sglang-diffusion-ako4all-kernel

name	sglang-diffusion-ako4all-kernel
description	Use when optimizing an existing SGLang diffusion kernel with AKO4ALL, including AKO4ALL repo hygiene, custom microbench setup, ncu-guided iteration, and end-to-end denoise validation. Also use when a sibling AKO4ALL repo must be cloned or refreshed before starting kernel tuning work.

SGLang Diffusion AKO4ALL Kernel

Use this skill to run the full AKO4ALL-based optimization loop for an existing SGLang diffusion kernel. It is the default implementation path once the benchmark/profile skill has already shown that a hotspot is real and not covered by an existing fast path. This workflow bootstraps a custom AKO harness, benchmarks and profiles the kernel, iterates with ncu, ports the best version back to sglang, then validates with targeted tests and model-level denoise runs.

This skill assumes a sibling repo layout like:

<base-dir>/
├── sglang/
└── AKO4ALL/

If AKO4ALL/ is missing under the current base directory, clone it first.

Use This Skill When

• tuning an existing diffusion Triton, CUDA JIT, CuTeDSL, or runtime-integrated kernel in sglang
• sglang-diffusion-benchmark-profile has already ruled out an existing in-repo fast path or overlap family
• creating a custom AKO4ALL harness for a real diffusion kernel instead of using the default benchmark tasks
• validating that a kernel-level win transfers to Qwen, FLUX, Wan, Hunyuan, MOVA, or other diffusion denoise latency
• preparing PR artifacts such as microbench tables, ncu before/after data, and proof image outputs

Do not start here when the bottleneck has not been proven yet. First use ../sglang-diffusion-benchmark-profile/SKILL.md to:

• measure the real denoise regression
• collect the perf dump baseline
• capture one representative torch.profiler trace
• rule out existing mainline fast paths
• prove the run stayed on the native SGLang diffusion backend, not a diffusers fallback

Before opening AKO, also read ../sglang-diffusion-benchmark-profile/existing-fast-paths.md. It records current mainline fusions plus the open PR watchlist for diffusion kernel, VAE, attention, cache, and scheduling work. If an open PR already covers the same shape family, use it as prior art or decide whether to rebase/extend it instead of starting a duplicate kernel.

If a future specialized optimization skill matches the kernel family better than AKO4ALL, hand off there instead. The diagnosis contract stays the same.

Mandatory AKO4ALL Preflight

Before any AKO work:

1. Run scripts/ensure_ako4all_clean.sh [base-dir].
2. If <base-dir>/AKO4ALL does not exist, the script clones it.
3. Do not continue unless AKO4ALL is:
   • on the upstream default branch, usually main
   • fully clean with no tracked or untracked local changes
   • exactly synced to upstream/<default-branch>
4. If the script reports local commits, divergence, or a dirty worktree, stop and clean or re-clone the repo before continuing.

The script creates an upstream remote automatically when missing. By default it uses the existing origin URL, or AKO4ALL_URL if you need to override the clone source.

Workflow

1. Scope the Kernel

• Identify the exact kernel entry point and runtime call sites in sglang.
• Record the target shapes, dtypes, model families, and whether the kernel is on a hot path.
• Reuse existing unit tests and benchmark entry points when they already exist.
• Record whether the hotspot overlaps an open PR from existing-fast-paths.md; if it does, note the PR number in the AKO context and final PR artifacts.

2. Bootstrap the AKO Harness

Inside the clean AKO4ALL repo:

• read TASK.md and HINTS.md
• create a custom harness instead of relying on the stock benchmark tasks
• mirror the real SGLang kernel into:
  • input/reference.py
  • input/<kernel>.py
  • solution/<kernel>.py
  • bench/bench_<kernel>.py
• keep a short context note in context/ when the kernel has model-specific shape assumptions or perf conclusions

The custom benchmark should:

• cover representative diffusion shapes
• check correctness against the reference kernel
• report aggregate runtime plus per-shape results when useful

3. Establish the Baseline

• run the AKO custom microbench before changing the kernel
• capture one representative ncu baseline on the hottest meaningful shape
• note whether the bottleneck looks like registers, occupancy, instruction count, launch config, or memory latency

4. Iterate in AKO4ALL

• change one idea at a time
• rerun the microbench after every change
• update ITERATIONS.md with hypothesis, result, and next step
• prefer simple, explainable wins over clever rewrites that do not transfer

After 3 consecutive no-improvement or regression iterations:

• rerun ncu
• re-read ITERATIONS.md
• change direction instead of continuing blind sweeps

5. Port the Best Version Back to SGLang

• apply the best candidate to the real sglang kernel file
• run import or syntax checks and targeted tests first
• keep the AKO solution/ version aligned with the main-tree version you actually want to keep

6. Validate on Real Models

• use the benchmark/profile skill for denoise perf dumps and before/after comparison
• prefer exact local snapshot validation when testing local edits on a GPU box
• run targeted kernel tests first
• run model-level denoise benchmarks with perf dumps
• compare baseline vs optimized runs with compare_perf.py
• if the PR needs proof that generation still works, save one real model output image

7. Prepare PR Artifacts

At minimum, keep:

• one microbench table
• one denoise-stage table
• one end-to-end table
• one ncu before/after pair on the most representative kernel shape
• one generated image when the kernel affects production inference

See references/ako-loop.md for the checklist and common stop rules.

Operating Rules

• Treat AKO4ALL repo hygiene as a gate, not a suggestion.
• Prefer exact local snapshot validation over hand-wavy “remote tree is close enough”.
• Do not start or justify kernel work from traces collected after Falling back to diffusers backend, Using diffusers backend, or Loaded diffusers pipeline; fix backend selection and rerun the benchmark/profile workflow first.
• Keep model-level validation honest: if microbench improves but denoise does not, do not keep the AKO-only variant in the main code path.
• When writing conclusions, explain the win in terms of measurable causes such as lower registers per thread, higher occupancy, fewer executed instructions, or better scheduler eligibility.