메뉴
Analyze competitor IP portfolios — comparative patent portfolio reports with strategy inference. Budget: 120 patent families, 15 claim parses, 40 web searches.
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill competitive-intelligence명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | competitive-intelligence |
| description | Analyze competitor IP portfolios — comparative patent portfolio reports with strategy inference. Budget: 120 patent families, 15 claim parses, 40 web searches. |
| execution | strategy |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["classification-navigation","knowledge-acquisition-claim-decomposition","patent-family-tracing"],"sops":["assignee-normalization","citation-network-analysis","claim-parsing","knowledge-acquisition-saturation-detection","legal-status-assessment","patent-categorization","patent-query-formulation","patent-synthesis","quality-scoring","trend-analysis"]} |
Analyzes competitor patent portfolios to infer R&D strategy, identify strengths and weaknesses, and produce comparative intelligence reports.
Profile competitor IP portfolios to understand their technology focus, filing strategy, geographic coverage, and potential future directions. Enables strategic IP positioning.
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Patent families analyzed | 120 |
| Claim parses | 15 |
| Web searches completed | 40 |
| Metric | Target | Current | % |
|---|
| Patent families analyzed | 120 | 0 | 0% |
| Claim parses completed | 15 | 0 | 0% |
| Web searches completed | 40 | 0 | 0% |
| Competitors profiled | — | 0 | — |
| Portfolio comparisons | — | 0 | — |
HARD-GATE: Cannot exit iteration loop until 80% of patent families (96), claim parses (12), and web searches (32) budget met.
| Tactic | When to Use |
|---|---|
| patent-family-tracing | Build complete portfolio for each competitor |
| classification-navigation | Map competitor technology focus areas |
| claim-decomposition | Analyze claim scope of competitor key patents |
| SOP | Role in This Strategy |
|---|---|
| patent-query-formulation | Generate assignee-focused search queries |
| assignee-normalization | Resolve subsidiary/parent relationships |
| patent-categorization | Classify competitor patents by technology area |
| citation-network-analysis | Map inter-competitor citation relationships |
| trend-analysis | Analyze competitor filing velocity and direction |
| claim-parsing | Parse key competitor claims for scope analysis |
| quality-scoring | Assess competitor patent quality distribution |
| legal-status-assessment | Determine active vs. expired competitor IP |
| saturation-detection | Confirm portfolio coverage is complete |
| patent-synthesis | Produce competitive intelligence report |
assignee-normalizationpatent-query-formulationpatent-family-tracingpatent-categorizationtrend-analysiscitation-network-analysisclaim-parsingquality-scoringpatent-synthesis# Competitive Patent Intelligence: [Technology Domain]
## Competitor Profiles
### [Competitor A]
- Portfolio size: [N] families
- Technology focus: [top IPC classes]
- Filing trend: [increasing/stable/declining]
- Geographic coverage: [jurisdictions]
- Key patents: [top 3 by quality score]
## Comparative Analysis
| Metric | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Total families | | | |
| Filing velocity (last 3yr) | | | |
| Avg quality score | | | |
| Geographic breadth | | | |
## Citation Network
[Inter-competitor citation patterns and influence]
## Strategic Inferences
[R&D direction, potential acquisitions, licensing opportunities]
## Recommendations
[Positioning strategy relative to competitors]
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| classification-navigation | IPC/CPC hierarchy drill-down and lateral expansion for patent discovery |
| knowledge-acquisition-claim-decomposition | Independent/dependent claim parsing, element extraction, and feature mapping to technical domains |
| patent-family-tracing | Forward/backward patent citation and priority tracing until saturation |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| assignee-normalization | Standardize assignee names and identify corporate group affiliations across patent offices |
| citation-network-analysis | Build and analyze patent citation networks — main path analysis, PageRank, cluster detection |
| claim-parsing | Patent claim syntax parsing — independent/dependent relationships and element extraction |
| knowledge-acquisition-saturation-detection | Determine when additional searching yields diminishing returns. Analyzes the latest expansion batch against existing corpus to judge continue/near-saturation/saturated. Used by snowball and systematic-survey. |
| legal-status-assessment | Determine patent legal status — active, expired, pending, lapsed, or revoked |
| patent-categorization | Classify patents by tech subdomain, application scenario, and value chain position |
| patent-query-formulation | Construct keyword + IPC/CPC + assignee combination search strategies for patent databases |
| patent-synthesis | Produce final structured patent intelligence report from all analysis results |
| quality-scoring | Multi-dimensional patent quality assessment — forward citations, family size, claim count, geographic breadth |
| trend-analysis | Patent filing volume time-series, technology lifecycle stage, and S-curve analysis |