원클릭으로 Manus에서 모든 스킬 실행

$pwd:

contract-review-risk-scoring

Name: Contract Review Risk Scoring
Author: eigent-ai

// Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.

Manus에서 실행

$ git log --oneline --stat

stars:11

forks:0

updated:2026년 5월 26일 15:17

SKILL.md

readonly

name	contract-review-risk-scoring
description	Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.
metadata	{"source-repo":"https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill"}

Contract Review & Risk Scoring

Focused contract review built on CUAD (41 risk categories), ContractEval benchmarks, and LegalBench.

Source Repository

GitHub: evolsb/claude-legal-skill
Install upstream: npx skills add evolsb/claude-legal-skill

Covers NDAs, SaaS/MSA, M&A, payment agreements, and finder/broker agreements.

`/review [contract] as [your position]`

Core skill. Reads the full contract, maps clauses against CUAD's 41 risk categories, assigns severity (low / medium / high / critical), benchmarks key terms against market norms, and outputs a prioritised fix list with concrete redline language. Finishes with an overall Contract Safety Score.

Workflow:

Confirm document type and user's position (customer, vendor, receiving party, acquirer, etc.).
Parse and enumerate all material clauses.
Score each clause against CUAD risk categories.
Benchmark flagged terms vs market norms.
Assign negotiability rating per issue (easy / moderate / hard).
Draft specific redline language for top issues.
Output Contract Safety Score (0–100) with summary.

Output structure:

## Contract Safety Score: [score]/100

## Critical Issues (fix before signing)
## High / Medium / Low Issues
## Market Benchmark Comparison
## Recommended Redlines (prioritised)
## Negotiation Strategy Notes

Example Prompts

Review this NDA [paste] — I'm the receiving party. Flag unusual confidentiality scope, one-sided carve-outs, non-compete buried in obligations. Contract Safety Score + top 3 redlines.
Review this SaaS subscription agreement [paste] — I'm the customer. Check liability caps, data ownership, unilateral change clauses, auto-renewal. Compare to market norms.
Review this LOI [paste] — I'm the acquirer. Flag provisions locking us in early, limiting diligence rights, or unusual exclusivity. Score overall risk; critical issues first.

Guardrails

This is decision support, not legal advice. Include a disclaimer when delivering output.
Do not skip boilerplate — buried risk often lives in definitions and general provisions.
When contract text is incomplete, state what cannot be assessed.
Prefer specific redline language over vague "negotiate this" notes.

related-skills.json

같은 저장소

changelog-generator.md

from "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

Transform git commit history into polished user-facing changelogs and release notes. Use when the user wants a CHANGELOG.md from a version tag or date range, weekly product updates, app store release notes, or Keep a Changelog formatted output with internal noise filtered out.

2026-05-2611

remotion.md

from "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

Create videos programmatically using React (Remotion) or generate mathematical/conceptual animations (Manim). Use when the user asks to make a video, animation, product demo, tutorial, social clip, or branded video pipeline. Triggers: /remotion-video, /video-animation, /video-toolkit

2026-05-2611

humanizer.md

from "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

Detect and rewrite AI writing patterns to make content sound authentically human. Supports voice calibration from the author's own writing samples. Use when asked to humanize text, remove AI patterns, calibrate voice, audit content for AI detectability, or check if writing sounds like ChatGPT. Triggers: /humanize, /voice-calibrate, /audit-ai

2026-05-2611

claude-for-legal.md

from "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

Full legal plugin suite for commercial contract review, privacy/DPA analysis, and AI governance vendor reviews. Use when the user invokes /commercial-legal:review, /privacy-legal:dpa-review, /ai-governance-legal:vendor-ai-review, renewal tracking, DSAR responses, or EU AI Act triage.

2026-05-2611

legal-work-plugin.md

from "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

In-house legal workflows for contract review against playbooks, NDA triage with GREEN/YELLOW/RED ratings, compliance briefings, and vendor checks. Use when the user invokes /review-contract, /triage-nda, /legal-risk-assessment, or /vendor-check for organisation-standard legal analysis.

2026-05-2611

pm-skills.md

from "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

Product management workflows covering the full work lifecycle — discovery, strategy, execution, launch, and growth. Write PRDs, plan OKRs, and structure meeting notes. Useful beyond PMs — applicable to any knowledge worker managing projects, stakeholders, or strategy. Triggers: /write-prd, /plan-okrs, /meeting-notes

2026-05-2611

package.json

"author": "eigent-ai"

"repository": "eigent-ai/agent-skills"

GitHub 저장소 열기 Creator 저장소 보기

$ install --global

$ download --local

Manus에서 실행

name	contract-review-risk-scoring
description	Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.
metadata	{"source-repo":"https://github.com/evolsb/claude-legal-skill"}

Contract Review & Risk Scoring

Focused contract review built on CUAD (41 risk categories), ContractEval benchmarks, and LegalBench.

Source Repository

GitHub: evolsb/claude-legal-skill
Install upstream: npx skills add evolsb/claude-legal-skill

Covers NDAs, SaaS/MSA, M&A, payment agreements, and finder/broker agreements.

`/review [contract] as [your position]`

Workflow:

Confirm document type and user's position (customer, vendor, receiving party, acquirer, etc.).
Parse and enumerate all material clauses.
Score each clause against CUAD risk categories.
Benchmark flagged terms vs market norms.
Assign negotiability rating per issue (easy / moderate / hard).
Draft specific redline language for top issues.
Output Contract Safety Score (0–100) with summary.

Output structure:

## Contract Safety Score: [score]/100

## Critical Issues (fix before signing)
## High / Medium / Low Issues
## Market Benchmark Comparison
## Recommended Redlines (prioritised)
## Negotiation Strategy Notes

Example Prompts

Review this NDA [paste] — I'm the receiving party. Flag unusual confidentiality scope, one-sided carve-outs, non-compete buried in obligations. Contract Safety Score + top 3 redlines.
Review this SaaS subscription agreement [paste] — I'm the customer. Check liability caps, data ownership, unilateral change clauses, auto-renewal. Compare to market norms.
Review this LOI [paste] — I'm the acquirer. Flag provisions locking us in early, limiting diligence rights, or unusual exclusivity. Score overall risk; critical issues first.

Guardrails

This is decision support, not legal advice. Include a disclaimer when delivering output.
Do not skip boilerplate — buried risk often lives in definitions and general provisions.
When contract text is incomplete, state what cannot be assessed.
Prefer specific redline language over vague "negotiate this" notes.

contract-review-risk-scoring

Contract Review & Risk Scoring

Source Repository

/review [contract] as [your position]

Example Prompts

Guardrails

이 저장소의 다른 Skills

이 저장소의 다른 Skills

Contract Review & Risk Scoring

Source Repository

/review [contract] as [your position]

Example Prompts

Guardrails

`/review [contract] as [your position]`

`/review [contract] as [your position]`