| name | content-creation |
| description | Mastering High-Quality Thai Content Generation with Adaptive RAG v3 Evidence |
Content Creation Skill (Adaptive RAG v3)
This skill defines the technical benchmarks and linguistic rules for generating "Masterpiece" Thai content using the Adaptive RAG v3 architecture.
🏆 Core Philosophy
Content must be Evidence-First, Human-Centric, and Contextually Grounded. Never generate fluff. Every claim must have an underlying trace to the research data.
🛠️ Implementation Steps
1. Research & Fact-Check Phase
Before writing, always ensure the research data is cleaned and synthesized:
- Use
agentFilterFeed to select high-signal posts.
- Use
buildSearchPlan to ensure both Web (Tavily) and X data are present.
- Goal: Establish a
Fact Sheet with Verified Facts, Open Questions, and Community Signals.
2. Briefing Phase (Critical)
Never jump straight to drafting. Use buildContentBrief to define:
- Main Angle: What is the "hook"?
- Structure: 2-4 short paragraphs for social, or H1/H2 for articles.
- Voice Notes: Professional, human rhythmic flow.
3. Drafting & Drafting Ethics
- No Passive Voice: Avoid "ถูก..." unless it's a negative action.
- Semantic Spacing: Use spaces between independent clauses instead of rigid punctuation.
- Drop Pronouns: Drop "มัน" (it) or "พวกเขา" (they) where context is clear.
- No Dictionary Pairs: Never write "Artificial Intelligence (ปัญญาประดิษฐ์)". Choose one.
- Perspective: Write as a knowledgeable expert (Original Creator), not a news aggregator.
4. Ethical Grounding (Source Integrity)
- Primary Lead Sovereignty: The user-provided source [PRIMARY LEAD] is the priority. Never overwrite its core message with opposite facts from web research.
- Conflict Handling: If research contradicts the lead, report the discrepancy (e.g., "มีกระแสข่าวที่ขัดแย้งกัน...") instead of choosing one side.
- No Positive Hallucination: Never invent "good news" (e.g., more investment) to compensate for "bad news" (e.g., shutdown) provided by the user.
- Epistemic Humility: Use phrases like "มีรายงานว่า..." or "แหล่งข่าวอ้างว่า..." when dealing with conflicting or high-stakes rumors.
5. Polish & Quality Control
- Anti-Bait: Strip engagement bait (e.g. "คุณคิดยังไง?").
- Hype Mitigation: Soften words like "สะเทือนโลก" to "มีนัยสำคัญ" but Never change the core fact (e.g. don't change 'loss' to 'gain').
- Citation Check: Ensure the [T1], [T2] citations align with the fact sheet.
📏 Linguistic Benchmarks (Thai)
| Rule | Bad AI-Thai | Good Native Thai | Rationale |
|---|
| Space | "บริษัทAppleเปิดตัวสินค้า!" | "บริษัท Apple เปิดตัว..." | Improved readability. |
| Passive | "มันถูกมองว่าเป็น..." | "หลายคนมองว่า..." | Professional tone. |
| Hype | "โลกจะไม่เหมือนเดิมอีกต่อไป" | "แคมเปญนี้ได้เปลี่ยนภาพตลาด..." | Professional credibility. |
| Emoji | "🚀🔥⚡️" | "🔥" (Max 3-4 per post) | Avoid spammy look. |
📦 Related Services
GrokService.js: generateStructuredContentV2 (Primary entry point)TwitterService.js: Evidence curation logic
