메뉴
Use when the user wants to query Semantic Scholar for paper metadata, citations, references, author profiles, or semantic literature search results.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | semantic-scholar |
| description | Use when the user wants to query Semantic Scholar for paper metadata, citations, references, author profiles, or semantic literature search results. |
Queries the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph API for paper metadata, citations, references, author profiles, and semantic search. High-coverage index of 200M+ papers across all scientific fields with structured, machine-readable data.
s2.search(
query="few-shot learning protein structure prediction",
fields=["title", "authors", "year", "citationCount", "tldr"],
limit=20
)
s2.get_citations(
paper_id="arXiv:1706.03762",
fields=["title", "year", "authors"],
limit=50
)
s2.get_author(
name="Yoshua Bengio",
fields=["hIndex", "citationCount", "papers"]
)
s2.batch_lookup(
ids=["DOI:10.1038/...", "DOI:10.1101/..."],
fields=["title", "abstract", "tldr", "openAccessPdf"]
)
Returns structured JSON with paper metadata. TLDRs are available for most papers published after 2018. OpenAccessPdf field provides direct PDF URL when available.
related_work_scout for metadata, citations, and reference chasingUse when the user wants to monitor arXiv for new papers by topic or author and produce a ranked digest of relevant preprints.
Use when the user wants to identify open research gaps, unresolved questions, or methodological blind spots across a literature corpus.
Use when the user wants to draft or revise a paper, conference, or journal abstract for a specific audience, structure, or word limit.
Use when the user wants to generate citation-aware manuscript sections or full research drafts grounded in the team's literature base.
Use when the user wants to draft concise conference rebuttals under response-period constraints and prioritize which reviewer concerns to address.
Use when the user wants to draft structured responses to peer review comments, supported by evidence and relevant literature.