| name | culture-articulation |
| description | Use when articulating or revising company values and culture — covers behavioral anchoring, decision-priority hierarchy, and operationalization. |
Culture Articulation
Core Frame
Culture is the pattern of behavior the company rewards, tolerates, and punishes. Values are the stated intent about that pattern. The gap between stated values and operating culture is where most failure happens.
The articulation goal: values that are specific, behavioral, decision-useful, tested, few — and that show up in hiring, performance, and exits.
What Good Values Look Like
- Specific: "We move fast" beats "We embrace agility"
- Behavioral: name the action, not the feeling
- Decision-useful: when two values conflict, the priority is named
- Tested: "If X then Y" — what would this value require us to not do?
- Few: 3–7. More than 7 means none.
Bad values:
- Buzzwords without behaviors (excellence, innovation, synergy)
- Values nobody could disagree with (integrity, respect)
- Values with no implication for action
Articulation Process
Workshop Approach (1–2 days)
- Diagnose current culture: interviews, observations, employee voice. What's actually rewarded? What's tolerated? What's punished?
- Identify aspirational behaviors: what does the company need to be more of?
- Draft values: 3–7 candidates with behavioral anchors
- Test with cases: when has this value been demonstrated? When has it been violated?
- Decision-priority hierarchy: when values conflict, which wins?
- Operationalize plan: how will this show up in hiring, performance, recognition, exits?
- Communicate: roll out with stories, not just words
Behavioral Anchors
For each value, define:
- What it looks like in practice (observable behavior; specific examples)
- What it doesn't look like (counter-examples; bright lines)
- What we'd reward (recognition, promotion patterns)
- What we'd push back on (feedback patterns; never-tolerate behaviors)
Example:
Value: "Tell the truth"
- Looks like: surfacing problems early; honest performance feedback; transparent communication during hard times; admitting "I don't know"
- Doesn't look like: filtering bad news; saying yes when meaning maybe; performative agreement
- Reward: managers who deliver hard feedback well; employees who push back with evidence
- Push back on: "managing up" patterns; surface alignment with private dissent
Decision Priority Hierarchy
When values conflict, name which wins:
- "We prioritize customer trust over short-term growth"
- "We prioritize team performance over individual heroics"
- "We prioritize transparency over comfort"
Without this, values become ornamental.
Operationalization
Values must show up in:
- Hiring: questions and rubric items target the values
- Onboarding: explicit narration of what values mean here, with examples
- Performance: behaviors aligned to values part of rubric
- Recognition: praise tied to specific values-aligned behavior
- Termination: people who violate the values get exited (the most powerful signal)
- Promotion: values demonstrated as a criterion for advancement
If a value has no implication in any of these, it isn't a value.
Common Failures
- Buzzword values nobody can repeat
- Values nobody could disagree with
- Values that contradict actual practice (e.g., "transparency" while withholding comp bands)
- 12 values (= no values)
- Values exercise produces a poster; nothing changes
- Stated culture aimed at recruiting candidates rather than guiding employees
- Founder behavior contradicts stated values (loudest culture signal)
Refresh Cadence
Annual review of:
- Are these still the right values?
- Have they stuck?
- Where's the gap between stated and operating?
- What needs to change?
Don't change values frequently — but re-test their operationalization regularly.
Sample Values Sets (Reference)
For inspiration, not copying:
- Netflix: "Judgment, Communication, Curiosity, Courage, Passion, Selflessness, Innovation, Inclusion, Integrity, Impact" — operationalized aggressively in the culture deck
- Stripe: "Move with urgency and focus. Trust and amplify. Optimize globally. Operate with rigor."
- Patagonia: "Build the best product. Cause no unnecessary harm. Use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis."
What's notable: each is specific, with implications. None is "we believe in excellence."
Cross-References
culture-architect agent
psychological-safety skill
inclusion-belonging skill
change-management skill
Key References
- McCord, P. (2017). Powerful.
- Coyle, D. (2018). The Culture Code.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership.
- Horowitz, B. (2019). What You Do Is Who You Are.