// Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for an Economic-Research manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical theory references are missing.
Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for an Economic-Research manuscript. Enforces five-dimension priority and theoretical-justification discipline.
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for an Economic-Research manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study). Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.
Use when designing or writing mechanism analyses for an Economic-Research empirical manuscript. Mechanism tests are near-mandatory for empirical submissions.
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of an Economic-Research manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level rather than the actionable / ministry level used by Management-World.
Use when responding to reviewer reports for an Economic-Research R&R. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits.
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《经济研究》 — format, word count, double-blind, references, anti-plagiarism, author info, and supplementary files.
| name | er-literature-review |
| description | Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for an Economic-Research manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical theory references are missing. |
《经济研究》偏好三层结构的综述：
《经济研究》更看重理论文献是否到位。一篇没引 Acemoglu / Aghion / Helpman / Krugman / North / 林毅夫 / 钱颖一 / 周黎安等理论或经典作者的稿件，会被审稿人挑出。
经验法则：
[作者 (年份)] 利用[数据 / 方法]研究了[问题]，发现……。
然而，该研究[局限]，未考虑[本文要补的空白]。
与之相比，本文……。
每段综述至少出现一次"与之相比 / 区别于 / 本文延伸了 / 本文补充了"。
【结构】三层 / 两层 / 一层
【中英配比】中文 X% / 英文 Y%
【理论文献占比】X%
【五年内文献比例】X%
【顶刊比例】X%
【缺漏清单】[...]
【下一步】er-identification