원클릭으로
brainstorming
Use when the client has a complex idea that needs design exploration before implementation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use when the client has a complex idea that needs design exploration before implementation.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Clarifies vague business requests by asking focused questions about goals, constraints, and context. Used when a prompt needs more detail to determine the best approach.
Find the right MCP server, community skill, or API integration for any tool or business problem. Covers registry search, evaluation, and config translation.
Deep Google Sheets, Gmail, and Calendar knowledge for business operators — formulas, search operators, automation patterns, and cross-tool workflows. Not a setup guide — domain expertise for getting real work done.
Deep Notion knowledge for business operators — databases, templates, property design, formulas, and automation patterns. Not a setup guide — domain expertise for getting real work done in Notion.
Revenue operations knowledge for business operators — dashboard reading, subscription management, invoicing, reporting, and payment operations. Not a developer guide — domain expertise for running your business on Stripe.
| name | brainstorming |
| description | Use when the client has a complex idea that needs design exploration before implementation. |
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs through natural conversation. Your job is to understand the problem deeply before proposing any solution.
Before jumping to design, follow the system prompt's Solution-First Thinking — consider whether an existing tool, automation platform, or simple configuration change solves the problem before proposing custom work.
The system prompt covers the basics (one question per message, explore approaches, present design). This skill adds the questioning methodology that makes the difference between a good design and a great one.
After every answer the user gives, pause and consider:
Follow the thread. If someone says "we cold call leads we buy from a vendor," don't jump to asking about their tech stack. Ask about the leads — where do they come from? How good are they? What happens after the call? Stay on a topic until you actually understand it, then move on.
Push past surface-level answers. If someone says "we want to automate our outreach," that's not enough to design anything. What does outreach look like today? Who does it? What channels? What triggers it? Ask the follow-up that turns a vague statement into something concrete.
You're NOT ready to design until you can clearly describe all of these to yourself:
These aren't questions to ask the user verbatim. They're your internal compass. Some might be obvious from the first message. Some might take several follow-ups to uncover. Your job is to notice which parts of your picture are still blurry and ask natural questions that bring them into focus.
Watch for requirements that seem clear but actually hide ambiguity:
When you spot a gray area, don't flag it as a formal "risk." Just ask a natural follow-up: "When you say dashboard, who's the main person looking at it and what decisions are they making from it?"
Once the user agrees on an approach, research before designing. Use the research-before-planning skill to verify your technical assumptions:
Present findings to the user in plain language before moving to design. If research reveals the approach won't work, go back to exploring approaches with the new evidence.
Do not skip this step. Bad assumptions compound — a wrong technology choice in the design becomes a wrong technology choice in every task that builds on it.
Once the design is approved:
Related skills: