원클릭으로
standup
Facilitate a read-only standup across git worktrees, branches, or PRs to compare changes and produce one consolidation plan.
메뉴
Facilitate a read-only standup across git worktrees, branches, or PRs to compare changes and produce one consolidation plan.
Token-optimized structural code search using tree-sitter AST parsing. Use instead of reading full files when you need to understand code structure, find functions, or explore a codebase efficiently.
Create a detailed, phased implementation plan with documentation discovery. Use when asked to plan a feature, task, or multi-step implementation — especially before executing with do.
Cluster a GitHub issue backlog by root cause into a small set of plan-master issues, redirect children with a standardized comment, and bundle architectural-fix PRs that close clusters atomically. Use when an issue tracker has accumulated dozens of reports that share underlying defects, when asked to triage / consolidate / cluster / dedupe issues, when asked to build a plan series or roadmap from open issues, or when routing a new incoming bug into an existing plan.
Generate a serial week-by-week narrative digest of a project's full claude-mem timeline. Splits the timeline into per-ISO-week files, then runs one consecutive subagent per week — each receiving the prior week's carry-forward block — to produce one chapter per ISO week of data. Use when asked for "weekly digests", "week-by-week story", "serial timeline", or "narrative chapters" of a project's history.
Audit a design against Dieter Rams' ten "Good design is..." principles, then hand off a /make-plan prompt for one of three outcomes — new design, refine design, or redesign. Use when the user says "audit this design", "design review", "check this UI against Rams", "is this UI good", "critique this design", "design audit", or asks for a critique that should lead to a plan.
Turn one document into a kawaii NotebookLM slide-deck PDF. Use for "wowerpoint this", "make a deck about <file>", "turn this report into slides", or any request to render a single document as shareable narrative slides.
| name | standup |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Facilitate a read-only standup across git worktrees, branches, or PRs to compare changes and produce one consolidation plan. |
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read","Edit","Task","AskUserQuestion"] |
You're the facilitator. Each of the user's git worktrees (and any PRs they pick) joins a shared markdown chat as its own agent, and the agents reconcile their scattered work into ONE consolidated worktree. You convene the room, run the conversation in rounds, and carry the outcome back — the reconciling happens in the chat, between the agents.
The room is one shared file (default ~/.claude-mem/STANDUP.md): YAML front
matter holds the goal + prompt; the body is the transcript. Writes are
atomically locked, so agents speak at once. It is read-only — agents decide
how the merge should go; nobody commits or merges inside the room. Real git
work happens afterward via /do.
Two ways, mixable:
By recency (common) — worktrees active in a window:
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/standup.mjs" worktrees --since <1h|4h|24h|7d|all> --json
Active = a commit or an uncommitted/staged/untracked edit in the window. If the user didn't name a window, offer 1h / 4h / 24h / 7d / all.
By hand — specific branches and/or open PRs:
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/standup.mjs" worktrees --json # local branches
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/standup.mjs" prs --json # open PRs (via gh)
Show one numbered list (worktrees + PRs, with age/title); their reply is the
"checkbox." If prs errors (no gh / not GitHub), carry on worktrees-only.
Zero or one candidate isn't a standup — say so, offer to widen, stop. Otherwise echo the roster to confirm before you start.
Set a goal + prompt that invite a conversation, not one-shot status reports:
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/standup.mjs" open --force --agent facilitator \
--goal "Collapse these branches/PRs into ONE consolidated worktree: what each changed, where they overlap, which becomes the target, and the merge order." \
--prompt "Facilitated rounds. Round 1: introduce your branch and its state. Then resolve the conflicts the facilitator surfaces, round by round, until the room lands on one concrete plan (target worktree + merge order + conflict resolutions). Read-only: decide, don't merge. Register AGREE when you back the plan."
You drive the turns — if agents watch-loop on their own the room can stall with nothing decided. Each agent speaks once per round (read → post → return); you read between rounds and bring back whoever's still needed.
Spawned agents don't inherit CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR, so resolve it once and paste the
real path into each brief:
echo "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}"
Round 1 — intros (everyone, one Task message so they run together). Brief each:
You're
<branch>(a PR ispr-<number>) in a standup group chat. Read<skill-dir>/agent-brief.mdand play your part by it. The room is~/.claude-mem/STANDUP.md; speak withnode "<skill-dir>/standup.mjs" post …, catch up with… read. Get your bearings (cd "<path>",git log --oneline origin/main..HEAD,git status --short,git diff --stat origin/main...HEAD; a PR usesgh pr view/diff <number>), then post ONE turn: your branch, its real state, and how it should fold in. Read-only. Then return.
Reconcile. Once they've returned, read the room and list the open
items — overlaps, conflicts, competing implementations, undecided
target/order. None? Skip to the close.
Resolution rounds (cap ~4). Per open item, re-spawn only the agents it
implicates, with the specific question. Tell them to read --since <their-name>
first, then post their position and --agree if convinced. read again, update
the list. Repeat.
Close — you always write it. Stop when the list is empty, you hit the cap, or an agent errors (note "didn't report," don't block). Then write the SUMMATION yourself — don't wait for an agent to volunteer. Write it as plain prose a human can skim, not a field dump: which worktree is the target and why, the merge order in a sentence, and what's left for the human:
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/standup.mjs" summation --agent facilitator \
--text "Build on <worktree> — it's the only one with real code. Layer <branch>'s changes on top, then drop in the doc-only branches; skip <empty branch>. Your call before it's safe: <the one or two real decisions>. Done when it all sits in <target> and builds clean."
This is the payoff — don't hand them the raw SUMMATION, translate it. A human who didn't watch the room should understand the outcome without decoding paths, line counts, or commit hashes. Lead with the answer, then the few choices only they can make:
AskUserQuestion for the clear-cut ones.Keep git internals out unless they ask. Once they've settled the open calls, hand
the plan to /do to perform the merges — don't merge anything yourself
outside /do.
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/standup.mjs" <command> [--flags]
Defaults: agent = git branch, file = ~/.claude-mem/STANDUP.md. Every write is
atomically locked.
| command | what it does |
|---|---|
worktrees [--since 4h] [--json] | worktrees newest-first; --since N{m,h,d,w} keeps those active in the window |
prs [--since 4h] [--json] | open GitHub PRs (via gh) newest-first |
open --goal "…" --prompt "…" [--force] | create the room (--force rotates an old one aside) |
join [--message "…"] | add yourself + say Hello |
post --message "…" [--agree "…"] | append a turn |
agree --deliverable "…" | append an AGREE turn |
watch [--timeout SEC] [--interval SEC] | block until someone else posts, print it (exit 2 on timeout) |
read [--tail N] [--since AGENT] | print the chat (or only turns after AGENT's last) |
status | participants + AGREEs + consensus check |
summation --text "…" | write the SUMMATION, flip status: agreed |
Each spawned agent plays its turns by agent-brief.md (bundled here) — the
playbook for being one voice in the room.