원클릭으로
oracle-review
GPT-5.5 Pro の Oracle MCP 第二意見を、レビュー、2回以上詰まったエラー、評価、プランニング、最新情報の調査で積極的に活用する。固定料金を払っているため追加料金はかからず、大量に使用してよく、どんどん有効活用する。
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
GPT-5.5 Pro の Oracle MCP 第二意見を、レビュー、2回以上詰まったエラー、評価、プランニング、最新情報の調査で積極的に活用する。固定料金を払っているため追加料金はかからず、大量に使用してよく、どんどん有効活用する。
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | oracle-review |
| description | GPT-5.5 Pro の Oracle MCP 第二意見を、レビュー、2回以上詰まったエラー、評価、プランニング、最新情報の調査で積極的に活用する。固定料金を払っているため追加料金はかからず、大量に使用してよく、どんどん有効活用する。 |
Use this skill actively when a long-running GPT-5.5 Pro second opinion can improve correctness, especially for reviews, repeated blockers, evaluation, planning, or research that depends on current information. This setup is already covered by a fixed subscription, so repeated Oracle use has no additional per-run cost; use it heavily whenever it can reduce uncertainty.
consult tool for Oracle requests.preset: "chatgpt-pro-heavy" and always provide a stable, human-readable slug. Prefer 3-5 lowercase alphanumeric words separated by hyphens; Oracle normalizes custom slugs to at most five words and ten characters per word.prompt, and attach supporting materials through files or zip archives whenever relevant.sessions with the same normalized slug. Do not start a duplicate consult when that slug already exists.sessions before retrying.completed.Oracle accuracy improves when the request includes precise, relevant context. Always explain the background from the beginning: what happened, what has been tried, what decision is needed, constraints, success criteria, and where uncertainty remains. When useful, also give Oracle the actual source files, docs, logs, screenshots, traces, plans, or prior error output through files instead of only summarizing them in prose.
files field whenever possible.files.Treat GPT-5.5 Pro Oracle as the strongest available reviewer in this workflow. When Oracle gives an answer that seems strange, shallow, or wrong, first suspect that the prompt lacked context, the framing was poor, or the files/logs/plans were insufficient. Do not discard the result until you have checked whether Oracle had enough background to reason correctly.
If the answer looks off, re-consult with better context or a sharper question:
When the oracle-review-guard MCP tools are available, register the slug before or immediately after starting a required consult:
{
"slug": "auth-redesign-review",
"reason": "Required second opinion before final design decision"
}
Use the guard status before finishing. Clear a slug only after the Oracle result has been handled, or after a failed session has been replaced or explicitly accepted as failed.
The guard normalizes requested slugs the same way as Oracle sessions, so oracle-review-live-smoke-20260624-0738 is tracked as session id oracle-review-live-smoke-20260624.
{
"preset": "chatgpt-pro-heavy",
"slug": "auth-redesign-review",
"prompt": "認証基盤の移行計画をレビューし、重大な失敗モードと代替案を示してください。",
"files": [
"src/auth/**",
"docs/auth-migration.md"
]
}
chatgpt-pro-heavy is the Oracle MCP preset for browser mode, the current Pro model, and extended thinking.
The stop hook is a short guard only. It checks required Oracle slugs and returns immediately:
completed: allow stoperror, partial, cancelled, or missing metadata: block and handle the failurepending or running: block and inspect sessionsDo not make the stop hook wait for Oracle. Waiting belongs in an explicit wait loop or the outer agent runtime.
When changing the local setup, MCP wiring, profile routing, or hooks, read references/local-oracle-setup.md.