// Entry point for all users. Comprehensive site diagnostic that identifies all compliance gaps across Content, Technical, UX, Policy, and Trust pillars. Generates prioritized action plan.
Convert SCB scoring output into a prioritized remediation and re-evaluation plan with veto-first sequencing, pillar-weight impact sizing, and explicit recheck checkpoints.
Classify page/content type for SCB, resolve profile-specific weights and extension items, and output a normalized scoring manifest for downstream SCB skills and reports.
Setup automated monitoring for ongoing AdSense compliance. Configure rules, alert thresholds, and monitoring workflows to detect and prevent violations post-approval.
Verify all affiliate link disclosures for FTC, ASA, and international compliance. Finds undisclosed affiliate links and ensures proper format.
Run ARB-style audits across multiple sites, normalize results, rank client opportunities, and produce white-label delivery outputs for agencies and consultants.
Assess AI-generated content risk, value-add depth, disclosure practices, and human editorial oversight for AdSense and broader publisher monetization readiness.
| name | ads-readiness-assessment |
| description | Entry point for all users. Comprehensive site diagnostic that identifies all compliance gaps across Content, Technical, UX, Policy, and Trust pillars. Generates prioritized action plan. |
Conduct a comprehensive diagnostic of your website's readiness for Google AdSense approval. Produces a prioritized list of issues and guides you to appropriate remediation skills.
Input: Website URL or local project path Output: Interactive diagnostic report + prioritized issue list + recommended next steps Time: 15-30 minutes for full assessment
This skill is responsible for choosing and declaring the audit scope before results are aggregated.
Core 79, Core 79 + Profile, Full 105Core 79 + Profile for one clearly identified primary site typeFull 105 when the site spans multiple business models or the brief explicitly requires full-scope reviewCore 79 is acceptable as long as the report says so explicitlyEvery output from this skill should declare:
score_modeprimary_site_typeselected_profile_itemstriggered_extension_itemsevaluated_item_countAnswer initial questions about your site:
Automatically or semi-automatically assess 5 key dimensions:
content-audit) - Is your content original, substantial, and well-structured?technical-audit) - Is your infrastructure sound and performant?ux-compliance-audit) - Is your site accessible and user-friendly?policy-risk-scanner) - Are you avoiding prohibited content and practices?Receive a detailed report showing:
Based on your diagnostic results:
resubmission-readiness-check and submitrejection-root-cause-analysisdigraph assessment {
"Provide Site Info" [shape=box];
"Content Audit" [shape=box];
"Technical Audit" [shape=box];
"UX Audit" [shape=box];
"Policy Scan" [shape=box];
"Trust Assessment" [shape=box];
"Generate Report" [shape=box];
"Review Results" [shape=diamond];
"Critical Issues?" [shape=diamond];
"All Green?" [shape=diamond];
"Route to Skills" [shape=doublecircle];
"Provide Site Info" -> "Content Audit";
"Content Audit" -> "Technical Audit";
"Technical Audit" -> "UX Audit";
"UX Audit" -> "Policy Scan";
"Policy Scan" -> "Trust Assessment";
"Trust Assessment" -> "Generate Report";
"Generate Report" -> "Review Results";
"Review Results" -> "Critical Issues?";
"Critical Issues?" -> "Route to Skills" [label="yes, prioritize"];
"Critical Issues?" -> "All Green?" [label="no"];
"All Green?" -> "Route to Skills" [label="yes, submit"];
"All Green?" -> "Route to Skills" [label="no, improve"];
}
Questions addressed: Is content original, substantial, valuable, and properly structured?
Output includes:
Related skills for improvement: content-improvement-blueprint
Questions addressed: Is infrastructure sound, performant, and secure?
Output includes:
Related skills for improvement: technical-remediation-guide
Questions addressed: Is the site accessible, navigable, and ad-friendly?
Output includes:
Related skills for improvement: ux-optimization-roadmap
Questions addressed: Are you avoiding prohibited content and protecting user data?
Output includes:
Related skills for improvement: policy-remediation-plan
Questions addressed: Is your site transparent, credible, and properly disclosing relationships?
Output includes:
Related skills for improvement: trust-credibility-strategy
Structured data suitable for programmatic processing:
{
"assessment_date": "2026-05-03T10:30:00Z",
"site_url": "https://example.com",
"score_mode": "Core 79 + Profile",
"primary_site_type": "blog",
"selected_profile_items": ["CI15", "CI17", "CI18"],
"triggered_extension_items": ["UX18"],
"evaluated_item_count": 83,
"overall_score": 72,
"pillars": {
"content_integrity": {
"score": 85,
"status": "good",
"critical_issues": [],
"high_issues": [],
"medium_issues": [...]
},
...
},
"next_steps": [...]
}
Human-readable diagnostic summary with:
Step-by-step questionnaire covering:
This skill acts as orchestrator and entry point:
[ads-readiness-assessment] coordinates with:
├─→ [content-audit]
├─→ [technical-audit]
├─→ [ux-compliance-audit]
├─→ [policy-risk-scanner]
├─→ [affiliate-link-compliance]
├─→ [copyright-ip-check]
└─→ [seo-spam-detection]
Then routes user to appropriate improvement skills:
├─→ [content-improvement-blueprint]
├─→ [technical-remediation-guide]
├─→ [ux-optimization-roadmap]
├─→ [policy-remediation-plan]
└─→ [trust-credibility-strategy]
Final verification before submission:
└─→ [resubmission-readiness-check]
Input a live website URL:
Analyze a local project directory:
Interactive guided assessment:
When assessment is complete:
Your site passes all criteria → Go directly to resubmission-readiness-check for final verification
Only one area needs work → Focus improvements in that single skill
Several pillars have issues → Use provided priority ranking to sequence work
Use output as input to rejection-root-cause-analysis to map Google's feedback to specific issues
Next Skills:
content-improvement-blueprint, technical-remediation-guide, etc.resubmission-readiness-checkrejection-root-cause-analysisactive-compliance-monitor