, update the PM story file at docs/reference/pm/stories/:

### Backend Tasks

- [x] Task 1: Define Types ← Changed from [ ]
- [ ] Task 2: Database Schema
- [ ] Task 3: Repository Layer

Key Rules

• ALWAYS read task file first
• ALWAYS read all constraint files before writing any code
• MUST run verification command for each step
• ALWAYS run tests before marking task complete
• MUST update task file (mark AC, update status)

Common Mistakes

• ❌ Start without reading task file → ✅ ALWAYS read task file first
• ❌ Skip reading constraints → ✅ ALWAYS read before coding
• ❌ Skip verification → ✅ Run verify command for each step
• ❌ Skip tests → ✅ Run tests before marking complete
• ❌ Forget to update task file → ✅ Update AC and status

---

TDD Deep Dive

The TDD Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST

Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.

Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

RED → Verify Fails → GREEN → Verify Passes → REFACTOR → Repeat

1. RED - Write Failing Test

test('UserService creates user with hashed password', async () => {
  const userData = { email: '[e-mail]', password: 'password123' };
  const user = await userService.create(userData);
  expect(user.email).toBe('[e-mail]');
  expect(user.password).not.toBe('password123');
});

2. Verify RED - Watch It Fail

npm test -- --watch user.service

3. GREEN - Write Minimal Code

Write simplest code to pass the test. Don't add features not in test.

4. Verify GREEN - Watch It Pass

5. REFACTOR - Clean Up

Only after green. Keep tests passing.

Testing Best Practices

1. Test behavior, not implementation details
2. Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario
3. Follow Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
4. Mock external dependencies (DB, APIs)

Test Coverage Requirements

Component Type	Required Tests
Service	Business logic, error handling
Repository	CRUD operations, query methods
Controller	Request handling, response format
Middleware	Request processing, error handling

TDD Red Flags - STOP and Start Over

• Code before test
• Test passes immediately
• Testing implementation details
• No assertions in test

---

Example Workflow

# User: "Implement story-user-api Task 1"

1. ✓ Read task: docs/reference/backend/tasks/story-user-api.md
2. ✓ Read constraints:
   - constraints.md

3. ✓ Execute Step 1: Define data types
   → Run: npx tsc --noEmit
   → ✓ Pass

4. ✓ Execute Step 2: Create database schema
   → Run: npm run migrate
   → ✓ Pass

5. ✓ Execute Step 3: Implement repository layer
   → Run: npm test user.repository
   → ✓ Pass

6. ✓ Execute Step 4: Add unit tests
   → Run: npm test user
   → ✓ 5 tests passed

7. ✓ Run full test suite
   → Run: npm test
   → ✓ All tests passed

8. ✓ Run build
   → Run: npm run build
   → ✓ Build successful

9. ✓ Update task file:
   - Marked all AC as completed
   - Status: completed

10. ✓ Task completed!

Iron Law

NO CODE WITHOUT TASK FILE

This rule is non-negotiable. Before writing code:

1. Task file must exist
2. Acceptance criteria must be defined
3. Implementation steps must be clear

Rationalization Defense

Excuse	Reality
"It's a simple change"	Simple changes often have hidden complexity
"I'll document after coding"	Post-hoc documentation is always incomplete
"Tests can wait until later"	Untested code is broken code
"I know what needs to be done"	Assumptions without validation cause bugs